Posted on 11/07/2005 6:32:13 AM PST by advance_copy
LOL. Clever and funny! You took me out of context. Obviously my reference was to the movie.
I had Washington and the points. So I was a little nervous there at the end inside the 5. I am 10 for 13 against the spread this week so far and have the Colts and points over NE. It was a good weekend.
Nay! It's just their way of helping Corzine(?) and Kaine...those two jerks are goin down on Tues., so NBC=Nothing But Communist, are doing their best to help out the sinking rats!!
LOL!I am a big fan of electing House members President,I think that is the only way we get a conservative.LOL!
"Who cares? Did anybody even watch the thing?"
MY sentiments exactly.
Who gives a flying $h!t?
He's a tax cutter, but not a supply-sider, apparently, since he didn't talk about the supply side benefits of tax cuts. Santos' 2% paperwork cost for Medicare argument for expanding it to accept everyone was probably a point that lots of viewers found interesting, and alluring.
They're both Dimocrat Fantasy Porno.
Does anyone know if Peggy Noonan still a consultant to the show?
The winners are those whose goal is to subtly weave the UN agenda into mainstream consciousness.
Pray for W and Our Troops
West Wing had a "leak episode" a couple of weeks back. Toby (I think) was "frog marched" out of the White House.
I watched because I was polled by the Zogby organization prior to the show about my feelings on the show and its two characters. It was clear to me that the poll was a 'focus group' to help design the parameters for the show.
Then as I watched the credits, I found this 'live' show was actually scripted. By whom? Lawrence O'Donnell, the ultra-lib screamer. The show may have been 'live' but the script was DOA as far as I was concerned.
The problem is that some folks may have been fooled by the fiction that 'live' meant that the participants were in a real debate.
No surprise that the 'sound bite' lines and applause lines were pro-Santos (liberal) and Vinick (conservative)had a few that made him look weird.
The debate ? Who cares.
Alan Alda is a puss. Between him and mister rodgers I didn't get layed for decades.
Well, *I* don't know..but that should be
attributed to the fact that i've never
watched more than 10 minutes of the show
in one sitting...
I was channel surfing and saw Smit and Alda in a "Live" debate. I had no idea what it was about. I watched for 5 minutes. The issue was illegal immigration.
The Alan Alda "GOP" solution was simply to build a wall (no discussion of holding employers accountable). Then the Smits Dem position was allowed to rant and rave about how this is a poverty problem while the "GOP" side just blubbered.
It was idiotic.
Of course other fine (sarc) viewing choices included Category 7 and The Revisionist Crusades on the History channel.
So I went to bed early. I won.
Actually she is supposedly an Independent. Women would make weak Presidents in my opinion. Guess I am not a feminist.
I watched the segment about African tax rates. Ihave to admit, it was a pretty interesting point, but have no idea whether it was based on fact. After that, off it went.
Any mention of second amendment issues?
I thought Alda made excellent points to lowering taxes when he cited the reason for third world countries and why they were poor.
Show was scripted. The shows producers said it was earlier.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.