Skip to comments.
Woodward Claim on CIA Leak Disputes Charge
AP ^
| Nov 16
| By TONI LOCY and PETE YOST
Posted on 11/16/2005 4:25:17 PM PST by notes2005
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
1
posted on
11/16/2005 4:25:19 PM PST
by
notes2005
To: notes2005
I bet MSDNC Matthews is going to cry himself to sleep tonight.
2
posted on
11/16/2005 4:25:55 PM PST
by
Rosemont
To: notes2005
Hey Woody, how long were you prepared to let Libby twist in the breeze?
To: Rosemont
Yep. The spin will be Ray's take in the article. In any event, it hurt Kneepad Yost to write this article....
4
posted on
11/16/2005 4:30:34 PM PST
by
eureka!
(Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/4 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
To: DoughtyOne
Until Woodward put two and two together and realized he was going to be called by Libby's lawyers to testify. If Fitzgerald has any brains whatsoever, which I seriously doubt, he would drop the charges against Libby right now, and close the investigation with an explaination that it was all a waste of time and the taxpayers money. If he doesn't, Libby's lawyers are going to make him look like the idiot he is!!! Fitzgerald is toast, he just doesn't know it. What a loser!!!
To: DoughtyOne
How long is Novak gonna let everyone 'twist' in the breeze?
To: JLAGRAYFOX
To: JLAGRAYFOX
Shhhhh don't say anything
To: notes2005
Wah Waaaaaaa!
9
posted on
11/16/2005 4:34:45 PM PST
by
Solamente
To: penelopesire
Did he know about plame for two years also?
To: Rosemont
"although Libby is charged with lying to a grand jury and the FBI, not with disclosing the CIA official's name."
I love how before this, the AP and Reuters would always say Libby was indicted after an investigation into the leaking of a CIA Agent's name- implying that Libby was indicted for "outing" plame. Now, they are shouting from the rooftops that Libby is indicted for perjury, not for outing. They are so transparent they will say anything, and even contradict themselves, to make a Conservative look bad.
To: JLAGRAYFOX
this is just the beginning of the unravel. fitz is way over his head. wait until this goes to trial , the under oath testimony will be incredible from all of these better than the rest msmers. the defense will ruthless. the wpost looks ridiculous.
12
posted on
11/16/2005 4:37:10 PM PST
by
fantom
To: notes2005
Bob Woodward's version of when and where he learned the identity of a CIA operative contradicts a special prosecutor's contention that Vice President Dick Cheney's top aide was the first to make the disclosure to reporters. Did Fitzgerald say this?
To: JLAGRAYFOX
Did you or anyone see that interview Brit Hume did with a former US Attorney? He said Fitz news conference was an absolute DISGRACE.
I've been looking for the transcript of that interview...appears not to be available yet.
He says pretty much the same thing you've just said...he should drop all charges against Libby sooner than later...or he'll really end up in the poopoo pile.
14
posted on
11/16/2005 4:38:40 PM PST
by
shield
(The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
To: notes2005
Notice another MSM whore coming OUT after the INDICTMENTS are made.
15
posted on
11/16/2005 4:40:34 PM PST
by
funkywbr
To: notes2005
This is a real dilema for Washington insiders and RAT operatives. Who do you believe, the special prosecutor who may be trying to ingratiate himself with the beltway power players or, Bob Woodward, the man who has already ingratiated himself with the same people?
Their game plan will probably be to just ignore the statement in public and chastise him in private at the coming holiday cocktail parties.
16
posted on
11/16/2005 4:42:00 PM PST
by
capydick
("A good conscience is a continual Christmas")
To: DoughtyOne
Not sure. ???? This stuff is going to lead right back into the DNC and Joe Wilson himself. Wait and see.
To: Right_in_Virginia
Yep. In his presser at the time of the indictment. Hence, methinks he is going to be p*ssed by being gamed by the presstitutes....
18
posted on
11/16/2005 4:44:38 PM PST
by
eureka!
(Hey Lefties: Only 3 and 1/4 more years of W. Hehehehe....)
To: notes2005
Woodward????? That creep still around?????
I bet Bill Casey told him about Plane during one of their deathbed conversations!
19
posted on
11/16/2005 4:44:59 PM PST
by
Sociopathocracy
(The Left and Islamo-fascism, the twin cancers of human history.)
To: notes2005
Everyone is speculating if Rove, Sheeny or some one else in the White House leaked to Woodward. Think about it Bush had everyone working in the White House sign a waiver of any confidentiality. Woodward is saying that the name of his source is confidential.
One must assume that Woodward's source is not in the White House.
My guess is the State Department.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-163 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson