Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Pentagon Breaks the Islam Taboo--Islam is an ideological engine of war
Frontpagemagazine ^ | 12-14-05 | Paul Sperry

Posted on 12/14/2005 5:26:37 AM PST by SJackson

The government asks the forbidden question: How closely related is Islamic terrorism to mainstream Islam itself?

Washington's policy-makers have been careful in the war on terror to distinguish between Islam and the terrorists. The distinction has rankled conservatives who see scarce difference.

A little-noticed speech by President Bush in October gave them some hope. In a major rhetorical shift, he described the enemy as "Islamic radicals" and not just "terrorists," although he still denies that radicalism has anything to do with their religion.

Now for the first time, a key Pentagon intelligence agency involved in homeland security is delving into Islam's holy texts to answer whether Islam is being radicalized by the terrorists or is already radical. Military brass want a better understanding of what's motivating the insurgents in Iraq and the terrorists around the globe, including those inside America who may be preparing to strike domestic military bases. The enemy appears indefatigable, even more active now than before 9/11.

Are the terrorists really driven by self-serving politics and personal demons? Or are they driven by religion? And if it's religion, are they following a manual of war contained in their scripture?

Answers are hard to come by. Four years into the war on terror, U.S. intelligence officials tell me there are no baseline studies of the Muslim prophet Muhammad or his ideological or military doctrine found at either the CIA or Defense Intelligence Agency, or even the war colleges.

But that is slowly starting to change as the Pentagon develops a new strategy to deal with the threat from Islamic terrorists through its little-known intelligence agency called the Counterintelligence Field Activity or CIFA, which staffs hundreds of investigators and analysts to help coordinate Pentagon security efforts at home and abroad. CIFA also supports Northern Command in Colorado, which was established after 9/11 to help military forces react to terrorist threats in the continental United States.

Dealing with the threat on a tactical and operational level through counterstrikes and capture has proven only marginally successful. Now military leaders want to combat it from a strategic standpoint, using informational warfare, among other things. A critical part of that strategy involves studying Islam, including the Quran and the hadiths, or traditions of Muhammad.

"Today we are confronted with a stateless threat that does not have at the strategic level targetable entities: no capitals, no economic base, no military formations or installations," states a new Pentagon briefing paper I've obtained. "Yet political Islam wages an ideological battle against the non-Islamic world at the tactical, operational and strategic level. The West's response is focused at the tactical and operation level, leaving the strategic level -- Islam -- unaddressed."

So far the conclusions of intelligence analysts assigned to the project, who include both private contractors and career military officials, contradict the commonly held notion that Islam is a peaceful religion hijacked or distorted by terrorists. They've found that the terrorists for the most part are following a war-fighting doctrine articulated through Muhammad in the Quran, elaborated on in the hadiths, codified in Islamic or sharia law, and reinforced by recent interpretations or fatwahs.

"Islam is an ideological engine of war (Jihad)," concludes the sensitive Pentagon briefing paper. And "no one is looking for its off switch."

Why? One major reason, the briefing states, is government-wide "indecision [over] whether Islam is radical or being radicalized."

So, which is it? "Strategic themes suggest Islam is radical by nature," according to the briefing, which goes on to cite the 26 chapters of the Quran dealing with violent jihad and the examples of the Muslim prophet, who it says sponsored "terror and slaughter" against unbelievers.

"Muhammad's behaviors today would be defined as radical," the defense document says, and Muslims today are commanded by their "militant" holy book to follow his example. It adds: Western leaders can no longer afford to overlook the "cult characteristics of Islam."

It also ties Muslim charity to war. Zakat, the alms-giving pillar of Islam, is described in the briefing as "an asymmetrical war-fighting funding mechanism." Which in English translates to: combat support under the guise of tithing. Of the eight obligatory categories of disbursement of Muslim charitable donations, it notes that two are for funding jihad, or holy war. Indeed, authorities have traced millions of dollars received by major jihadi terror groups like Hamas and al-Qaida back to Saudi and other foreign Isamic charities and also U.S. Muslim charities, such as the Holy Land Foundation.

According to the Quran, jihad is not something a Muslim can opt out of. It demands able-bodied believers join the fight. Those unable -- women and the elderly -- are not exempt; they must give "asylum and aid" (Surah 8:74) to those who do fight the unbelievers in the cause of Allah.

In analyzing the threat on the domestic front, the Pentagon briefing draws perhaps its most disturbing conclusions. It argues the U.S. has not suffered from scattered insurgent attacks -- as opposed to the concentrated and catastrophic attack by al-Qaida on 9-11 -- in large part because it has a relatively small Muslim population. But that could change as the Muslim minority grows and gains more influence.

The internal document explains that Islam divides offensive jihad into a "three-phase attack strategy" for gaining control of lands for Allah. The first phase is the "Meccan," or weakened, period, whereby a small Muslim minority asserts itself through largely peaceful and political measures involving Islamic NGOs -- such as the Islamic Society of North America, which investigators say has its roots in the militant Muslim Brotherhood, and Muslim pressure groups, such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations, whose leaders are on record expressing their desire to Islamize America.

In the second "preparation" phase, a "reasonably influential" Muslim minority starts to turn more militant. The briefing uses Britain and the Netherlands as examples.

And in the final jihad period, or "Medina Stage," a large minority uses its strength of numbers and power to rise up against the majority, as Muslim youth recently demonstrated in terrorizing France, the Pentagon paper notes.

It also notes that unlike Judaism and Christianity, Islam advocates expansion by force. The final command of jihad, as revealed to Muhammad in the Quran, is to conquer the world in the name of Islam. The defense briefing adds that Islam is also unique in classifying unbelievers as "standing enemies against whom it is legitimate to wage war."

Right now political leaders don't understand the true nature of the threat,\ it says, because the intelligence community has yet to educate them. They still think Muslim terrorists, even suicide bombers, are mindless "criminals" motivated by "hatred of our freedoms," rather than religious zealots motivated by their faith. And as a result, we have no real strategic plan for winning a war against jihadists.

Even many intelligence analysts and investigators working in the field with the Joint Terrorism Task Forces have a shallow understanding of Islam.

"I don't like to criticize our intelligence services, because we did win the Cold War," says a Northern Command intelligence official. "However, all of these organizations have made only limited progress adjusting to the current threat or the sharing of information."

Why? "All suffer heavily from political correctness," he explains.

PC still infects the Pentagon, four years after jihadists hit the nation's military headquarters.

"A lot of folks here have a very pedestrian understanding of Islam and the Islamic threat," a Pentagon intelligence analyst working on the project told me. "We're getting Islam 101, and we need Islam 404."

The hardest part of formulating a strategic response to the threat is defining Islam as a political and military enemy. Once that psychological barrier has been crossed, defense sources tell me, the development of countermeasures -- such as educating the public about the militant nature of Islam and exploiting "critical vulnerabilities" or rifts within the Muslim faith and community -- can begin.

"Most Americans don't realize we are in a war of survival -- a war that is going to continue for decades," the Northcom official warns.

It remains to be seen, however, whether our PC-addled political leaders would ever adopt such controversial measures.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: cultofdeath; gwot; islam; islamism; islamofascism; jihad; jihadinamerica; kkkoran; koran; muslim; paulsperry; pentagon; quran; rop; sperry; stumblingonthetruth; terrorism; terrorist; trop; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

1 posted on 12/14/2005 5:26:38 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

---------------------------

2 posted on 12/14/2005 5:27:54 AM PST by SJackson (There's no such thing as too late, that's why they invented death. Walter Matthau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

And if it's religion, are they following a manual of war contained in their scripture?

Hmmm...ya think so? I'm glad Captain Obvious is finally on the case.


3 posted on 12/14/2005 5:30:27 AM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"Muhammad's behaviors today would be defined as radical,"

Ya' think?

4 posted on 12/14/2005 5:30:45 AM PST by Michael Goldsberry (Lt. Bruce C. Fryar USN 01-02-70 Laos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

'Bout time.


5 posted on 12/14/2005 5:31:04 AM PST by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Today we are confronted with a stateless threat that does not have at the strategic level targetable entities: no capitals, no economic base,,"

If they are really this ignorant, they are not even yet on the learning curve.

6 posted on 12/14/2005 5:31:31 AM PST by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Now for the first time, a key Pentagon intelligence agency involved in homeland security is delving into Islam's holy texts to answer whether Islam is being radicalized by the terrorists or is already radical. Military brass want a better understanding of what's motivating the insurgents in Iraq and the terrorists around the globe, including those inside America who may be preparing to strike domestic military bases.

It's now 4 years since 9/11 and they're just NOW looking at the Quran to see if Islamic terrorists might be following Islam accurately?!

7 posted on 12/14/2005 5:32:05 AM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chaguito

well, apparantly they are really this ignorant. gosh i feel so much safer now, thank god.


8 posted on 12/14/2005 5:33:25 AM PST by son of caesar (son of caesar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"Today we are confronted with a stateless threat that does not have at the strategic level targetable entities: no capitals, no economic base, no military formations or installations," states a new Pentagon briefing paper I've obtained.

Mecca and Medina are the capitols.

9 posted on 12/14/2005 5:34:24 AM PST by Terabitten (Illegal immigration causes Representation without Taxation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jan in Colorado; Dark Skies; Fred Nerks; Cornpone; Former Dodger; AmericanArchConservative; ...
Seeing the light PING.
10 posted on 12/14/2005 5:34:33 AM PST by USF (I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

bumpers


11 posted on 12/14/2005 5:44:08 AM PST by Sometimes A River (Your hands and feet are mangoes, but you're gonna be a genius anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW
They have known all along, just are now saying publicly.
12 posted on 12/14/2005 5:48:33 AM PST by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten

Maybe they will wake up to this in a moment of clarity...


13 posted on 12/14/2005 5:51:59 AM PST by weegee (Christmas - the holiday that dare not speak its name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mariabush
They have known all along, just are now saying publicly.

I'm not sure which ways bothers me the most. Before the Iraq invasion I had serious doubts about it, not on the basis of the peace nuts that are clueless regarding evil but on the basis that Islam is inherently and aggressively violent and not very compatible with democracy. I doubted our exit strategy of building a democracy in Iraq (although it's gone far better than I ever expected so far). The problem is, the only way for democracy to flourish is to move people away from Islam...something that seems unlikely for our, or any, government to be able to do. So if they understood this before starting then I wonder at their judgment, if they didn't understand it at the beginning I wonder at their preparation. Of course, at this point we're in with both feet and the only way out MUST be through victory.

14 posted on 12/14/2005 5:56:17 AM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

QUOTE: "Western leaders can no longer afford to overlook the "cult characteristics of Islam."

Perhaps a Kool-Aid solution?


15 posted on 12/14/2005 5:56:44 AM PST by heldmyw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Four years into the war on terror, U.S. intelligence officials tell me there are no baseline studies of the Muslim prophet Muhammad or his ideological or military doctrine found at either the CIA or Defense Intelligence Agency, or even the war colleges.

This is either gross negligence or kowtowing to political correctness. Neither is a legitimate excuse for this dereliction of duty.

16 posted on 12/14/2005 5:59:00 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

btt


17 posted on 12/14/2005 6:01:32 AM PST by dennisw (You shouldn't let other people get your kicks for you - Bob Dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highlander_UW
the only way for democracy to flourish is to move people away from Islam...

True, but democracy can serve this end. Democracy contradicts the caliphate. Hopefully the acceptance of democracy will habituate Mohammedans to disregarding other Mohammedan teachings.

18 posted on 12/14/2005 6:02:15 AM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
P/C is undoubtably a factor in the fight against Islam.

The fact that there are over 1,000,000,000 [ONE BILLION] of these human defectives running around in the world (approximately 1,000,000 [ONE MILLION] in the U.S.A.) may, undoubtedly, be a factor in why politicians, world wide, are kissing their backsides.


Now ... How does one get one billion in one place, and at one time, for an X-Ray photograph?





19 posted on 12/14/2005 6:04:59 AM PST by G.Mason (Others have died for my freedom; now this is my mark ... Marine Corporal Jeffrey Starr, KIA 04-30-05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan

OMG, they are just now looking into this? Are these people that ignorant to reality?

Good lord you idiots.....read a few friggin history books. It might clue you old fools in to Mohammad the "killing machine" and his followers.


20 posted on 12/14/2005 6:07:23 AM PST by MadeInAmerica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson