Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It's Hillary presidency, Bush told
Insight ^ | 17 January 2006

Posted on 01/16/2006 4:38:45 PM PST by Aussie Dasher

President Bush's advisers are resigned to the Democratic capture of the White House in 2008, according to senior Republican sources close to the White House.

GOP sources said White House strategists have attempted to persuade Mr. Bush that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, New York Democrat and her party’s current front-runner to be the next presidential nominee, cannot be defeated in 2008. Bush strategists said the president should instead focus on seeking to retain the Republican majority in both houses of Congress in 2006 and 2008.

"There is nobody in the White House that will openly say we lost the presidency in 2008," a senior GOP source said. "But while the Democrats are completely focused on 2008, the White House has been completely aloof."

The strategists have argued that given the forecasts of a downturn in the economy, crises with China and Iran, Mrs. Clinton would be besieged with major problems that would ensure a one-term presidency, the sources said.

The strategists have pointed out that Mr. Bush, given the failing health of Vice President Dick Cheney, does not have a natural successor. Recently, Mr. Cheney, who suffers from heart problems, was rushed to the hospital because he had difficulties in breathing.

The sources said the strategists have assessed that Mrs. Clinton would easily win the Democratic leadership and the subsequent race for president. They said Mr. Bush has pledged to campaign vigorously for any GOP presidential nominee.

Administration sources said Mr. Bush has discussed the prospect of a Clinton presidency. But they asserted that the president has focused on the 2006 elections for Congress and the need to maintain the GOP majority.

"If we lost our majority in Congress, then the president immediately becomes a lame duck," an administration source said. "So, the talk of 2008 is not only premature, it's harmful."


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; bravosierra; bs; claptrap; crap; damnlie; defeatism; dopeydems; garbage; georgewbush; hillary2008; hitlery; hrc; jezebel; liberalwetdreams; noway; presidenthildebeast; steamingpile; whataload
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 461-474 next last
To: Aussie Dasher

Uh, I don't want this administration worrying about winning the Presidency in 2008. That should be the problem of some other group of Republican. Bush's guys should just focus on their present situations.


161 posted on 01/16/2006 5:48:17 PM PST by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775
Meanwhile today, WH spokesperson Scott McClellend announced that GW will seek a run in 2008 saying that "He realizes that the Democrats were right and he stole the 2000 election, so that 2008 will be his official second term." Leading Democratic canidates were so busy having an orgasmic adreniline dump could no longer be reached for comment. /sarcasm on/made up whole thing if you want me to source it.LOL!

LOVE IT !

162 posted on 01/16/2006 5:49:30 PM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Historically, it's a total long shot.

I mean, if we let HIM in, then we're going to have to seriously consider HITLERY, because she IS a Junior Senator from New York, no matter HOW deep in denial we happen to be about her...

Nope. In my precious little world, our next President will be a GOP Governor from a Red state, or even a Blue state, where s/he's suffered long enough. (And Ah-nold ain't even in the mix, as he's foreign-born and can't be President, Thank Goodness!)


163 posted on 01/16/2006 5:51:25 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

I've said and written it over and over again.

Hillary, McCain or Giuliani.

Only these two Republicans have a chance to beat Hillary.


164 posted on 01/16/2006 5:51:31 PM PST by Sabramerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irish Eyes
This story has clearly been planted either by someone wanting to a) energize the conservative masses b) energize the left-wing masses. or c) Energize Both !
Probably in both cases to increase donations !
165 posted on 01/16/2006 5:52:33 PM PST by Reily (Reilly (Dr Doom))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: princess leah

Rudy will run for the Senate seat in NY. End of both clinton's.


166 posted on 01/16/2006 5:56:46 PM PST by RetSignman (( HELP...I'm trapped between these curved things))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I heard her yelling with her abrasive voice today at the MLK event and wondered who would EVER vote for her. What does she have to offer in reality????


167 posted on 01/16/2006 5:57:24 PM PST by BonnieJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican
Hillary will win without active, vigorous opposition. The Fifth Column is already firmly in her camp. But unless the reason for this article is that "The Mena Deal" is actually in play and the Bush Family is going to secretly support Hillary against McCain or Giuliani, we had all better be prepared to lend those two whatever aid we can and not write them off as "too liberal for a true conservative like me!"

Unless the government we end up with under a 2008 Republican would not differ substantially from what we would get under Queen Hillary. In that case, never mind. ;)

168 posted on 01/16/2006 5:57:48 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves ("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: BonnieJ

The only thing she has to offer is a woman as president. There are lots of women who want to see that, I guess, but hate her.

Also, a few Clintonistas want a rerun. LOL


169 posted on 01/16/2006 5:58:59 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

170 posted on 01/16/2006 5:59:04 PM PST by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

171 posted on 01/16/2006 6:00:13 PM PST by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican
Think about some Fresh young blood. How about JD Hayworth?

sw

172 posted on 01/16/2006 6:00:54 PM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: al baby
Hillary's nomination, if it happens, will galvanize millions of GOP volunteers. Count on me.

Hell even id vote Republican then

Ditto

173 posted on 01/16/2006 6:02:11 PM PST by afnamvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

I believe Bush would much prefer Hillary win then either McCain or Giuliani.

The same way that Hillary prayed for a Bush win while giving an award winning performance in support of Kerry.


174 posted on 01/16/2006 6:05:06 PM PST by Sabramerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
The story is crap. There is no way that anyone can know two and 3/4 years before an election who is going to win.

In 1989 Bush 41 looked unbeatable. IN 1991 Bush 41 looked unbeatable with a 90 percent job approval rating.

But one thing is certain... Hillary is attacking bush and moveing to the far Left.

NO politician changes a strategy that is working

HIllary was supporting the PResident and the war in Iraq. Suddenly she is attacking bush non stop? She has in the last two weeks changed her strategy... Why?

It is pretty simple. She has lost the support of the Democratic base. Imaging the following.... while home for Christmas Vacation Nancy Pelosi was booed in ther own District* at a Democratic meeting where she spoke. The base of the Democratic party is mad at Nancy Pelosi for being too conservative. Can you imagine how mad they are at Hillary?

The truth is Hillary is having trouble getting the support of the base and she can't win the Democratic nomination in 2008 with out the support of the DEmocratic Base. The Clintonistas are trying to counter the opposition to Hillary, by doing the same thing they did to nominate Kerry. The are trying to create the image that Hillary can win the presidency!!!.

The truth is she can not even be sure of getting the Democratic nomiation. And unless she moves far to the left she will not get the nomination. That is why HIllary in the last few weeks has taken a very sharp left turn.

The first rule of Politics is

Get the suport of the base then run like heck for the center

HIllary tried to start at the center before she acquired the base. The Democratic Base thinks both Bill and HIllary are at best DINOs. Some Democrats think that the base will support a candidate they think can win. That is the reason for this story. That is not the case. They destered Dean to go with Kerry becuase Kerry was going to beat Bush. Kerry got beat. They are not buying that same act twice. The base wants a true leftist.

The base wants a lefist candidate. And they think Hillary is a DINO.

Hillary will have to move so far left to get the nominatin that she will have no chance in the general election.

I look for Hillary at the last moment to withdraw from the Presidential primaries. Then try to pick up the pieces after a full blown leftist is defeated in 2008.

I think Hillary will try to pull a Nixon and run in 2012 after a leftist has been massively defeated in 2008.

Unless something drastic happens niether 2006 or 2008 will be a good year for Democrats.

175 posted on 01/16/2006 6:07:35 PM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spectre

Hillary is a deadly political combination. A politician and a celebrity.

Only a similar combination can beat her.

Only two Republicans fit the bill. The only two that were the subject of movies. The only two who are popular TV guests whose names are known by people who know no politicians.


176 posted on 01/16/2006 6:08:11 PM PST by Sabramerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

This sounds like more Dick Morris prattle.


177 posted on 01/16/2006 6:09:00 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
This is a bunch of BS. IIRC, there was another completely bogus article recently in Insight that said Bush was blaming Cheney and Rummy for his decision to invade Iraq. Bush appeared to respond to that article a few weeks later by saying it was his decision to invade Iraq and he takes full responsibility for that decision.

This article is totally wrong. Hillary can't win any of the states Bush won in 2004, and she would struggle to win some of the states that Kerry won, e.g., Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. If George Allen runs a good campaign he'll beat her like a copper kettle drum; I think 53-46 in the popular vote.

178 posted on 01/16/2006 6:12:22 PM PST by carl in alaska (Kerry did not invent treason, but he invented the use of treason as a democrat political strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
yawn.... typical liberal bs.... they "feel" like it should be hillary's therefore it "will" be hillary's election....

you all know hillary...her mother (an avid mountaineer and psychic) named her in the future for Sir Edmund Hillary's great ascent... with vistas almost as broad as her a$$.

179 posted on 01/16/2006 6:16:13 PM PST by Dick Vomer (liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabramerican
You might be right..although, these days, John McCain would be better suited as a VP for Hillary. JMHO.

sw

180 posted on 01/16/2006 6:18:30 PM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 461-474 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson