Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In New National Ad, ACLU Calls for Investigation
ACLU ^ | ACLU

Posted on 12/29/2005 8:57:12 AM PST by mosquitobite

NEW YORK – In a full-page advertisement in today's New York Times, the American Civil Liberties Union intensified its call for a special counsel to be appointed to determine whether President George W. Bush violated federal wiretapping laws by authorizing illegal surveillance.

The ACLU said President Bush's actions were a clear violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which was passed by Congress in response to revelations that former President Nixon was using "national security" claims to spy on American citizens he considered his "enemies."

"President Nixon was not above the law and neither is President Bush," said ACLU Executive Director Anthony D. Romero. "President Bush cannot use a claim of seeking to preserve our nation to undermine the rules that serve as our foundation. The Attorney General, who may have been involved with the formulation of this policy, must appoint a special counsel to let justice be served."

The advertisement, as well as a similar ACLU ad that ran last Thursday, was spurred by revelations earlier this month that Bush authorized the National Security Agency (NSA) to conduct electronic surveillance of people within the United States, including U.S. citizens, without a warrant.

The text of today's advertisement compares the words of President Nixon and President Bush, both of whom denied allegations of illegal spying. Next to the image of Nixon, the advertisement says: "He lied to the American people and broke the law." Below that is an image of President Bush, with the words, "So did he."

The FISA wiretapping law made it a crime to intentionally engage in electronic surveillance without court approval. The president clearly violated the law when he authorized, and then repeatedly reauthorized, the NSA to spy on Americans without first obtaining a warrant, the ACLU said.

In a formal request sent last week to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, the ACLU called for the appointment of "an outside special counsel with the independence to investigate and prosecute any and all criminal acts committed by any member of the Executive Branch in the warrantless electronic surveillance of people in the United States over the past four years by the NSA," noting that "such crimes are serious felonies and they need to be fully and independently investigated."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aclu; ads; aidandcomfort; bush; bushhaters; bushlied; fisa; gorelickwall; homelandsecurity; impeachedx42; nsa; nyt; patriotleak; spying; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last
To: quefstar
You got it right. I does absolutely no good to sit on their a@@ and do nothing. The JD should have been all over this the day after the NYT article broke the law by publishing classified material. Also the JD should have made a public announcement that they will investigate and prosecute the leaker and the NYT. What in the hell did we vote for.
61 posted on 12/29/2005 3:24:50 PM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mosquitobite

How can you preserve American Democracy if you're dead because of stupidity?


62 posted on 12/29/2005 5:36:17 PM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mosquitobite
The Slimes are running this ad in order to make this a legality of Presidential Powers issue and to protect their a*s and their source's (traitor's) a*s by claiming Whistle-Blowers status. The ACLU sent a letter to the AG's office requesting a special prosecutor because if the AG submits to this request then the AG becomes the investigated and can't pursue the leaking traitor and the Slimes. As long as the AG ignores this request the ACLU can't do crap and to get to the President will literally take an act of congress.
63 posted on 12/29/2005 5:53:42 PM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mosquitobite
Because its not about promoting a political agenda. It about preserving American Democracy. At the bottom of the ad - when was the last time you heard of the American Criminal Liars Union supporting anything conservative or Republican? Someone give me an example (other than the support of Rush's medical records case).
64 posted on 12/29/2005 5:58:46 PM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eureka!
Oh, there will be an investigation. But it won't be into W. It will be into the leaker(s). Plamegate was a fraud. This leak was not...

Agreed, hope the investigation into lead has already commenced - we may never know. Don't you just love the hypocrisy of the libs - all sanctimonious about who leaked Plame, but I have heard all the libs say this one is not about the leaker, but the fact that Bush must be impeached for listening in on the terrorists who want to kill us all!! What BS. I want something to happen to the NYT for committing this treasonous act by printing the story after Bush asked them not to - isn't that a treasonous act? Wonder what the Supreme court would say?

65 posted on 12/29/2005 6:02:21 PM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mosquitobite

They are freaking mad dogs and should be treated like mad dogs.


66 posted on 12/29/2005 6:04:42 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: polymuser
Just how long do we continue to allow the elitist, pervert neoMarxists in the ACLU, DNC, NEA, PETA, moveon, Tides Foundation, etc. to take America down? How much longer?

I am not an attorney, but as a man in the street I say it is treason or sedition. Unfortunately we are going to have to be attacked a couple more times for the sleepers in this country to wake up out of their stupor and prosecute the traitors. Fifth Column

67 posted on 12/29/2005 6:06:23 PM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: mosquitobite
He betrayed his country

So did they

And so did they

And now it's their turn

Help us stop the traitors from murdering more innocent people simply because they're American's

George W. Bush and the American people declared war on Al Qaeda and terrorism after September 11, 2001.  The ACLU and their allies in the Democrat Party and the old media declared war on George W. Bush and the American people.

Which side are you on?

68 posted on 12/29/2005 6:13:03 PM PST by Phsstpok (There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
You got it right. I does absolutely no good to sit on their a@@ and do nothing. The JD should have been all over this the day after the NYT article broke the law by publishing classified material. Also the JD should have made a public announcement that they will investigate and prosecute the leaker and the NYT. What in the hell did we vote for.

Why wasn't the DOJ on this case a year ago when Bush became aware the secrets had already been leaked to the NYT? Isn't that when he called Pinchie to the oval office and told him not to print it? That is when the DOJ should have commenced the investigation on WHO THE LEAKER WAS. It is most likely a Congresscritter and hence nothing will happen. Bush does not want to tangle with Congress. Seems to me that if the leaker was a NSA employee, a military person, or a civilian contrator, they would already have been prosecuted and the Admin would have seen to it that it got into the MSM to put the fear into other employees. BUT no not the Congress - that is why nothing has happened. Rockefeller Implicated in Plot to Leak Secret War Intel

69 posted on 12/29/2005 6:13:21 PM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: p23185
I hope the DOJ subpoenas the Slimes writer to give the name of the leaker as a part of an investigation then when he refuses lock him up for obstruction. The Slimes Miller gave in and so will Risen.
70 posted on 12/29/2005 6:28:41 PM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: mosquitobite

Get A CLU aclu!


71 posted on 12/29/2005 6:29:56 PM PST by Radix (Senator Kennedy actually criticized the President for acting as if he is above the Law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mosquitobite

When is the ACLU going to demand answers from Hillary and IRS abuses?


72 posted on 12/29/2005 6:31:53 PM PST by doug from upland (NEW YORK TIMES -- traitorous b*st*rds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
If they're not talking about them, then there are no court orders.

Sorry, that's too vague to fly.

73 posted on 12/29/2005 6:38:03 PM PST by The Red Zone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: An American Opinionist

Why don't you just post a link?


74 posted on 12/29/2005 6:39:58 PM PST by jokar (As Christmas Day 2005, google will no longer be my homepage. http://clusty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ligeia

"This should backfire on the ACLU and the rest of the seditious Democrats."

I predict this is going to blow up in their traitorous faces bigtime.


75 posted on 12/29/2005 6:42:58 PM PST by LibSnubber (Liberal democrats are domestic terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

Thank you for that powerful reminder. If the ACLU and its ilk have their way it could happen again tomorrow. And I suspect they would rejoice.


76 posted on 12/29/2005 7:17:27 PM PST by fullchroma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: The Red Zone

Unfortunately looks quite possibly so. "When we talk about X" is a very common American idiom for "In regards to X". Everybody knows that. Unless there is substantive context to these remarks to show otherwise it looks like this time the mud actually hit. Bush should have said nothing rather than this.


77 posted on 12/29/2005 8:52:55 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: p23185

Re#64 The investigation has commenced. IMHO, likely leakers are obviously the 'rat Senators. The judge who resigned from the FISA court is another possible source. Here's hoping that the DOJ puts a bulldog on it and he finds meat...


78 posted on 12/30/2005 8:31:09 AM PST by eureka! (Hey Lefties and 'Rats: Over 3 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: jokar

I am not sure what else to post or how to post my lik other than thiese reply's.


79 posted on 12/30/2005 9:53:54 AM PST by An American Opinionist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: An American Opinionist

Lik is link


80 posted on 12/30/2005 9:54:28 AM PST by An American Opinionist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson