Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is the Pentagon spying on Americans?
NBC News ^ | Dec. 13, 2005 | Lisa Myers, Douglas Pasternak, Rich Gardella and the NBC Investigative Unit

Posted on 12/13/2005 5:16:49 PM PST by ADemocratNoMore

Is the Pentagon spying on Americans? Secret database obtained by NBC News tracks ‘suspicious’ domestic groups.

WASHINGTON - A year ago, at a Quaker Meeting House in Lake Worth, Fla., a small group of activists met to plan a protest of military recruiting at local high schools. What they didn't know was that their meeting had come to the attention of the U.S. military.

A secret 400-page Defense Department document obtained by NBC News lists the Lake Worth meeting as a “threat” and one of more than 1,500 “suspicious incidents” across the country over a recent 10-month period.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: dod; enemywithin; fifthcolumn; homelandsecurity; leaks; lisamyers; msm; nbcnews; oops; spying; treason; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last
To: razorgirl
Look at the reg and look at what the groups say are their objectives. It IS subversion. It is intended to interfere with the military.

God forbid others would be as blind as you.

Protests are protests, what they are doing goes beyond that and intends to hamper the military. Just go read their websites.

41 posted on 12/13/2005 6:02:49 PM PST by Doctor Raoul (Raoul's First Law of Journalism: BIAS = LAYOFFS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ADemocratNoMore

I have attended the Hollywood protests. I can vouch for the military's need to conduct surveylance on the participants. Quite frankly, I'm very pleased to hear that at least one government agency actually gives a damn, and is checking out some of these fringe anarchists.

Why shouldn't the U.S. government check out groups that support our enemies? Is our government supposed to allow these folks to network with the worlds leading terrorists, making plans that would harm U.S. citizens?

BTW, someone ask NBC if they would have been happy to have someone checking out Timothy McVeigh two months before he detonated a bomb in front of the Murah Building.

While you're at it, ask them if they'd have been bothered to have the military surveiling the 09/11 terrorists before they put their plan into action.

Oh it's real sensational to frame the military as the bad guy, but why is NBC so cozy with those in need of watching?

Did NBC outbid someone for the rights to terrorist coverage in the U.S.?

What NBC doesn't have the class or brains to acknowledge, is that we do have subversives here in this nation who are networking to defeat the U.S. Hell, our own Senators and Congressmen do the same thing.

Go ahead. Keep an eye on them. I sure wish someone would.

NBC, this is just pathetic.


42 posted on 12/13/2005 6:02:52 PM PST by DoughtyOne (MSM: Public support for war waining. 403/3 House vote against pullout vaporizes another lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorgirl

People who wish to prohibit the US military from recruiting are among the class enemy and must be stopped.


43 posted on 12/13/2005 6:05:32 PM PST by muawiyah (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Galveston Grl
Reno designed law enforcement courses outlining the grave danger presented by the "extreme right" and in the meantime anyone who was not politically correct was labeled as "extreme right" by the Clinton machine. Clinton fingered Rush as the inspiration for the Oklahoma bombing...

Timothy McVeigh said that he was an admirer of Rush Limbaugh .. so does that make Rush a supporter of terrorism? Much of the PA was written by the Clinton admin.. a watered-down version of it was passed as an anti-terrorism law in 1996. I'm not an admirer of Feingold, but I think everyone should demand that their reps take a closer look at some of the provisions and maybe tell them not to be so eager to hand over our civil liberties to the government. Times change, and a different admin. will be in power one day - and people may regret handing the executive branch dictatorial authority.

44 posted on 12/13/2005 6:05:52 PM PST by razorgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ADemocratNoMore

Will these "law breaking" revealers of government secrets be treated the same as those in the Pame Affair???????????????????????????


45 posted on 12/13/2005 6:06:20 PM PST by SampleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ADemocratNoMore

bttt


46 posted on 12/13/2005 6:07:32 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorgirl

You need to get a grip. The groups under watch are very pro Palestinian, very pro South American subversive (Marxist) radicals, very pro Philipenes insurgents... you name it these folks back it if it's anti-U.S. or it's allies.

They are very sympathetic to the idea that the U.S. is the problem in Iraq. That should tell you what you need to know.

A.N.S.W.E.R. is one of the groups. Spend a few hours checking out their web sites and the people they network with.


47 posted on 12/13/2005 6:07:32 PM PST by DoughtyOne (MSM: Public support for war waining. 403/3 House vote against pullout vaporizes another lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: razorgirl

God help us when subversion, espionage and sabotage against the United States is considered little more than "protest".


48 posted on 12/13/2005 6:07:44 PM PST by muawiyah (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: razorgirl
Subversion

Advocating, causing, or attempting to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the armed forces of the United States or by Department of Defense civilian personnel with the intent to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale,
or discipline of such armed forces. During time of war, subversion additionally includes:

(l) making or conveying false reports or false statements with the intent to interfere with the operation or success of the armed forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies; and

(2) willfully obstructing or attempting to obstruct the recruitment or enlistment service of the United States, to the injury of the United States (see 18 USC 2387-88).

49 posted on 12/13/2005 6:07:50 PM PST by Doctor Raoul (Raoul's First Law of Journalism: BIAS = LAYOFFS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ADemocratNoMore
I don't recall NBC getting bent out of shape about Klintoon's grudge against so-called "militia" groups in the 90s.
50 posted on 12/13/2005 6:07:58 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorgirl
Since there's no record whatsoever concerning anything McVeigh might have said about Rush Limbaugh, your post must beconsidered to be seditionist treason of the worst sort.

You are trying to mislead us all into believing that rebellion against the United States is mere political discussion protected by the First.

51 posted on 12/13/2005 6:09:33 PM PST by muawiyah (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
> Surely the US military did not give a flying hoot whether a Quaker assembly in Lakeland Florida was going to protest military recruiting at high schools.

More likely, NBC chose the most ridiculous example they could dig up in order to tarnish the whole effort. On the other hand, what it tells me is that if they have the resources to keep tabs on a group of Quakers, I think the other, more high-value targets would not be ignored.
52 posted on 12/13/2005 6:11:05 PM PST by ADemocratNoMore (Jeepers, Freepers, where'd 'ya get those sleepers?. Pj people, exposing old media's lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul
Look at the reg and look at what the groups say are their objectives. It IS subversion. It is intended to interfere with the military.

The military doesn't act on its own, it's under the command of the President. The President does have to answer to the people via their reps - and people protesting, whether you like it or not, is their right under the Constitution - what the POTUS takes an oath to uphold and defend.

That's the way it is in a democratic republic. The military is subordinate to the government, not the other way around.

53 posted on 12/13/2005 6:11:18 PM PST by razorgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: razorgirl

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/DODAntiWarProtestDatabaseTracker.pdf

Page 6 First entry
Internet discussion board encourages violence against recruiters.

So they should not pay attention and close their eyes to threats such as this?


54 posted on 12/13/2005 6:13:39 PM PST by listenhillary ("Mainstream media" is creating it's own reality~everything sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged
Releasing classified documents is a crime just like human biological experiments are a crime.

No one (including NBC) has the right to commit a crime. That principle is the basis of our justice system.

55 posted on 12/13/2005 6:13:45 PM PST by Rapscallion (They're not Americans; they're democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ADemocratNoMore

Bump.


56 posted on 12/13/2005 6:14:27 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ADemocratNoMore

Does General Electric still own NBC? If so, they need to be immediately removed from any pentagon bid lists.


57 posted on 12/13/2005 6:15:03 PM PST by McGavin999 (Reporters write the truth, Journalists write stories.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ADemocratNoMore
“I mean, we're based here at the Quaker Meeting House,” says Truth Project member Marie Zwicker, “and several of us are Quakers.”

Sounds more like a political organization to me. I wonder if they get tax free status?

58 posted on 12/13/2005 6:16:09 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ADemocratNoMore

when is the government going to start throwing people in jail for leaking secret documents?


59 posted on 12/13/2005 6:16:20 PM PST by conservative physics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorgirl
As I said, the government has NO right to harass these people or screw with their lives in any way as long as they do nothing illegal. The government has no right to harass or intimidate these people, incarcerate them, conveniently decide to audit their taxes every year for the next five years....none of that. They have every right to keep tabs on them if they have reason to believe they can become a threat.

I have a huge problem with the government holding US citizens in incarceration without affording them their legal rights. But, that's not what this article is about. The article is about the government monitoring anything they deem as a threat or a potential threat or something that could later turn into a potential threat. I seriously doubt this is a new thing.

Hitlery would probably feel free to cart you away in the middle of the night if you said the wrong thing....not just keep tabs on you to make sure you're not planning on blowing something up or something (which is probably what they're doing now).
60 posted on 12/13/2005 6:17:19 PM PST by ark_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson