Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: West Coast Conservative
DANG, DANG, DANG....WHAT A GUY..
I love this President!!!
2 posted on
02/08/2006 9:27:31 AM PST by
Txsleuth
(l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
To: West Coast Conservative
Gota love how they say 'divert more than $700 billion of Social Security tax revenues'.
No. Divert is what is going on now where a person's cash is DIVERTED to the government who MIGHT in the future revert a PORTION of that to the individual. When an individual's money is put into a private account which only that person can access it is not DIVERTED it is SAVED.
4 posted on
02/08/2006 9:31:10 AM PST by
x5452
To: West Coast Conservative
Is this supposed to be some sort of a problem for Bush? He has submitted a budget PROPOSAL. It is not as if he took an already approved budget and stuck this SS stuff in. If the libs don't like it they can refuse to ok the budget until it is removed and the other changes they are sure to want are made.
To: West Coast Conservative
Okay congress, debate this! *chuckle*
6 posted on
02/08/2006 9:32:11 AM PST by
Bahbah
(An admitted Snow Flake and a member of Sam's Club)
To: West Coast Conservative
I'm sorry but this is Flush the Koran Newsweak. They have no longer credible as a serious source of information. Please return when you have some crediblie sources confirm of this information please.
7 posted on
02/08/2006 9:32:14 AM PST by
MNJohnnie
("Vote Democrat-We are the party of reactionary inertia".)
To: West Coast Conservative
But anyone who thought that Bush would wait for bipartisanship to deal with Social Security was wrong.
Naturally, because, were He to wait, the 2nd Term would go out with No visible progress, so I believe.
He had to establish some gain to push the ball out of the muddy rut.
8 posted on
02/08/2006 9:32:53 AM PST by
ExcursionGuy84
("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
To: West Coast Conservative
It looks like he is taking a more aggressive stance in his budget proposal than he did in the SOTU speech. I hope he sticks to it.
9 posted on
02/08/2006 9:33:43 AM PST by
rob777
(Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
To: West Coast Conservative
Well most citizens have children and grandchildren and should be interested in private accounts for the next generations who may not see any social security benefit. If not, it says something about them. A sad commentary indeed.
If you are younger, don't get physical, get political. This is your issue and this is the time for your voices to be heard. Take up the mantle and vote. Collectively, you have some clout. Use it!!
11 posted on
02/08/2006 9:36:41 AM PST by
maxter
To: qam1
16 posted on
02/08/2006 9:42:51 AM PST by
misterrob
(Democrats, The Party of Treason)
To: West Coast Conservative
Heh, so much for the President being stupid.
20 posted on
02/08/2006 9:45:17 AM PST by
SuziQ
To: West Coast Conservative
Do NOT play chess with this man.
Get 'er done. Go, Sir, Go!
('scuse me, a little happy dancing here.)
To: West Coast Conservative
"the president still cares deeply about this." So do I, Sir! Go Mr. President!!!
29 posted on
02/08/2006 10:02:08 AM PST by
Just A Nobody
(NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
To: Reagan Man
I'll take you serious RM when you attack the Democrats 1/5th as often as you attack what is supposedly "your side"
30 posted on
02/08/2006 10:04:28 AM PST by
MNJohnnie
("Vote Democrat-We are the party of reactionary inertia".)
To: West Coast Conservative
He'll let Hillary take the credit for it when he hands over the reigns. Good friends wash each other's backs.
I believe in privatization in any event and the Dems will do it when they get the credit.
GOP are boot lickers and gloves.
31 posted on
02/08/2006 10:11:29 AM PST by
Spirited
To: West Coast Conservative
But anyone who thought that Bush would wait for bipartisanship to deal with Social Security was wrong. Instead, he stuck his own privatization proposals into his proposed budget. That is what I wanted a year ago. Last year's plan was a general "let's privatize a little of SS. Congress, please work out the details." He has realized that Congress won't do any such thing, so he puts his proposal forward.
Now to track down the details to see if I like this new plan.
35 posted on
02/08/2006 10:21:41 AM PST by
KarlInOhio
(During wartime, some whistles should not be blown. - Orson Scott Card)
To: Reagan Man
You may claim what ever you like. Your ACTIONS, however, speak louder then your words
38 posted on
02/08/2006 10:28:42 AM PST by
MNJohnnie
("Vote Democrat-We are the party of reactionary inertia".)
To: West Coast Conservative; qam1
From what country will F'in Kerry call for a filibuster this time?
41 posted on
02/08/2006 10:53:53 AM PST by
uglybiker
(If a Liberal said something, and there was no one around to hear. Would it still be stupid?)
To: West Coast Conservative
42 posted on
02/08/2006 10:59:43 AM PST by
roaddog727
(P=3/8 A. or, P=plenty...............)
To: West Coast Conservative
What remains to be seen is whether this time around Bush follows through on forming a bipartisan commission and whether he can get credible Democrats to join it.
First, he's have to find a few of those, which might be the most difficult task of all.
To: West Coast Conservative
![Image hosted by TinyPic.com](http://tinypic.com/au6s0n.gif)
Yee-haw! Hope it's true. Force the issue onto the table. Thank you, Mr. President.
55 posted on
02/08/2006 12:21:46 PM PST by
Pirate21
(The liberal media are as sheep clearing the path along which they will be lead to the slaughter.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson