Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SAVAGE INTERVIEWING CHUCK SCHUMER!

Posted on 02/17/2006 3:43:01 PM PST by outofhere2

Michael Savage is talking to Chuck Schumer at this very minute.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; gosavage; maritime; michaelwiener; portsale; savage; savageforpresident; savagewanker; talkradio; trojanhorseports; uae
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 621-634 next last
To: outofhere2

Yes... unfortunately the Rats will get credit and the GOP will be blamed.


Fabulous!!!

I am incredulous!!

Tom Coburn and Peter King are heroes!!! Hillary is LATE ON THIS, but she'll get all the credit.

It's vomit-causing.


81 posted on 02/17/2006 3:59:21 PM PST by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

And I just saw a flock of pigs fly by my window!


82 posted on 02/17/2006 3:59:24 PM PST by SwinneySwitch (Liberals-beyond your expectations!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: outofhere2; MikeA

Wow, you can't reply with a meaningful answer?


83 posted on 02/17/2006 3:59:32 PM PST by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

how? the Treasury committee who made this decision, has no congressional oversight.


84 posted on 02/17/2006 3:59:38 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Exactly. As Schumer said, the minute this would start up, terrorists would try to infiltrate.

Security will not be tight enough over there to stop that.

It leaves us wide open.

Schumer said: "I will keep fighting on this until they undo it."


85 posted on 02/17/2006 3:59:43 PM PST by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: oceanview; outofhere2
FReepers should be smart enough to understand when Democrats are taking a phony issue as an attempt to be tough on National Security. You are playing right into their hands.
86 posted on 02/17/2006 3:59:44 PM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

Hey, I'm just impressed that someone in Iowa used the word "schmuck" correctly.


87 posted on 02/17/2006 3:59:50 PM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
what's the difference, a UAE controlled company will OPERATE these ports

Practically speaking you're right.

Politically speaking, I can just hear the demo's response the next time the GOP tries to convince voters they're serious about the war on terror - so concerned they turned over the control of the 6 largest ports in the US the UAE underwritten by our great good friends the Saudis.

88 posted on 02/17/2006 4:00:04 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

That's true -- I forgot about him. But Fosella has almost no seniority in Congress, which means he isn't likely to get a committee chairmanship anytime soon.


89 posted on 02/17/2006 4:00:23 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Leave a message with the rain . . . you can find me where the wind blows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Yankee

Schumer is a bum and this doesn't change that. He routinely imperils this nation's security.


90 posted on 02/17/2006 4:00:54 PM PST by faithincowboys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: lewislynn

michelles writings have all you need to know as to why UAE is not to be trusted.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1580589/posts
Malkin: Stop the Port Sellout / Our Ports, Our Sovereignty (+UAE links to 9/11)


91 posted on 02/17/2006 4:01:15 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite (There's nothing "Mainstream" about the Orwellian Media!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: DOGEY

Enquiring minds want to know! ;-)

LLS


92 posted on 02/17/2006 4:01:18 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: faithincowboys

The Dems might get credit for this but look who handed them this bone. BUSH. Why did he do this deal?


93 posted on 02/17/2006 4:01:28 PM PST by outofhere2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: texasbluebell; Baynative; All

Thank you all for the links


94 posted on 02/17/2006 4:01:32 PM PST by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

Comment #95 Removed by Moderator

To: Pukin Dog

Although on it's surface I don't like this deal, I also have to agree with you re: the Democrats beating the drum on this.


96 posted on 02/17/2006 4:01:50 PM PST by antceecee (Reagan Democrat and now a Bush Republican...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: outofhere2
Michelle has some info on the UAE company, FYI:


Malkin: Stop the Port Sellout / Our Ports, Our Sovereignty (+UAE links to 9/11)
  Posted by cgk
On 02/17/2006 11:56:33 AM CST · 57 replies · 1,258+ views


MichelleMalkin.com ^ | 2-16-06 | Michelle Malkin
STOP THE PORT SELLOUT By Michelle Malkin   ·   February 16, 2006 10:10 PM ***scroll for updates*** Forget about the Cheney accidental shooting. Based on my e-mail and the growing outcry from both sides of the political aisle, this was and is the big story of the week--and it's picking up steam: [LES KINSOLVING]: The government's Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States has approved a deal that will put six major ports in the United States under the control of a state-sponsored company based in Dubai, the United Arab Emirates. And my question: Knowing, as we do, that...
 

97 posted on 02/17/2006 4:02:11 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Das Outsider

lol- It's safer than talking about Able Danger.


98 posted on 02/17/2006 4:02:18 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Join the FR folding team!! http://vspx27.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=teampage&teamnum=36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: outofhere2

Why post a thread about something happening on the radio or TV, unless you are planning to give details?? Just start a chat session and the rest of us will know not to bother.


99 posted on 02/17/2006 4:02:39 PM PST by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog; oceanview; outofhere2; Itzlzha
"FReepers should be smart enough to understand when Democrats are taking a phony issue as an attempt to be tough on National Security. You are playing right into their hands."

Tom Coburn is a Democrat? When did he switch parties?


100 posted on 02/17/2006 4:03:34 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite (There's nothing "Mainstream" about the Orwellian Media!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 621-634 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson