Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Support For Hillary Clinton Presidential Bid Falls To Lowest Level This Year
Rasmussen Reports ^ | November 30, 2005

Posted on 12/02/2005 5:33:02 PM PST by Clintonfatigued

If Hillary Clinton runs for President in 2008, just 25% of Americans say they would definitely vote for her. That's down five points over the past two weeks. It's also the lowest level of support measured for the former First Lady in 2005. (Review Trends).

Forty percent (40%) would definitely vote against Senator Clinton. That's little changed from two weeks ago. Rasmussen Reports has conducted a Hillary Meter poll every other week since April. Only once has the number who say they would definitely vote against Clinton been higher than it is now.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: beveryafraid; billclinton; clinton; communist; edwards; highertaxes; hildebeast; hillary; hillary2008; hillaryclinton; hitlery; ittakesabitch; ittakesavillageidiot; johnedwards; johnkerry; kerry; leftist; liberal; michaelmoorewhore; moveonorgwhore; notaboveappointments; raisetaxes; socialism; socialist; sumohillary; taxincrease; wickedwitch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: fieldmarshaldj
Thanks for the info. Bayh and Warner are the only shot tey have. Let's hope the dems rip each other to shreds (Hillary, Gore, Kerry, Bayh, Warner, Feingold) -wow. Think of all that money being wasted by the libs and the infighting.

Hopefully that will enable us to get a relatively conservative GOP candidate in.

61 posted on 12/02/2005 7:10:29 PM PST by MattinNJ (Allen/Pawlenty in 08-play the map.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I worked for a Navy JAG who was from NY. He wanted to vote against her first for her senate race and then for her presidental apsirations.


62 posted on 12/02/2005 7:31:11 PM PST by Little_shoe ("For Sailor MEN in Battle fair since fighting days of old have earned the right.to the blue and gold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MattinNJ

Yeah, I was gonna say it may be no picnic for us, either. We're even more in the dark about whom will likely get the GOP nod than the 'Rats are. If McCain is serious, we're going to have a major league turd in in our punch bowl.


63 posted on 12/02/2005 7:31:57 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
"....just 25% of Americans say they would definitely vote for her.

'Course, her husband was elected the first time with only about 16% of the registered voters voting for him.

64 posted on 12/02/2005 7:39:39 PM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
Intriguing thought. What would they be called? Gangsters?
65 posted on 12/02/2005 7:39:42 PM PST by msnimje (Everyday there is a new example of the Democrats "Culture of Dementia")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

LOL....maybe if Sharpton was in the party, it would be called that "Gangsta" Party.

But, they might not get "Fifty Cent"'s vote...I hear he is a hugh George Bush fan...lol


66 posted on 12/02/2005 7:53:15 PM PST by Txsleuth (9/11NEVER FORGET-NEVER SURRENDER, Sam Johnson, a REAL hero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: MsGooch
Ping. Maybe I'll be buying lunch after all :-)
67 posted on 12/02/2005 8:22:33 PM PST by upchuck (Mark Steyn: "...Democratic Party are a bunch of losers because they're all tactics and no strategy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King

Before, I would have said Clinton was a sure thing for the nod. Now she's looking ridiculous by trying to move to the "center" on Iraq, which makes the liberals scornful of her, and doesn't draw any support from the right anyway. That said, I have no idea what she's going to do in full campaign mode. The Clintons have stepped over dozens of people and cast many of their political allies to the wind when it was convienent for them to do so. Who knows what "dirt" she could leak out on her prospective rivals.

And for those pointing out 1976 and 1992, what about 1984 and 1988, when two blue state candidates got the nod and went down to crushing defeat?


68 posted on 12/02/2005 8:26:41 PM PST by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Give it time. After a year of prep-work by the NY Times she'll have the lower half of the country's IQ curve convinced she's a cross between Mother Teresa and Joan of Arc. Trust me on that one.

Don't believe it. The lefties are, justifably, sick and tired of the triangulation nonsense. They are looking for someone with the courage of hard left liberal convictions.Hillary will NOT be nominated.

69 posted on 12/02/2005 8:36:14 PM PST by toddrundgrenisgod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

I'm still not buying it. I don't think she can find anyone to run like Perot did to spoil the rightwing vote. She's running an extraordinarily risky pre-campaign now, what with her flip-flopping on some issues and her attempts to move center, move right and stay left. Has anyone told her that Bush isn't running again in 08? LOL! She's not likeable by any stretch of the imagination and I don't see her even winning the dimwit primary in 08.


70 posted on 12/02/2005 8:36:59 PM PST by goresalooza (Nurses Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goresalooza
She's not likeable by any stretch of the imagination and I don't see her even winning the dimwit primary in 08.

I agree with that. I think the first woman president will be a Margaret Thatcher type rather than a Wicked Witch type.
71 posted on 12/02/2005 8:39:48 PM PST by msnimje (Everyday there is a new example of the Democrats "Culture of Dementia")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: toddrundgrenisgod

The Slimes prints but who buys it anymore? Their national circulation has dropped drastically. Hitlery has lost her stranglehold on the media, both print and radio/TV. I agree...hitlery will be a virtual nonplayer in the dim primary. The voters will pick someone else entirely but definitely not her.


72 posted on 12/02/2005 8:40:36 PM PST by goresalooza (Nurses Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Support For Hillary Clinton Presidential Bid Falls To Lowest Level This Year

Finally some good news.

73 posted on 12/02/2005 8:41:08 PM PST by Dustbunny (Main Stream Media -- Making 'Max Headroom' a reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
Values of Dean/Kerry just jumped up tremendously.
Throw Gore together with Hillary into the mix and we have a lively pre-season with Bill Clinton firing up the troops to reenter these so familiar White House places and spaces.
74 posted on 12/02/2005 8:45:50 PM PST by hermgem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

"I think the first woman president will be a Margaret Thatcher type"

Oh, I so agree! Someone more in line with a Condi Rice...someone with intelligence, common sense and who carries a big stick. In comparison, hitlery is a lightweight with the exception of her elephantine cankles.


75 posted on 12/02/2005 8:47:23 PM PST by goresalooza (Nurses Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss

"She ain't run'in."

I have considered that too, that she won't run, in the end. I think she is currently "laying the groundwork" and hoping to get a groundswell of support but it's not happening. The clintons are done, IMO. They've been out of power and dwindling down since they were removed from the White House in 2001 by probably minutes before the Bush inaugural.


76 posted on 12/02/2005 8:52:36 PM PST by goresalooza (Nurses Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: goresalooza
History will show that BJ Clinton destroyed the Democratic party in our time.

Clinton's triangulation mumbo jumbo and John Kerry's impenetrably tortured logic have created a groundswell on the left for a standard barer with solid liberal positions.

Frankly, I can't blame them.

77 posted on 12/02/2005 9:03:57 PM PST by toddrundgrenisgod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: toddrundgrenisgod

Well said. klintune ruined them and I'm loving it! LOL


78 posted on 12/02/2005 9:30:32 PM PST by goresalooza (Nurses Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: goresalooza

I think after 2008, Bubba and Hillary will go their separate ways. He doesn't need her and never did (obviously). She's a leach and nothing more. If she hadn't married Bubba, we probably wouldn't even know of her existence. Her NY seat was a pushover. If Minnie Mouse was a Dem, she could have won NY because of NYC.


79 posted on 12/02/2005 10:10:07 PM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Her prospects are declining along with the ratings of "Commander in Chief".


80 posted on 12/02/2005 10:32:40 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson