Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USCCB reclassifies gay Western "Brokeback Mountain" after complaints
Catholic News Agency ^ | December 16, 2005

Posted on 12/16/2005 4:23:29 PM PST by NYer

Washington DC, Dec. 16, 2005 (CNA) - "Brokeback Mountain," originally rated L (limited adult audience) by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, has been reclassified as an O (morally offensive) after several pro-family organizations expressed concern for what they saw as an implicit endorsement of the USCCB film critic to the controversial gay western.

Brokeback Mountain is the story of two sheep-herding cowboys in Wyoming who begin a homosexual relationship on the range in the 1960s, and continue their affair even after they marry women.

The $13-million film garnered seven Golden Globe nominations from foreign film critics.

Director Ang Lee’s homosexual Western premiered last weekend in limited release. Showing in five theaters in New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco, the film grossed $544,549, averaging $108, 910 per theater. A wider release is slated on December 16, with a nationwide release in January.

In the original comment posted on the USCCB's website, the reviewer wrote that the Catholic Church "makes a distinction between homosexual orientation and activity," and that "Ennis and Jack's continuing physical relationship is morally problematic."

"While the actions taken by Ennis and Jack cannot be endorsed, the universal themes of love and loss ring true," said the original USCCB's review, which also called the movie "a serious contemplation of loneliness and connection."

"Looked at from the point of view of the need for love which everyone feels but few people can articulate, the plight of these guys is easy to understand while their way of dealing with it is likely to surprise and shock an audience," the original USCCB review said.

“Brokeback is the ‘Perfect Storm’ of Hollywood’s war on morality,” said Robert Knight, director of Concerned Women for America’s (CWA’s) Culture & Family Institute (CFI). “It combines high production values with a lowdown attack on morality. It’s a mockery of the Western genre embodied by every movie cowboy from John Wayne to Gene Autry to Kevin Costner. I can’t think of a more effective way to annoy and alienate most movie-going Americans than to show two cowboys lusting after each other and even smooching.

After several pro-life and pro-family websites strongly criticized the original review, the USCCB decided on Friday to change its classification, while still providing a very positive description of the film.

"Brokeback Mountain, originally rated L (limited adult audience, films whose problematic content many adults would find troubling) has been reclassified as an O (morally offensive). This has been done because the serious weight of the L rating -- which restricts films in that category to those who can assess from a Catholic perspective the moral issues raised by a movie -- is, unfortunately, misunderstood by many. Because, in this instance, there are some who are using the "L" rating to make it appear the Church -- or the USCCB -- position on homosexuality is ambiguous, the classification has been with revised specifically to address its moral content," says the new USCBB posting.

The new full review of the USCBB can be seen at:
http://www.usccb.org/movies/b/brokebackmountain.shtml


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: bishops; brokebackmountain; catholic; gay; hollywierd; homosexual; homosexualagenda; hornswaggling; morallyoffensive; movie; moviereview; pudding; usccb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last
To: OpusatFR

The snide tone towards those of us who criticised them fairly drips from the statement.


21 posted on 12/16/2005 4:37:23 PM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Birdlady

"Flaming Saddles"


22 posted on 12/16/2005 4:37:57 PM PST by Wristpin ("The Yankees have decided to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909

Oh, this could get good...


23 posted on 12/16/2005 4:38:22 PM PST by RichInOC (Last Tango in Wyoming: "Give me the sheepdip....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

Bareback Mountin'.


24 posted on 12/16/2005 4:39:05 PM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Finally! They can backpedal all they want, but the USCCB's initial rating of L was what, a slip up, a mistake? No, I think not. Did they actually think this would have gone under the radar? Are they that out of touch with what I thought was Catholic teaching?
25 posted on 12/16/2005 4:39:05 PM PST by voiceinthewind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wristpin

Saddlesore Mountin'?


26 posted on 12/16/2005 4:40:06 PM PST by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NYer

27 posted on 12/16/2005 4:40:11 PM PST by reagan_fanatic (Darwinism is a belief in the meaninglessness of existence - R. Kirk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

Actually "Love With the Proper Stranger" from the early sixties with Steve McQueen and Natalie Wood would probably qualify. Interestingly it was surpressed from a recently released McQueen collection.


28 posted on 12/16/2005 4:41:25 PM PST by Ozone34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

It could have been worse. They could have been having sex with the sheep!


29 posted on 12/16/2005 4:42:06 PM PST by allis_chalmers_b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allis_chalmers_b

That'l be part of the "extras" on the director's cut DVD.


30 posted on 12/16/2005 4:43:12 PM PST by Paladin2 (If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

USCCB aka navel gazers


31 posted on 12/16/2005 4:43:50 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret
What the hell is a sheep herding cowboy?

A shepherd
32 posted on 12/16/2005 4:44:09 PM PST by Liberty Valance ("Can't hide Freedom's song." ~ Starwise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
The snide tone towards those of us who criticised them fairly drips from the statement.

Exactly. These are the same "Catholics" who helped the Kennedys to grasp the real essence of the Church's pro-life position. Only simpletons like the evangelicals would think otherwise.

33 posted on 12/16/2005 4:45:02 PM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Okay, no matter what we make it, "Mountain" is going to be changed to "Mountin'." It's down to the first word now. Who will be victorious?


34 posted on 12/16/2005 4:45:40 PM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Good guys win again.

Got that right! It's the pew catholics who keep this group of renegade bishops in check.

35 posted on 12/16/2005 4:46:05 PM PST by NYer ("Socialism is the religion people get when they lose their religion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress
They're just called cowboys because they're wearing a hat and boots. Hopefully designer, right?

Wrong. they're called "cowboys" because this film is an attack on the icon of masculinity in western civilization.

Quite transparent if you ask me, and hard to miss. "'Cowboys' who herd sheep?" How much more obvious can they be? geez.

36 posted on 12/16/2005 4:48:11 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gordongekko909

Switchhittin Mountin


37 posted on 12/16/2005 4:49:25 PM PST by neodad (Rule Number 1: Be Armed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: NYer
I have personally rated this kind of movie NG for a Long time. NG = NO GOOD" and as a result I refuse to go, to it, or other movies by the same organization and people (directors, etc., actors, etc.) Yeh, I save a fortune on movie costs, but why should I give my money to those who are so willing to not only offend me, but to assult my sense of desency. I say, "screw them all."
38 posted on 12/16/2005 4:49:33 PM PST by rundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ozone34

How so? I haven't seen it, and I can't tell from the online reviews.


39 posted on 12/16/2005 4:49:51 PM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Opencrack Mountain!


40 posted on 12/16/2005 4:50:24 PM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson