Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Outsourcing the American dream for nightmare
Sidney Herald ^ | Tuesday January 17, 2006 | Ellen Robinson

Posted on 01/17/2006 8:02:19 AM PST by Willie Green

For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use.

Inspired by a reader who sent a list of once American corporations who's profits are no longer funneled to the hard-working American employee, I investigated the subject.

The clip that landed on my desk was from "America is Selling Out," published in The American Conservative, December, 2005. As I digested, emotionally charged from the publication's Web site at www.economyincrisis.org, I agreed with some of the information, discarded the sensational propaganda and extrapolated my take on the issues' raw facts.

From what I've experienced and witnessed first-hand, I consider the current state of the American economy as a politically driven "the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer" economic model.

There are too many alarming signs in our country for the politicians to actually be blindly racing the mad horse into the flaming barn as it might appear. The social-economic gaps in our nation are at record heights. In recent years, there have been more billionaires than ever, more fresh college graduates filing bankruptcy than ever and increasing numbers of the middle class economically sinking.

Sadly, this is all by design, not some directionless fluke. Since the rich are richer than ever and the most profitable corporations are breaking records, the misled reports boast positive economic growth that are not a true reflection to what has happened to the nation's work force as a result of active globalization.

The weight has gotten heavier for those who pull the load - the American population - because it's the increased sweat that fuels the skyrocketing extravagance of the filthy elite few. This is the reversal point of the American Dream into the American Nightmare.

The current American economic model seems like a reversal of Robin Hood. The big and powerful are profiting and becoming even more powerful as the comfortable livings of the endangered middle class are reallocated for the increasingly exclusive and isolated pockets of wealth hoarders.

No one who is aware will deny that the corporations who apparently are running this country are outsourcing our jobs. The rationalization for the mass outsourcing is to provide American consumers with cheaper products. It almost makes sense that consumables should be cheaper since the displaced workers no longer have the higher-paying jobs to afford historically high-quality, American-made products.

The American Dream - the belief that through hard work, courage and determination one can achieve prosperity - has vanished in the atmosphere of this greed and power driven frenzy.

These days it's looking more like the American Dream is being outsourced in exchange for the American Nightmare which the vast majority of the nation's population is waking up to in this cheaper reality.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: americahate; bigblackcopters; bigcheese; bigcorporations; bigcustomerservice; biggovernment; biglabor; bigmsm; bignewspaper; bigoil; bigteleservice; bigtinfoil; bigtobacco; bigutilities; corporatism; depression; despair; doom; dustbowl; eeyore; globalism; grapesofwrath; itsanightmare; itsnotfair; itsoveritsover; joebtfsplk; killmenow; outsourcing; poorme; pullmyplug; reelectcarter; repent; richgetsricher; sackclothandashes; stagflation; suicidesolution; tdids; thebusheconomy; tinyviolin; waaaaaaaaaa; wgids; willielogic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-171 next last
To: Jim Robinson

Mebbe part 1 was deflected by the ultraviolet rays from yer tinfoil hat???


101 posted on 01/17/2006 6:13:25 PM PST by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
Well it's not that wishful of thinking. When I was a teenager in the 70s, everybody thought Russia would be our biggest enemy for the next hundred years and Russia would be a communist dictatorship for a long, long time. Then look what happened when Gorbachev rose to power. Not that Russia is totally democratic now, but they're a lot more reasonable and easier to deal with now.

We are pushing China hard to buy more American products and crack down on piracy of our software, music and DVD's. We're pushing them to build or purchase manufacturing plants here in the US. But they're still a commie dictatorship so they're tough to deal with and their people are underpaid and are not free to buy all American products. If we restrict their imports through legislation, they will no doubt respond initially by cutting back purchases of American products and starting a trade war. If we then respond and escalate the trade war, this pushes China away from free enterprise and reduces contact with the west. I do think we need to take a tougher stance in trade negotiations with China and make them agree to a certain dollar amount of purchases of US products. I'm puzzled by why we haven't taken a harder line in trade talks with China. This is probably also because we need their help to shut down North Korea's nuclear weapons program. So China is using NK as leverage to stick it to us economically.

I have to agree that it's time to get NK's nuke program shut down and finished, then take a much tougher stance with China on trade. China is abusing their trade relationship with us and it's time for that to stop.

102 posted on 01/17/2006 6:14:27 PM PST by defenderSD (¤¤ In a battle of wits against a FReeper, the typical liberal is unarmed. ¤¤)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Thats ok, Americans don't need to own production anymore because our main product is "creativity" now.

Com'n, man, I've been saying that "black hole engineering" and "nanotechnology" is the way for all of us to go. We need to shut our pieholes, dude, and waddle down to the nearest Wally World and buy the Junior Atomic Nanotechnology Kit and put our noses to the grindstone. Foo, we are so lazy, who needs jobs anyhoo? /sarcasm> (for the humor impaired)

Come to think of it, I think we've already mastered black hole engineering, that's where our jobs and sovereignty is all going. B-P
103 posted on 01/17/2006 6:16:19 PM PST by Nowhere Man ("Nationalist Retard" and proud of it! Michael Savage for President in 2008!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man

"Exactly and I do think the Republican's house of cards will fall on this and related issued in 2008 although it is possible we will see some cracks as early as this year in the midterm elections. Someone needs to put the fear of God into the Republicans so they quit being the "good old boy, checkered golf pants" party they have become and pay attention to the concerns of the average working person."

I agree fully as well. Furthermore, as much as I hate to say it, Bush seems to think he can coast on terrorism and Iraq being his only agenda. What he doesn't realize is that he can't ignore his domestic agenda and duties. He seems to (forgive me for sounding like a socialist) be allowing corporate america to happily gut the middle class by getting rid of our manufacturing jobs and allowing swarms of illegals in. Now if Manufacturing jobs were plentiful I doubt anyone here would mind too much. But combine it with outsourcing and someone is just begging for a major change to occur and I htink the democrats will get back in charge by stoking the resentment of the native borns against the illegals.


104 posted on 01/17/2006 6:51:26 PM PST by Niuhuru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD

"China is abusing their trade relationship with us and it's time for that to stop."

I would recommend having our corporate honchos just suddenly yank all the jobs out of China and put them back here, after getting rid of the crippling programs that drove them away in the first place.


105 posted on 01/17/2006 6:53:11 PM PST by Niuhuru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
That must be it.
106 posted on 01/17/2006 7:02:52 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD
Well, the trade deficit is in the hundreds of billions, while Chin is showing a trade SURPLUS. You know, the kind the US used to have before we started exporting every decent job overseas?

There is no reason whatsoever that we should enrich the people who will one day come to kill us. And make no mistake, that is exactly what China will do, either directly or through one of their surrogates, like North Korea.

107 posted on 01/17/2006 7:13:26 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

But it sure gets awful hot under one in the desert sun.

That's why I only wear mine off and on ... usually when I'm mowing the grass (mower fumes are well-know to cause them chemtrails to be sucked right in!!!) - can't be too careful.


108 posted on 01/17/2006 7:46:04 PM PST by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Oh, they'll become "free traders". You see "free traders"
won't deny the benefits of "free trade" to communists, because communists can produce really cheap goods.It takes a fairly low IQ to accept communism as a means of manufacturing for very low or no wages, which the "free traders" have done in spades.


109 posted on 01/17/2006 7:54:26 PM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm millions richer, thanks to the revolutionary "free trade" system--Jaing Zemin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man

Tai-kong suo-yo de xing-chiou do sai-jin wu di pi-gu!


110 posted on 01/17/2006 7:58:26 PM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm millions richer, thanks to the revolutionary "free trade" system--Jaing Zemin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
Cheap labor never ever comes cheap. In the end, it costs far more than providing decently paid jobs.

Depends on point of view. Cheap labor can never be cheap enough for the greedy. When one is an addict, One's attention is usually increasingly and obsessively drawn to the object of their addiction. That is the state of things today with these greed mongers who preach that Greed is good.. That's like saying Alcoholism or narcotics habits are good. Henry Ford's idea was keeping Cost low and Employee pay as high as possible while still making a profit. Today, the standard is keep cost low while paying the employee as little as possible.. You can only cut wages so much before the employee is working for nothing. But if that were the end result, someone would surely tell us that is proper..

111 posted on 01/17/2006 8:18:26 PM PST by Havoc (President George and King George.. coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
They'll become protectionists and post here.

Math is hard!!

112 posted on 01/17/2006 8:38:21 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Stop associating with Commies and we'll stop mentioning that you associate with Commies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

They just might become communists and join the WTO!
After all, communists can become millions richer, thanks to the revolutionary "free trade" system!


113 posted on 01/17/2006 9:37:28 PM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm millions richer, thanks to the revolutionary "free trade" system--Jaing Zemin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
After all, communists can become millions richer

So can sugar farmers, thanks to your revolutionary quota and subsidy system! But that's okay, you're only screwing those citizens who use sugar and food containing sugar. And those citizens who pay taxes.

114 posted on 01/17/2006 9:49:51 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Stop associating with Commies and we'll stop mentioning that you associate with Commies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
So can sugar farmers,

So you'd rather the communists get richer? That figures, "free trader".
115 posted on 01/17/2006 9:52:28 PM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm millions richer, thanks to the revolutionary "free trade" system--Jaing Zemin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
So you'd rather the communists get richer? That figures, "free trader".

I'd rather people paid market prices for goods. Without being forced to overpay because some lobbyist got to some congressmen. But higher prices don't bother you, do they? You must be a rich, overcharging socialist. Post any more Commie articles you agree with lately?

116 posted on 01/17/2006 9:56:48 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Stop associating with Commies and we'll stop mentioning that you associate with Commies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
I'd rather people paid market prices for goods.

Since you only parrot the WTO and their "member states", I don't think so.All of the countries yelling about US farm policy subsidize their own farmers, so it can't be that you're against subsidies. One can only assume you have a deeper underlying animosity towards Americans.
117 posted on 01/17/2006 10:04:21 PM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm millions richer, thanks to the revolutionary "free trade" system--Jaing Zemin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Post any more Commie articles you agree with lately?

You're a laugh riot, as the WTO welcomes communist VIET NAM to the "free trader" fold this month.
118 posted on 01/17/2006 10:05:42 PM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm millions richer, thanks to the revolutionary "free trade" system--Jaing Zemin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
You must be a rich, overcharging socialist

Are you talking about Tony Blair, VIP in the Socialist Internationale, and firm advocate of "free trade" and the WTO? Or how about Pascal Lamy? He's a rich overcharging socialist, elected president of the WTO.
119 posted on 01/17/2006 10:07:37 PM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm millions richer, thanks to the revolutionary "free trade" system--Jaing Zemin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Since you only parrot the WTO and their "member states", I don't think so.All of the countries yelling about US farm policy subsidize their own farmers, so it can't be that you're against subsidies.

I'm against all subsidies.

One can only assume you have a deeper underlying animosity towards Americans.

That's funny, because you're the one who wants Americans to pay more.

120 posted on 01/17/2006 10:45:22 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Stop associating with Commies and we'll stop mentioning that you associate with Commies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson