Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[UK] School deems hot cross buns 'offensive'
UPI ^ | 6 February 2006

Posted on 02/06/2006 9:42:00 AM PST by NativeNewYorker

IPSWICH, England, Feb. 6 (UPI) -- A school in England has decided that hot cross buns are religiously offensive, and demanded the supplier start making them as simply cross-less currant buns.

Traditionally served at Easter time, the buns have been around since 1361, when a monk reportedly made small spiced cakes stamped with the sign of the cross, to be distributed to the poor visiting the monastery at St. Albans on Good Friday.

Head teacher Tina Jackson of the Oaks Primary School in Ipswich says that might offend some religious minorities like Jehovah's Witnesses, who are not allowed to worship things of a pagan nature.

But the Rev. Haley Dossor told the Suffolk Evening Star political correctness has gone too far.

"All religions have particular traditions, habits and customs and this is one of the traditions of the Church of England," he said.

One parent who asked not to be identified told the newspaper it was an absurd move.

"I have never heard of anything so ridiculous. Since when have hot cross buns been offensive?" the parent asked the Star.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: bunban; cantmakethisup; cross; dhimmi; dhimmitude; england; eurabia; jihadonbuns; libertarians; pc; politicalcorrectness; sharia; sharialaw; thoughtpolice; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

1 posted on 02/06/2006 9:42:01 AM PST by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

Everything and Anything that has anything to do with Christian values is now offensive.


2 posted on 02/06/2006 9:43:07 AM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

How in the world are hot cross buns "things of a pagan nature"?


3 posted on 02/06/2006 9:43:46 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Head teacher Tina Jackson of the Oaks Primary School in Ipswich says that might offend some religious minorities like Jehovah's Witnesses, who are not allowed to worship things of a pagan nature.

Ughhh...

4 posted on 02/06/2006 9:44:09 AM PST by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

Watch out, or the Jehovah's Witnesses will start rioting, eh?

More likely they could abstain from buns. As could the Muslims, if they choose. I'm not sure that I'd eat a bun with a Muslim sign on it, but then again if it was in a Muslim country I wouldn't riot over it.

This kind of PC action actually invites the Muslims to riot, which they never would have thought of otherwise.


5 posted on 02/06/2006 9:44:50 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

A Danish by any other name is still a Danish.


6 posted on 02/06/2006 9:45:03 AM PST by timsbella (Mark Steyn for Prime Minister of Canada!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
Everything and Anything that has anything to do with Christian values is now offensive.

Atheists, LIBS, Secularists: "It's all in your mind..."

7 posted on 02/06/2006 9:45:12 AM PST by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
What next? Banning the pop singer Christopher Cross?

What?! That has already been done?

Never mind.

8 posted on 02/06/2006 9:45:23 AM PST by llevrok (I don't know the difference between latter and former - and I don't care !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

"the buns have been around since 1361"

That's what a secular "progressive" thinking gets you! Culture at its finest. I think they should deem English offensive. Maybe teach more Arabic? Sounds much more "inclusive" to me.

Red6


9 posted on 02/06/2006 9:45:35 AM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

Please send me all the offensive hot-cross-buns. I'll 'take care' of them.


10 posted on 02/06/2006 9:45:39 AM PST by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

Jehova's Witnessness? Yeah sure. Fess up lady, we know who you're really afraid of offending.


11 posted on 02/06/2006 9:45:47 AM PST by TheSpottedOwl (Support the fence....grow a Victory Garden!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

Of course, Hot Stickey Buns are just fine.


12 posted on 02/06/2006 9:45:57 AM PST by Pylot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I'm as baffled as you.

The article clearly states,

"Traditionally served at Easter time, the buns have been around since 1361, when a monk reportedly made small spiced cakes stamped with the sign of the cross, to be distributed to the poor visiting the monastery at St. Albans on Good Friday."

How many pagan monks do you know? In 1361 St. Albans?


13 posted on 02/06/2006 9:46:12 AM PST by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

He's the minstrel gigilo don't you know


14 posted on 02/06/2006 9:46:27 AM PST by stainlessbanner (^W^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

Looks like I'm off to the British embassy...Any of my fellow Christians want to bring the matches?!?! </ sarcasm>


15 posted on 02/06/2006 9:46:54 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I'm not sure that I'd eat a bun with a Muslim sign on it ....

Even a crescent roll?

16 posted on 02/06/2006 9:46:58 AM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Bend over and think of England.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

There is no attack on "X-mas"! It's made up by Bill O'Reily. Sarcasm off

Red6


17 posted on 02/06/2006 9:47:29 AM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker; Admin Moderator

Here's a link http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20060206-120137-1464r


18 posted on 02/06/2006 9:47:42 AM PST by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
We need to really work on the definition of "offensive".

Crucifix in a jar of urine? Oh, not offensive. That's art.

Evidence of a religion other than Islam? Highly offensive! Rid the world of hot-cross buns, or we will riot!

We have to stop playing the multiculti game.

19 posted on 02/06/2006 9:47:50 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

The buns won't be the same without the cross in them. Cutting the top like that allows the dough to expand during baking.


20 posted on 02/06/2006 9:47:53 AM PST by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson