To: mr_hammer
You've spammed about 4-5 threads with this same letter. It's doubtful you're a conservative; probably a sleeper troll trying to get conservatives mad at the RNC.
The Katrina bit gave you away; there's not a conservative alive I know that is mad at the feds for the Katrina disaster. Most of us know darned well it was an unresponsive city and state response which made the crisis much, much worse.
96 posted on
01/23/2006 6:49:30 AM PST by
Peach
To: Peach
Listen hear, I specifically stated I do not hold the fed's accountable, but the perceived disarray caused much damage to the President. Had the bureaucracy been smaller the communication would have been clearer.
It appeared that no one was in charge.
We had 3 to 5 days to get ready for that disaster, I truly fear what would happen in a surprise disaster, such as a large earth quake.
IMO This government is bogged down with layers of lawyers and bureaucrats that will prevent it from actually helping anyone efficiently in the future.
105 posted on
01/23/2006 7:03:17 AM PST by
mr_hammer
(They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
To: Peach
Exactly what I was thinking - sleeper troll.
112 posted on
01/23/2006 7:18:39 AM PST by
UseYourHead
(Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.)
To: Peach; mr_hammer; sheltonmac
Equally disappointing is the bungling of communication that occurred during Katrina. I am not holding the Federal Government responsible for the suffering, but I am making the point that the more you grow the federal Government the less it will actually be able to accomplish. I believe Mr_hammer's objection is to unconstitutional federal government growth during the Katrina disaster.
He has the conservative position on this by objecting to federal socialism.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson