Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is It Treason Yet?
GOP USA ^ | 12-09-05 | Joe Mariani - Commentary

Posted on 12/08/2005 7:56:07 PM PST by smoothsailing

Is It Treason Yet?

By Joe Mariani

December 9, 2005

Treason is defined, in part, as "giving aid and comfort" to the enemies of the United States, according to the Constitution (Article III, Section 3) (web site) and the United States Code (Title 18, Part I, Chapter 115, Section 2381). (web site) Yet the Constitution also states, in the First Amendment, (web site) that "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech." How do we distinguish between free speech and treason? Where do we draw the line? The answer may be found using that least-used resource: common sense.

I would submit that the elected leaders of this country have more responsibility than the rest of us to ensure that they give no aid and comfort to the enemy in time of war. With American troops risking their lives in daily battle on behalf of the nation, critical words from those in leadership positions carry greater weight than in peacetime, both with the enemy and with our own troops.

Yet the leaders of the Democratic Party consistently attack the war in Iraq with lies, from distorting the history of our confrontation with Saddam Hussein, (web site) to prevaricating about their own statements which led us to war, (web site) to defaming the character of every member of the Bush administration in turn. Worst of all, however, is the slander they spread about our troops.

The Chairman of the Democratic party, Howard Dean, said during a radio interview on 6 December (web site) that the "idea that we're going to win the war in Iraq is an idea which is just plain wrong." Does this statement not give "aid and comfort" to the enemy? The leader of a major political party, to which nearly half of all Americans belong, is telling the terrorists and insurgents in Iraq that they will win; that they will beat the United States.

Dean also said that, "this is the same situation we had in Vietnam," and in a certain sense, he's right. The beaten, demoralized North Vietnamese leadership was given new hope by certain American politicians and the press, to the point where they struggled on until America's liberals turned public opinion against the war. America was forced to withdraw from Vietnam in disgrace, having never lost a battle, by people just like Howard Dean. With his defeatist statements, Dean is giving our enemies the aid and comfort they need to keep fighting. How many Americans will die because of Dean's irresponsible remarks, made only to seek political advantage? Tell me why that's not treason.

Senator John Kerry (D-MA), the Democratic Party's most recent Presidential candidate, appeared on CBS' "Face the Nation" on 4 December (web site) to deface the American military. Speaking to interviewer Bob Schieffer, Kerry said that "there is no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, you know, women, breaking sort of the customs of the -- of -- the historical customs, religious customs." (And some people accuse GW Bush of being incoherent?) .

Does a United States Senator and former Presidential candidate accusing American soldiers of terrorizing women and children in the dead of night not give aid and comfort to the enemy? Just as he did during Vietnam, (web site) John Kerry is falsely accusing American troops of committing atrocities as a matter of normal course in an attempt to undermine support for the war among Americans. As a consequence -- intended or not -- he is yet again handing America's enemies an immense propaganda victory. How many potential terrorists will have their hatred of Americans fueled by Kerry's matter-of-fact statement that American soldiers are terrorising women and children in their homes at night, breaking cultural and religious taboos? Tell me why that's not treason.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) fully supports and endorses the recent statements of Representative John Murtha (D-PA), the ranking Democrat on the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee. Murtha has made a big splash among the anti-war faction by calling for an immediate -- within six months -- pullout from Iraq. On 1 December, Murtha told a group of leading Pennsylvania citizens (web site) that America would be forced to abandon Iraq within a year because the troops are "broken, worn out" and "living hand to mouth." Murtha is hailed as a hero in the media for suddenly changing his mind about the war in Iraq, but called it "unwinnable" and stated that "we cannot prevail... with the policy we have today," while urging President Bush to send even more troops in May 2004. (web site)

What a burst of enthusiasm Murtha's words must have engendered among our enemies! How much hope will they take from his proclamation that they are, in fact, winning the war? Despite fantastic losses, and despite earning the enmity of the Iraqi people, the terrorists and Saddam supporters in Iraq can now believe that if they just find the strength to hold on a little longer, they can push the hated United States out of Iraq. How many of the enemy will fight rather than surrender, because Pelosi and Murtha have told them they're winning? How does that not give the enemy aid and comfort? Is that not treason?

Not all Democrats follow the defeatist, destructive path of their leaders. But those ARE their leaders -- the Chairman of their party, their most recent Presidential candidate, their party leader in the House of Representatives. Some Democrat politicians have repudiated the statements of Dean, Kerry, Pelosi, Murtha and the rest... not because those remarks were vile, untrue and treasonous, but because the Democrats are afraid such openly anti-American statements might "harm efforts to win control of Congress next year," according to the Washington Post. (web site) The only way they can regain power is to hide their true feelings, and they know it. Treason, it seems, is still considered malapropos by some Democrats.

But not all.

-------------

Joe Mariani is a computer consultant born and raised in New Jersey. He now lives in Pennsylvania, where the gun laws are less restrictive and taxes are lower. Joe always thought of himself as politically neutral until he saw how far left the left had really gone after 9/11. His essays and links to articles are available at http://www.guardianwatchblog.com/

--------------------

Note -- The opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, and/or philosophy of GOPUSA.

NOTE: All (website) notations can be accessed by going to the GOP USA link at the top of this article-smoothsailing


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 109th; aidandcomfort; chairmandean; collaborators; cutandrun; dhpl; dnc; enemywithin; hangemhigh; murtha; patriotleak; pelosi; saboteurs; sedition; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 301-306 next last
To: Roscoe Karns

Glad I have broadband, or your posts would be painful to pull up. Great comedy, though.


181 posted on 12/09/2005 3:37:29 AM PST by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns
LOL. . .and so true. . .

That said. . .I am not a so-patient Repub. . .and would like to see the Repubs actually make the boom happen more quickly. . .and definitively. . .so for these 'rats'. . .there is no doubt. . .no hiding. . .pretending. . .faking their own truth;

. . . because the Dems will never acknowledge that the 'boom' ever happened and will blame the explosion heard as no more than the result of Teddy - missing his Malox. . .

182 posted on 12/09/2005 3:39:00 AM PST by cricket (No Freedom - No Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: writer33
If so, send me a check while I think about it!

LOL.

Keep me on the list, please. But, I can only pay you with this 'applicable to your budding satire' gem:

****

"A New York politician says comedians can't survive in Manhattan on the money they make telling jokes. So Assemblyman Adriano Espaillat is sponsoring a bill requiring comedy clubs to pay stand-up comics a minimum wage of up to $120 per weekend set."

;-)

183 posted on 12/09/2005 3:40:38 AM PST by beyond the sea (Murtha: Redeployment - What .......Surrender? // “Victory is not a strategy”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Only Congress can identify the "enemies of the United States", and for very good reason.

That is why I favor a formal declaration of war.
184 posted on 12/09/2005 3:43:56 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

Excellent!


185 posted on 12/09/2005 4:09:19 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: writer33

Excellent job!


186 posted on 12/09/2005 4:10:02 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns

Brilliant!!!!!


187 posted on 12/09/2005 4:15:09 AM PST by MagnoliaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
That is why I favor a formal declaration of war.

Ditto, but I'm quarrelling with your "treason was rampant and not prosecuted" phrase.

The Michael Moore faction are traitorous, but they are not guilty of treason.

188 posted on 12/09/2005 4:16:12 AM PST by Jim Noble (Non, je ne regrette rien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: writer33

Yes, "It's treason."


189 posted on 12/09/2005 4:16:30 AM PST by B4Ranch (No expiration date is on the Oath to protect America from all enemies, foreign and domestic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

"Treason doth not prosper, for what's the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason."


190 posted on 12/09/2005 4:18:01 AM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (MORE COWBELL! MORE COWBELL! (CLANK-CLANK-CLANK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns

Roscoe,

That was great!

Jarhead


191 posted on 12/09/2005 4:24:30 AM PST by Buffettfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

As Rush says all the time. What's good for the democrats is bad for the country and what's good for the country is bad for the democrats. The democrats will stoop to any depth to regain power including rooting for the enemy.


192 posted on 12/09/2005 4:26:48 AM PST by Buffettfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfhound777; smoothsailing

Very nicely put. My answer is yes. Our troops are actively engaged in defense of our national security, rooting out islamofascist or whatever we're going to call them-the enemy. The rats have told the enemy that our troops are terrorising innocents. However vaguely it was said, and whatever their motive, they have made our troops 'justifiable targets' in the enemy's eyes.

There hasn't been a damn thing to stop him from committing treason a second time.

Sadly and ashamedly, there's only one way to look at Kerry-

Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on me.

Yesterday, I was very, very mad.
I dreamt about Schultz last night.


193 posted on 12/09/2005 4:36:41 AM PST by freema (Proud Marine Mom-What fools they are who doubt the ability of liberty to triumph over despotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Am I missing something? The guy on the poster looks suspiciously like our impeached rapist potus! That can't be true, can it?


194 posted on 12/09/2005 4:50:17 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Celebrate Clinton Impeachment Day - Dec 19th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
You damn betcha it's treason!

It's time to reinstitute the death penalty for it too and have a few public hangings for it.

195 posted on 12/09/2005 4:55:13 AM PST by TigersEye (Peace had a chance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns

LOL!


196 posted on 12/09/2005 5:00:20 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim (Now that taglines are cool, I refuse to have one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
The Michael Moore faction are traitorous, but they are not guilty of treason.

How can a person be “traitorous” and not be committing treason?

“Section. 3.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.”

“Adhering to their enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” Seems to cover it pretty well.

197 posted on 12/09/2005 5:05:53 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Prost1

I am marking your words and holding every one in the hope this is ended.


198 posted on 12/09/2005 5:05:55 AM PST by freema (Proud Marine Mom-What fools they are who doubt the ability of liberty to triumph over despotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe Karns; Blurblogger

NICE WORK!!!!!


199 posted on 12/09/2005 5:16:42 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

It is treason. And I think the Dems are "outting" themselves, perfectly. They've been given a long rope by which to hang themselves. And they are. And Repubs doing a "bloodless" coup. We don't behead people in the US. The Dems support suicide. They are doing it to themselves, and with a glad hand from compassionate conservatism. Hot coals on the heads.


200 posted on 12/09/2005 5:17:08 AM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 301-306 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson