Posted on 01/16/2006 8:08:09 AM PST by az4vlad
Almost 43 years after Martin Luther King, Jr. delivered his famous “I Have a Dream” speech, “separate but equal” still exists in Maricopa County, Arizona.
Under the guise of multiculturalism, the Presiding Judge of the Maricopa County Superior Court, Barbara Mundell, has set up separate race-based courts for defendants convicted of aggravated DUI’s. Defendants who speak Spanish are sent to their own Hispanic court, which is conducted by Judge Mundell in Spanish. Prosecutors, defense attorneys, probation officers, and members of the public must ask for headphones, if available, to have the proceedings translated into English. Very little is recorded, so it is impossible to determine afterwards with accuracy such things as the circumstances surrounding a decision to sentence a defendant to jail for violating probation.
Native Americans are segregated into their own court, and are required to show up together on one designated day each month. They are required to participate in sweat lodges and talking circles, regardless of whether their tribe historically participated in such activities. Some of the Native American and Hispanic DUI defendants have objected to the separate courts. All other DUI offenders, whether white, black, or other race or nationality, are assigned to standard DUI Court.
The local NAACP is outraged by this two-track system of justice. The Reverend Oscar Tillman, President of the Maricopa County NAACP, has joined Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas in calling for a halt to race-based courts. As the Maricopa County Attorney, Thomas took an oath to uphold the Constitution. He cannot stand by and allow prosecutors, as well as defendants and victims, to participate in an unconstitutional court. Separate but equal courts violate the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which states in part, “no state shall…deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Unless the government can demonstrate a “compelling” interest for treating races or nationalities differently, racial segregation by government is held to a strict scrutiny test, which almost always means it will be struck down as unconstitutional. Discrimination by race also violates the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Segregation by language, which can be subject to a lesser standard of scrutiny than segregation by race or nationality, is subject to strict scrutiny if it is clear that it is merely a pretext for separation by race or nationality. The Superior Court’s literature describes the DUI Courts as catering to different “cultures,” since regular DUI Court is for the “dominant class, white males.” The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, is amiss in providing grants to these separate courts.
Judge Mundell refuses to disband the race-based courts, claiming there are no constitutional issues involved since DUI Court covers probation, not a defendant’s initial trial. This is an incorrect interpretation of the law. Last year, the Supreme Court addressed the issue of separating prisoners by race in Johnson v. California. The court held that strict scrutiny applied there, as well as to the criminal justice system generally. Judge Mundell has provided no compelling reason why separate courts are necessary. Spanish-speaking DUI defendants are already provided interpreters throughout all aspects of the court system.
Good intentions do not trump the Constitution. Treating people differently for “cultural” reasons is not a compelling reason justifying discrimination. It is disturbing that Maricopa County Superior Court stereotypes all Native Americans and Hispanics with cultural alcohol problems.
The current naïve trend of emphasizing multiculturalism and diversity is a disguised re-appearance of the separate but equal segregation that Civil Rights leaders fought so hard in the 1950’s and early 1960’s to eradicate. The idea that non-Caucasians are in some way fundamentally different than Caucasians inevitably leads to feelings of superiority or inferiority. Instead of improving the lives of minorities in the U.S., emphasizing separateness by race and nationality has had the effect of hurting the integration of minorities into the American way of life, leading to a Balkanization of society. Separate treatment provides incentives for individuals to identify with allegedly oppressed groups rather than the nation as a whole. This results in competition among the various groups for their own portion of special treatment. It also creates resentment by Americans towards immigrants who enter the U.S., because those immigrants are encouraged not to assimilate.
Judge Mundell has stated that she would be happy to set up separate courts in other languages for African-Americans, Asians, and other ethnic groups if there were sufficient numbers to justify each court. This is not the answer; it is silly and would cost taxpayers an unnecessary amount of money. Racial segregation did not work in the past, and it will not work today.
The criminal justice system is the first place Americans should be assured of fair treatment. Martin Luther King, Jr. spoke in 1968 of his dream that his children would one day “live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” It is disturbing that Dr. King’s speech addressed the precise situation today in Maricopa County Superior Court. Judging on the basis of skin color constitutes state-sponsored discrimination and must be ended.
Rachel Alexander is a Deputy County Attorney with the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office. She is co-Editor of IntellectualConservative.com.
The idea that non-Caucasians are in some way fundamentally different than Caucasians inevitably leads to feelings of superiority or inferiority.
-----
And they are not. We are all equal under the law -- which does not preclude the possibility that certain demographics have higher occurances of problems. They are totally separate issues. Equality does not trump reality.
For people arrested for drinking too much tequila, oprime numero uno.
For people arrested for drinking martinis, press two.
For people arrested for drinking Dixie Beer or Rebel's Yell, shout "yee-ha!"
Seriously? If so, that's demented.
Holy separate-but-equal, Batman, what was she thinking?
We are in big trouble as a nation if we are not considered all equal before the law. These leftists have no respect for the constitution.
Divide and conquer, new massa a trickster.
system of general institutionalization of people under fabricated groups. You and I would have to go to "counseling". It's nuts.
These leftists have no respect for the constitution.
------
Well, its not only the leftists...just look at Bush's (and all of Washington) attitude toward compliance with immigration law...some must obey the law, and others have a free pass. Yes, we are in serious trouble. This is just ONE example of how people are NOT EQUAL UNDER THE LAW.
First there was regular court, then traffic court, then drug court, then family law court, now DUI court.
Pretty soon, there will be tobacco court, fast food court, failure-to-use-public-transportation court, failure-to-adapt-to-new-urbanism court, ad nauseum.
Before we know it, every newborn will find itself in some kind of gulag as soon as it takes its first breath.
It sounds to me like this "judge" engages in "profiling" in order to stereotype the defendants.
Just driving under the influence is bad enough, but if you're racing too, you should get a stiffer punishment!
ping
Well, its not only the leftists...just look at Bush's (and all of Washington) attitude toward compliance with immigration law...some must obey the law, and others have a free pass. Yes, we are in serious trouble. This is just ONE example of how people are NOT EQUAL UNDER THE LAW.
(let's forget about the victims)
(let's forget about the victims)
There are 2 million DUI arrests annually.
Statistically, very few of those involve any victims.
I see it as intended solely for language purposes (more efficient government?!? Wow!), but just to make sure, they'd better hope for numerous hispanics in the "Eenglish court" and numerous gringos in the "Spanish court".
Alcohol is frequently involved in automobile accidents.
Except in the bizarro world of the democratic party.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
