Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MAN ON DOG? (Lawmakers move to lower penalty for bestiality … seriously)
The Weekly DIG ^ | 11/14/2005 | PAUL MCMORROW

Posted on 11/14/2005 9:49:08 AM PST by Rutles4Ever

More than two and a half years ago, the nation laughed as pro-family crusader Rick Santorum predicted the consequences of legalized gay marriage: If man-on-man marriage was sanctified, man-on-child and man-on-dog unions might not be far behind.

Those who jeered Santorum were silenced last Tuesday. Man-on-dog isn’t legal just yet, but if the Massachusetts State Legislature has its way, it might be soon. On November 1, cheerleading for bestiality was just one of a string of stunning pieces of legislation that converged on the legislature’s judiciary committee in a bizarre, post-Halloween orgy. The imminent collapse of the state cannot be far behind.

Sponsored by Senators Cynthia Creem and Robert O’Leary, and Representatives Michael Festa and David Linsky, the bestiality measure was buried in a packaged assault on morality, disguised as “An Act Relative to Archaic Crimes.” The bill would strike down several sections of the current penal code criminalizing adultery, fornication and the advertisement of abortion. It also repeals what appears to be a sodomy statute forbidding “abominable and detestable crime against nature, either with mankind or with a beast.”

Archaic, indeed.

The new law would continue to forbid “a sexual act on an animal,” but reduce possible penalties for committing such a crime, making it decidedly less illegal. Whereas the old law punished doggie-diddling and the like with hard time (a maximum sentence of 20 years) in state prison, the new measure would give activist judges the option of slapping perps with a mere two and a half years in plush local jails, or even letting zoophiliacs walk with a $5,000 fine.

How badly has Massachusetts’ moral compass suffered since dudes started honeymooning with dudes? Not one legislator, nor a single member of the God-fearing public, appeared before the judiciary committee to denounce the proposed changes. But then again, who has time to worry about bestiality when teenagers are shoplifting and buying NyQuil?

Though presumably more than willing to lower penalties for crimes against nature, Rep. Linsky demanded the judiciary committee get tough on the real criminals—mall thieves. It turns out that if shopping bags are lined with duct tape, any merchandise inside can be snuck past security tag sensors undetected. One shoplifting ring, Linsky testified, had recently been busted in Natick with $47,000 in stolen goods. Linsky’s bill would criminalize the possession of duct-tape bags and other shoplifting tools in malls, punishing offenders with up to two years in the clink and a $1,000 fine.

Cold medicine, it appears, is also a greater threat to society than bestiality, as Falmouth Rep. Matthew Patrick denounced NyQuil and codeine, but remained silent about barnyard romance. Patrick’s bill would criminalize the sale of “cough syrup or a cold remedy containing alcohol or codeine … to any person under the age of 18.” Such medicine “wreaks a lot of havoc on young people,” Patrick argued.

And the shoplifting and NyQuil bills were two of the tamer legislative initiatives before the committee; the rest of the docket amounted to a clearinghouse of insanity.

Up for consideration was a measure, sponsored by Southie’s Jack Hart, to ban the advertisement of fireworks; a bill banning the sale of laser pointers to minors; a push to revamp the way the state punishes graveyard vandals; an examination of how to combat the epidemic of drunken riots; new punishments for drivers who steal gas; and—our personal favorite—a bid to make criminally liable anyone who knowingly allows their telephone to be used “repeatedly, for the sole purpose of harassing, annoying or molesting [another] person … or for the purpose of repeatedly using indecent or obscene language to that person or his family.”

Hopefully, with those problems solved, we’ll all be able to marry our dogs and live in peace.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: bestiality; homosexualagenda; romneylandishell; sin; thegaystate; thegutter; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-210 next last
To: Darksheare

I read it. I don't get it. What's your point?


41 posted on 11/14/2005 10:08:19 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Well, swap out 'dog' with 'child' or 'sister' and ask the same question.

You think your sister is a dog, too, eh?  Okay, but don't equate your child to one around your wife.
42 posted on 11/14/2005 10:08:27 AM PST by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
"Help"


43 posted on 11/14/2005 10:08:51 AM PST by Dallas59 (“You love life, while we love death.” - Al-Qaeda / Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

State Senator Cynthia Creem? God, if I had a name like that, I'd change it right quick.

Reminds me, though, "Jersey" Joe Walcott's real name was Arnold Cream. Really.

The MA legislature is a strange place. It's real name is "Sam's Ant Farm." Really.

John Adams isn't rolloing over in his grave - he's doing jack-knifes. Ugh.


44 posted on 11/14/2005 10:09:40 AM PST by RexBeach ("The rest of the world is three drinks behind." -Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever; Owl_Eagle; Sam's Army; Lazamataz; Darksheare; pissant; Dashing Dasher; najida; ...
The bill would strike down several sections of the current penal code criminalizing adultery, fornication and the advertisement of abortion. It also repeals what appears to be a sodomy statute forbidding “abominable and detestable crime against nature, either with mankind or with a beast.”

Way to go Massachusetts, now you can actually love your dog too much!!! PING!!!

45 posted on 11/14/2005 10:11:22 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (People too weak to follow their own dreams, will always find a way to discourage yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

See, I told you.  Lots of fellers like laying with beasts of the field.  I'm not weird.  You owe me an apology.

Owl_Eagle

(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,

 it was probably sarcasm)

46 posted on 11/14/2005 10:11:45 AM PST by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick

goes in the YOU'VE GOT TO BE KIDDING category.


47 posted on 11/14/2005 10:12:33 AM PST by peacebaby (I'm not overwhelmed! I'm just the right amount of whelmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: peacebaby
"The new law would continue to forbid “a sexual act on an animal,” but reduce possible penalties for committing such a crime, making it decidedly less illegal. Whereas the old law punished doggie-diddling and the like with hard time (a maximum sentence of 20 years) in state prison, the new measure would give activist judges the option of slapping perps with a mere two and a half years in plush local jails, or even letting zoophiliacs walk with a $5,000 fine."

Massachusetts is going to Hell in the fast lane.

48 posted on 11/14/2005 10:14:18 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (People too weak to follow their own dreams, will always find a way to discourage yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
Playing "move over rover" again.

What are we to do with you?

49 posted on 11/14/2005 10:15:27 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (People too weak to follow their own dreams, will always find a way to discourage yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick
Way to go Massachusetts, now you can actually love your dog too much!!! PING!!!

Note to self. Buy stock in companies that make peanut butter.

50 posted on 11/14/2005 10:16:27 AM PST by NeoCaveman (ANWR is national security, RINO's keep us dependent on foreign oil, aiding our enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: dubyaismypresident
Oh, that is just wrong!!!

funny, but wrong.

52 posted on 11/14/2005 10:18:35 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (People too weak to follow their own dreams, will always find a way to discourage yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick
funny, but wrong.

That's me.

53 posted on 11/14/2005 10:19:13 AM PST by NeoCaveman (ANWR is national security, RINO's keep us dependent on foreign oil, aiding our enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Um, it's not happening. Regardless of what this hysterical author wants us to think, bestiality has not been legalized. MA has cleaned up the language of it's statutes, and apparently given judges more leeway in sentencing animal abusers, but that's hardly a fullfillment of Santorum's prophecy. I'd be willing to bet that the law this author is talking about is one of those archaic bits of code that isn't even used anymore - there's probably something else that addresses animal abuse...


54 posted on 11/14/2005 10:19:18 AM PST by A. Goodwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach

>> State Senator Cynthia Creem? God, if I had a name like that, I'd change it right quick. <<

She did. Her given name was Anita.

"You changed your name TO Madame Latrine?"
"Well, it's better than my old name."
"What, pray tell, was your old name?"
"Mamdame Sh!+house."

-- Robin Hood: Men in Tights (paraphrased from memory.)


55 posted on 11/14/2005 10:22:03 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle

My point is, the Massachusetts Legislature has disenfranchised my gay, cross-specied dog with this proposal. It's as if she doesn't count at all.


56 posted on 11/14/2005 10:23:19 AM PST by Rutles4Ever ("Fizellas! Looks like you guys are up to no good. Well, THIS gang used to be like that TOO, 3, 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

the worst thing is that dog did pretty well for himself.


57 posted on 11/14/2005 10:23:23 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: A. Goodwin

It is severely loosing the penalty though.


58 posted on 11/14/2005 10:23:30 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (People too weak to follow their own dreams, will always find a way to discourage yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick
loosing = loosening.

Damn fingers

59 posted on 11/14/2005 10:24:53 AM PST by Jersey Republican Biker Chick (People too weak to follow their own dreams, will always find a way to discourage yours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

What else could you expect from Massachusetts?


60 posted on 11/14/2005 10:25:44 AM PST by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-210 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson