Replies

THIS is what we should be talking about instead of Cheney and ports.""

The operation of our ports is a correct topic for FR, I think. As for Cheney:
Who is making t-shirts that say:
I WOULD RATHER GO HUNTING WITH DICK CHENEY THAN DRIVING WITH TED KENNEDY!!! ??
I WOULD LIKE ONE IF THERE IS SUCH A THING. CONTACT ME DIRECTLY, PLEASE.

Too late now. They could find a billion tons of WMD stockpiled somewhere in Iraq and it wouldn't matter. The port story is undoing all that has been done to fight this war in the minds of many on both sides of the political aisle. Whoever took Karl Rove...ha ha...very funny...PUT HIM BACK NOW!

:-) JEDI.

Someone in the White House screwed this up....BIG TIME....

I've BEEN talking about it. Proof or no, with eyes closed and fingers stuck
in their ears, my mentally disturbed liberal friends are chanting "Bush lied".

It's nuts. Like we are two countries living on one soil. Not a good sign. Come,
let us REASON together.

"THIS is what we should be talking about instead of Cheney and ports..."

Yes. This, and how the Russians helped Saddam move these WMDs out of Iraq. The pieces are finally coming together, but it should have been obvious what the Russians were doing in Iraq before the war. Besides helping Saddam with GPS and anti-aircraft weaponry, they were helping move all the WMD material they (and France) provided to Saddam in the years leading up to the war.

Is it any wonder why France, China and Soviets objected to this war? Just looking at the Stockholm report shows that these 3 (especially Russia) were the leading supplier of weapons material to Saddam. The last thing they needed was for the US to catch Saddam with WMDs with "Made in the USSR" printed on their side...especially since they were also signatories to these UN sanctions and embargos.

This is also why when WMDs weren't found, it was these same countries (especially France) who started the smear campaigns. From future oil contracts to debt and WMDs, these counties have aided Saddam and tried to destroy the US...and its public image, from the beginning. This is a much larger problem than anyone wants to admit or even talk about.

Rush Limbaugh mentioned the WMD evidence again today. I hope he does not let it go. His theory is that the intelligence community would be shown with another embarrassing failure which would worsen their reputation even more.

My theory is what I call the Honey Pot Theory. This says that we do know where the weapons are. In fact, the weapons are under such close scrutiny that they can be used to keep track of the important "bears" guarding the honey pot. Knowing who these "bears" are is just as important as the weapons themselves. Keeping the "bears" ignorant of the fact that we know is good too. They will let us know who their accomplices are.

And Rush can ask the question every day why we haven't revealed the truth of the weapons. This is good because the "bears," in order to keep the honey pot nice and safe, will divulge more secrets in their cult of honey love.

"THIS is what we should be talking about instead of Cheney and ports. "

What, you're still waiting for the MSM to show some interest in facts and reality-based priorities?

I admire your tenacity.

The MSM and Democrats will never allow it. My real problem is why does Bush and the Republicans not push it to the front. One theory is that it will out some countries whose help we need in the war on terror..Namely China,Russia and France who the hell else. They tried to protect Saddam big-time from the start of this.