Plus, of course, Republicans don't have that critical 100-seat majority, so they just can't do anything but spend a lot more every damn year, and waste nearly all of it.
Posted on 12/13/2005 5:12:34 PM PST by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON - Congress won't address the growing reach of the alternative minimum tax this year, leaving more than 15 million individuals and families subject to its bite for the first time next year.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., told reporters Tuesday that legislation addressing the alternative minimum tax won't be completed this year. Lawmakers can act next year to make retroactive changes that ensure taxpayers don't pay more in 2006, but millions will start the year in its grasp.
The alternative minimum tax, designed to stop the wealthy from avoiding all taxation, threatens more middle class taxpayers every year because of inflation. The number of individuals and families opening their wallets to an alternative minimum tax liability is projected to jump from roughly 3.5 million this year to nearly 19 million next year.
Congress regularly erects barriers against the tax to prevent inflation and recent tax cuts from pushing middle class families onto the alternative minimum tax rolls. The most recent patch holding back the tax expires Dec. 31.
The House and Senate passed separate bills applying a temporary fix on the problem next year, reducing taxes for those affected by roughly $30 billion. Those bills have gotten stuck in a broader debate over tax policy, specifically a GOP effort to prevent tax cuts for capital gains and dividends from expiring at the end of 2008.
The investors' tax cuts have been the priority of Republican leaders, who hold out hope that Congress could still pass an extension before lawmakers break for the holidays.
Democrats say Republicans have their priorities wrong. "We should fix the AMT for 2006 and work to address it permanently before even thinking about cap gains," said Sen. Max Baucus (news, bio, voting record), D-Mont.
The expiration of the temporary patch means nearly 19 million individuals and families can expect to pay the alternative minimum tax next year. More than 15 million taxpayers would face the alternative minimum tax for the first time, most of then married couples. The extra taxes would come due in 2007 when returns must be filed to the Internal Revenue Service.
The alternative minimum tax exists as a second system of taxation that forces some individuals and families to figure their taxes twice and pay the higher amount. It's more likely to ensnare taxpayers who have multiple children or pay high state and local taxes.
It's frequently criticized, and a presidential panel on tax reform has said it should be abolished.
___
On the Net:
Internal Revenue Service: http://www.irs.gov
"the irony of the AMT is that it hits the red staters worse than the blue staters"
???- It hits worse in the states and localities with high tax rates and higher incomes on which those rates are levied [Inhale deep and start singing "New York, New York"]. And New York, especially NYC, is a "blue" location.
my mistake i meant blue states like my home state
How convenient. Yet, there's always time to push through a raise for themselves.
"Imagine that. They ran out of time. Yeah, Right!"
Lets see ... if a project I am working on has to be done before I go on vacation, I make a point of completing it or I delay my vacation.
GET THE F*CK BACK TO WORK!!!!! I don't care if they have to open their Christmas presents on the floor of the House/Senate ... GET 'ER DONE.
Better yet, how about a straight 10% flat tax with no exemptions.
And as much as it pains me, I like the AMT for the way it disproportionately impacts "blue" states whose representatives in Washington are the ones most strongly opposed to eliminating it.
(It makes me wish there were more Libertarian candidates availalable at election time.) The present batch of Republicans have shifted too far left for my liking.
Plus, of course, Republicans don't have that critical 100-seat majority, so they just can't do anything but spend a lot more every damn year, and waste nearly all of it.
Yeah? Who's gonna make 'em? Bush Jr. can't wait to sign all their new spending bills.
I don't know the history of this abomination. Which party gave birth to it in the first place? That would be the party worthy of most of the blame.
The AMT was enacted in 1969 so we can pretty much figure who pushed it through back then.
But, BOTH parties are responsible for not getting rid of this crap. They are so involved with trying to screw the other party that they do not have time to take care of these types of important issues.
Watch your wallet next year!!
More letters to my Republican congresscritters. More form letters back from them explaining how they already know how they will vote, thanking me for my useless opinion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.