Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

3 Charged With Planning Attacks in Iraq (News conference at 1:30 PM EST)
Breitbart (AP) ^ | 2/21/2006 | staff

Posted on 02/21/2006 8:47:54 AM PST by wjersey

CLEVELAND

A federal grand jury has indicted three Ohio men on charges of planning attacks on U.S. military personnel in Iraq, according to an indictment.

The three men, who all lived in Toledo within the last year, were arrested over the weekend, said Assistant U.S. Attorney David Bauer in Toledo. The indictment was unsealed Monday.

They were to be arraigned in federal courts in Cleveland and Toledo on Tuesday afternoon.

The suspects recruited others to train for a violent holy war against the United States and its allies in Iraq, the indictment said. The group traveled together to a shooting range to practice shooting guns and studied how to make explosives, the indictment said.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: aliens; americahaters; buckeyejihad; enemywithin; fifthcolumn; islaminamerica; jihadinamerica; marwan; marwanagain; mustbethegoodmuslims; nathansonisdead; religionofpeace; timeofwar; toledocell; traitors; treason; trop; watchoutforthecougar; whereismandy; whywefight; yourjobinamerica; yourjobiniraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-183 next last
To: GW and Twins Pawpaw

Definately beginning to look like a pro...


141 posted on 02/21/2006 1:22:13 PM PST by DoughtyOne (If you don't want to be lumped in with those who commit violence in your name, take steps to end it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Thanks!! So that I don't miss anything, I really should write all the 'facts' down before I make my posts....


142 posted on 02/21/2006 1:28:41 PM PST by GW and Twins Pawpaw (Sheepdog for Five [My grandkids are way more important than any lefty's feelings!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: GW and Twins Pawpaw

Just start a checkoff list.

It's Bush's fault, check
Haliburton was involved, check
It fits a pattern, check
They don't provide timely information, check

LOL, just have fun with it.

Later.


143 posted on 02/21/2006 1:34:08 PM PST by DoughtyOne (If you don't want to be lumped in with those who commit violence in your name, take steps to end it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart

Holy Toledo!!!


144 posted on 02/21/2006 4:00:04 PM PST by RonnG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I will print your post and tape it to my monitor so that I remember who's truly at fault here and won't have to write fifty times 'Bush's fault' to turn in tomorrow...


145 posted on 02/21/2006 4:07:00 PM PST by GW and Twins Pawpaw (Sheepdog for Five [My grandkids are way more important than any lefty's feelings!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: maggief
That was for a UT professional development class - probably just a company research type of assignment. The Toledo Blade article on this claims Wassim was a mechanical engineering student, not an electrical engineering student as your link would imply. I actually graduated from UT Engineering in December, but I recall no person by this name while I was there.
146 posted on 02/21/2006 4:11:17 PM PST by mjwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GW and Twins Pawpaw

Glad to be of help...


147 posted on 02/21/2006 4:28:06 PM PST by DoughtyOne (If you don't want to be lumped in with those who commit violence in your name, take steps to end it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle

"I've heard this before and have searched the Constitution for this authority. I have written my congressmen and three Presidents to try and find out what clause granted the executive the authority to over ride law."

Article II Section 2 "The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States and of the militia of the several states, when called into the Service of the United States.

FISA came after this, and FISA can not interfere with it or overrule it. Your suggestion that the President has "authority to over ride" law is backwards. The constitution comes first. The only way to override the constitution is by an amendment to the constitution. If our system of Government was the way you depict it, there would be no need for a constitution at all. We could simply make any law we wanted at any time to override the constitution.

If you read the preamble, it starts with "We the People of the United States", further it distinguishes between law enforcement "establish justice" and war "provide for the common defense". Criminal law and war were distinguished here and at other locations in the constitution. It is clear that the founders did not confuse the 2.


148 posted on 02/21/2006 6:47:50 PM PST by mjaneangels@aolcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: mjaneangels@aolcom
I believe that you have misunderstood my position. That is exactly the point I was making.

GE
149 posted on 02/21/2006 7:33:56 PM PST by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: mjaneangels@aolcom
My post #123:
I've heard this before and have searched the Constitution for this authority. I have written my congressmen and three Presidents to try and find out what clause granted the executive the authority to over ride law. It is not there.

The first sentance was a quote from another poster to which I responded as above.
150 posted on 02/21/2006 7:39:00 PM PST by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle

"The first sentance was a quote from another poster to which I responded as above."

The first sentence that you had in reply 123 was Peach quoting someone else at the time FISA was made.

"Even Carter's Attorney General made a statement, when Carter signed FISA into law, that this in no way took away the Constitutional authority of the presiden to override the new law if the president thought it was necessary to protect the citizens of the country."

Your first statement: ""I've heard this before and have searched the Constitution for this authority. I have written my congressmen and three Presidents to try and find out what clause granted the executive the authority to over ride law." was what I responded to. A law by Congress can not override the Constitution. The Constitution can not be overriden by FISA. The President already has authority to ignore this law regarding war. I don't care if someone from the Carter administration thinks that somehow is overriding the FISA law, it is not, FISA can not override the constitution.


151 posted on 02/21/2006 7:49:22 PM PST by mjaneangels@aolcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: wjersey

The three men, who all lived in Toledo...

Please tell me Jaimie Farr wasn't one of them!!!


152 posted on 02/21/2006 7:50:44 PM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle; Peach

"I believe that you have misunderstood my position. That is exactly the point I was making.

GE"

I don't think you did make the same point as I did. I stated that the constitution can not be overridden by a law like FISA. You stated: "I believe that you have misunderstood my position. That is exactly the point I was making.

GE"

Clearly you think that FISA overrides the constitution and should be amended by Congress and the courts should now be made to come in to sign warrants before the President can act as Commander in Chief during war.

Peach, see post 151 also.




153 posted on 02/21/2006 7:59:33 PM PST by mjaneangels@aolcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

Actually David Besse is just east of Toledo, on Lake Erie, about 1 hour from Sandusky.


154 posted on 02/21/2006 8:06:59 PM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: mjaneangels@aolcom
Clearly you think that FISA overrides the constitution and should be amended by Congress and the courts should now be made to come in to sign warrants before the President can act as Commander in Chief during war.
whew... I'm still not quite sure here.
There is no Law that can over ride the Constitution. Where we may differ in view is that you seem to think that the President becomes King at wartime and the Constitution is null and void? If so, then we most definitely do differ. And you also differ with both the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist position.
The President is Commander in Chief in both war and peace. There is nothing anywhere in the Constitution that authorizes the President to override the Constitution or laws made by the Congress either in war or peacetime.
Perhaps you were thinking of the old Soviet Unions Constitution.

Our Constitution is very clear
Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


However the Congress can suspend the Writ of Habeas Corpus as provided for in Article 1, Section 9.
The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

This administration along with many others, especially in the last 70 or so years do not depend or look to Constitutional authority, they look to president set by other illegal activities by previous administrations to justify their actions.

We the people no longer require our elected officials to abide by the law.

I may have simply been up too long and have completely misunderstood you - if so, I am sorry.

Even so - Cordially
GE
155 posted on 02/21/2006 9:26:01 PM PST by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: wjersey; nuconvert; MikeinIraq; Allegra
3 Ohioans face terror charges
The trio of Muslim men thought no one would notice.

They had been shooting at targets, learning to build suicide-bomber vests and seeking chemical explosives for months, federal officials charge.

So as Toledo geared up to celebrate July Fourth last year, investigators said, the men figured it was the perfect time to test their explosives in the city's shadows. Surely their neighbors wouldn't notice a few extra kabooms amid the fireworks.

The men were wrong.

Muslims in Toledo had tipped off the FBI even before July 4. A federal indictment unsealed Tuesday charged the men -- Mohammad Zaki Amawi, Marwan Othman El-Hindi and Wassim I. Mazloum -- with conspiracy and other crimes, accusing them of secretly plotting to aid and to join the insurgency battling U.S.-led coalition forces in Iraq.

(cont'd)

Two things of note here:

1) Their Muslim neighbors informed on them. So much for Muslims never saying anything about terrorism.

2) Their intent was to commit terrorist acts in Iraq moreso than in America. This supports the "flypaper" theory vis a vis our involvement in Iraq.

-Eric

156 posted on 02/22/2006 5:07:19 AM PST by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc; MikeinIraq; Old Sarge
1) Their Muslim neighbors informed on them. So much for Muslims never saying anything about terrorism.

Thank you for posting that out. I hope that some of the knee-jerk "all-Muslims-are-evil-and-deserve-to-die" crowd sees this.

By the way, in Iraq locals inform on terrorists all the time. At a very great risk to themselves and to their families.

Ask any soldier who works over here in an intel capacity.

157 posted on 02/22/2006 5:14:39 AM PST by Allegra (Save the Mediterranean Fruitfly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: Allegra; E Rocc

"By the way, in Iraq locals inform on terrorists all the time. At a very great risk to themselves and to their families."

That can't possibly be true because we never hear about it and we know that muslims are all the same. Plus, I'm sure someone here knows better and will quote the koran or hadith and tell us that muslims aren't allowed to turn in their muslim neighbors. Hence, the people you're talking about aren't muslims. They're muslim impersonators. And btw, you must be muslim yourself and just lying to us infidels.
Need I say sarcasm off?


158 posted on 02/22/2006 6:06:22 AM PST by nuconvert ([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
LOL!

As tired as I am, I didn't even need the "sarcasm off" to enjoy that. ;-)

159 posted on 02/22/2006 6:35:01 AM PST by Allegra (Save the Mediterranean Fruitfly!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: RonnG
Holy Toledo!!!

I can't believe it took 144 posts for this. ;o)

160 posted on 02/22/2006 11:51:17 AM PST by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson