Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Farewell to the GOP, for now at least! (Vanity Rant)
6-21-2006 | Mr. Hammer

Posted on 01/23/2006 5:51:10 AM PST by mr_hammer

Farewell to the GOP, for now at least!

January 21, 2006

To: RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman

Subject: The return of my 2006 RNC Membership Card

It is with deep regret that I find myself writing this letter to you.

I did in fact receive my 2006 RNC Membership Card. I will not be renewing my membership and I am returning the card to you. If you care about the why, then please read this entire letter.

When I pulled the lever for our current President in the elections of 2000 and 2004, this is what I thought I was voting for.

Limited Government

I am at odds with certain aspects of the Patriot Act with regards to the access of all types of records and data that may be private and none of this governments business.

Very appalling also is the attempt of this government to access Google’s database.

Don’t bring the War on Terror into this, you had all the info in the world to nail the 911 hijackers, but the size of the bureaucracy prevented this government from doing so.

Equally disappointing is the bungling of communication that occurred during Katrina. I am not holding the Federal Government responsible for the suffering, but I am making the point that the more you grow the federal Government the less it will actually be able to accomplish.

A Reduction of Taxes and Simplification of the Tax Code

Although some progress has been made on tax relief overall the tax code as we know it is a mess. Let’s move to the “Fair Tax” specified by Congressman Linder and Libertarian Neil Boortz. This will go along way in helping remove the lobbyist influence over our tax code in addition to trapping a lot of currently uncollected revenue.

Giving in to the WTO with regards to expiring export taxes is a joke. What happened to a level playing field? How can the exporters of domestic services and goods compete when you tie their hands behind their backs? How can you encourage investment state side with policies like that?

Adherence to the US Constitution and Working to Up Hold it’s Values!

U.S. Constitution Excerpt

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The campaign finance law passed under this administration was an direct assault to our Constitution. This must be reviewed and repealed.

U.S. Constitution Excerpt

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions.

The illegal immigration problem is at critical mass, but our President refuses to act forcefully in concurrence with our Constitution.

U.S. Constitution Excerpt

Nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

No greater assault on the Constitution and the ownership of private property can be seen than the Kelo decision. Where is the outrage from our supposedly Conservative controlled congress and Senate about this horrendous decision? What about the “Ownership Society” that is so often talked about in the halls of Washington? I cannot even convey the utter disappointment I feel over this.

A Strong Military

I do support the President on Afghanistan and Iraq, but do not support more butter than guns. Being able to afford a couple of hundred state of the art fighter’s is a far cry from where President Ronald Reagan had us a mere 20 years ago.

The Economy

Please, let’s not even go there. The only thing that kept things pointed in what appears to be the correct direction is Alan and the printing press. You want proof? Look at the price of gold and energy; they are the “real” international currency, not the dollar. The current administration and the previous one of Clinton did and are still living off of the economy and military of a real Conservative!

In closing, yes the Administration has done a good job in the Middle East and twenty years from now will probably be seen as a brilliant move in bring democracy there. I just hope we will be as free here at home.

If you need money to fund your mid term elections I suggest you go talk to the people the listed organizations below, because they seem to know what a Conservative should stand for. They are also getting all of my available funds in the future that is if the RNC does not change course.

Minute Man Project

The Gun Owners of America

Aopa

The NRA

Congressman Tancrado

United States Senate Candidate, John Mitchel (To replace the “RINO” Dewine)

Ohio State Gubernatorial Candidate, Kenneth Blackwell

National Right to Life Association

Free Republic.com

P.S. This may not be fact, but it is how I feel. You guys on the hill do not give a rat’s arse about the Constitution or the Son’s or Daughter’s of this Nation. The only thing that seems to matter is the amount of cash that can be jammed in the coffers and pleasing the Socialist One Worlder’s and I for one am sick of it.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: allaboutme; conservitive; constitama2shunprty; constitution; crank; dramaqueen; economy; freespeech; goingwobbly; gop; immigration; kelo; lookatme; military; pityparade; pseudoopus; quasiopus; rant; reagan; selfpityparty; taxes; terror; uselessvanity; war; whine; worthlessvanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 321-328 next last
To: Alia
"And what did YOU read in the fine print?"


For your reading pleasure. ;)


http://www.gop.com/media/2004platform.pdf





81 posted on 01/23/2006 6:28:07 AM PST by G.Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Can't speak for anyone else, but you're exactly right. I'm not a conservative.

Glad to hear you say it. Just wish the rest would.

82 posted on 01/23/2006 6:30:52 AM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: sandbar

I must admit, my libertarian side is coming out on this issue. Wasn't the big gripe about the Patriot act was that the government would start a 'slippery slope' and not only use the Patriot Act for terrorist activity but other activity not having anything to do with terrorism.





Mine too.


83 posted on 01/23/2006 6:31:57 AM PST by rob777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Designer
It comes with a donation to the RNC.

But not with a donation to Republican candidates, obviously.

84 posted on 01/23/2006 6:32:18 AM PST by gridlock (It's not really a circus until Teddy Kennedy steps out of the clown car...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance

Well, I took AP English all four years of high school.

Surprisingly, I actually remember some of it.


85 posted on 01/23/2006 6:33:04 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

If you think that stupid card that the fundrasing arm of the RNC sends you for coughing up $25 every year has any meaning at all, whatsoever, then I have an inheritance in Nigeria for you.


86 posted on 01/23/2006 6:33:22 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

87 posted on 01/23/2006 6:33:34 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: horse_doc
And the fact that had Roberts and Alito been on the court, Kelo would have been deep-six'ed.

Doubt it ... O'Connor and Scalia were in the minority. Kennedy was the swing vote, and he went the wrong way.

88 posted on 01/23/2006 6:33:45 AM PST by bassmaner (Let's take the word "liberal" back from the commies!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888

The most vital is "Limited Government". Many of us have given up on the GOP with just this one single point.






You nailed it!!


89 posted on 01/23/2006 6:38:34 AM PST by rob777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
The GOP will go down in flames in 06 and will lose the White House in 08 because they have made a mockery of "Limited Government", so much so that we can not even afford to fund military R&D and major weapon systems anymore.

I doubt it. The masses vote pocketbook first, and at least one poll shows a significant majority of Americans (moreso GOP than DEM) will give the government more power to encroach personal liberty, given the justification of protection from terrorism violence.

As an aside, I wonder why draw the privacy line there? Why not intrude to limit all violence? A child is just as dead if its mother or father kills it, as if Osama does.

The specific "loss of civil rights" issue now in the air is the NSA/electronic surveillance issue. I think that will play-out to the GOP favor. "We're at war" doncha know.

90 posted on 01/23/2006 6:41:54 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan; mr_hammer
SampleMan, outstanding reply!

I have been attempting in vain to convince many of the more hard-headed types around here that refusing to support Republicans helps elect Democrats for quite some time. Many people, including otherwise intelligent FReepers, can not seem to grasp the reality of how a two-party system works.

Mr. Hammer - Do you suppose you should support the most conservative party and/or candidate who can win elections? Otherwise you can support a fringer and help elect liberals. Your call.
91 posted on 01/23/2006 6:42:24 AM PST by RebelBanker (If you can't do something smart, do something right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Alia; rdb3

It takes a village of "Real Conservatives" to elect HRC as President.


92 posted on 01/23/2006 6:42:25 AM PST by .cnI redruM (Shame, not sanctions - UN policy on Iran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

Hillary!, Ted Kennedy, and Howard Dean thank you.


93 posted on 01/23/2006 6:43:42 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MACVSOG68

Hi, M. It seems the unappeasables are out in force this morning.


94 posted on 01/23/2006 6:47:07 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Indeed. I asked him what part of his "rant" he was unaware of when he voted for Bush in '04. No response.


95 posted on 01/23/2006 6:49:14 AM PST by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer

You've spammed about 4-5 threads with this same letter. It's doubtful you're a conservative; probably a sleeper troll trying to get conservatives mad at the RNC.

The Katrina bit gave you away; there's not a conservative alive I know that is mad at the feds for the Katrina disaster. Most of us know darned well it was an unresponsive city and state response which made the crisis much, much worse.


96 posted on 01/23/2006 6:49:30 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer; Dont_Tread_On_Me_888; rob777; The_Eaglet; billbears; ValenB4

It's always good to see more people choosing the red pill.


97 posted on 01/23/2006 6:50:30 AM PST by sheltonmac (QUIS CUSTODIET IPSOS CUSTODES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
"". I will however support the Republican Party against a grave threat to our nation called the demoncrat party""
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>..........
Seems many support GOP out of fear of Dems, no matter how the GOP has acted on OPEN BORDERS and Illegals, Big Spending, Non reaction to KELO and property rights, the time has come to stop supporting a Party that is so out of step with most of us..Reform can only come when the GOP sees it has lost it's base..any idea how that can be done with out withholding money, and votes??
98 posted on 01/23/2006 6:51:09 AM PST by ConsentofGoverned (if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
Glad to hear you say it.

And I'm glad that I said it, for I find conservatives to be weak. Very weak. I've weighed conservatism in the balance, and found it wanting.

And where is the locked down definition of the term "conservative?" Surely we on the Right can do better.


This is a ch__ch. What's missing?

99 posted on 01/23/2006 6:51:45 AM PST by rdb3 (What it is is what it was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: MACVSOG68

The president ran as a moderate. I'm always shocked when people say they don't know that. But when he first came to our town, I almost didn't go because I'm really not interested in moderates. Typically.

Not that the president is perfect, but anyone who didn't know what they were getting when they pulled the lever for Bush wasn't paying attention.


100 posted on 01/23/2006 6:52:25 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 321-328 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson