Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: West Coast Conservative

DANG, DANG, DANG....WHAT A GUY..

I love this President!!!


2 posted on 02/08/2006 9:27:31 AM PST by Txsleuth (l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Txsleuth
YIppee-Yi-KEE-YI YAAAAAAAYYYY!!!!

Just like with Ambassador John Bolton: appointment by recession, right under the radar!!!

3 posted on 02/08/2006 9:30:29 AM PST by ExcursionGuy84 ("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Txsleuth
Talk is cheap. Bush will have to settle for a similiar deal to what Reagan got. A SS reform commission like the Greenspan Commission of the early 1980`s. hey, the Fed Chief IS out of a job, so maybe he'll be interested. LOL

Social security remains the third rail of American politics. The American people like SS and with the new Bush PDP, the people like Medicare even more. Big government Republicans pushing a cradle to grave nanny-state mentality.

Isn't Euro-socialism great. ~sarc off~

10 posted on 02/08/2006 9:34:56 AM PST by Reagan Man (Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Txsleuth

Don't be ridiculous. He can't change the law with a budget item. Bush is more of a moron than I thought.


13 posted on 02/08/2006 9:37:34 AM PST by Mr_Peter (Don't let the door hit ya in the a$$ on the way out Bushy...but don't let a Democrat in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Txsleuth
"Bush also wants to change the way Social Security benefits are calculated for most people by adopting so-called progressive indexing. Lower-income people would continue to have their Social Security benefits tied to wages, but the benefits paid to higher-paid people would be tied to inflation.

"Wages have typically risen 1.1 percent a year more than inflation, so over time, that disparity would give lower-paid and higher-paid people essentially the same benefit. However, higher-paid workers would be paying substantially more into the system than lower-paid people would.

"This means that although progressive indexing is an attractive idea from a social-justice point of view, it would reduce Social Security's political support by making it seem more like welfare than an earned benefit."

85 posted on 02/08/2006 3:56:10 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson