Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DFU SONG: Mrs. Brown You've Got a Lovely Daughter (Janice Rogers Brown, your back is covered)
DFU SONGS | 10-2005 | Lyrics, Doug from Upland

Posted on 10/27/2005 7:02:05 AM PDT by doug from upland

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3105/808/1600/janice%20rogers%20brown.jpg

MIDI - MRS. BROWN YOU'VE GOT A LOVELY DAUGHTER

Janice Rogers Brown, your back is covered
Judges wise as you are something rare
We've been waiting...we won't wait anymore
We'll stand behind George Bush and smack RATS to the floor

Janice Rogers Brown, your back is covered
We are more than ready for the fight
We've been waiting...we won't wait anymore
We'll stand behind George Bush and smack RATS to the floor

Our culture war, we are set to win
We'll all lock and load and let the games begin

Janice Rogers Brown, your back is covered
Chuckie Schmuckie Schumer will be toast
We've been waiting...we won't wait anymore
We'll stand behind George Bush and smack RATS to the floor

Janice Rogers Brown, your back is covered
Janice Rogers Brown, your back is covered
Janice Rogers Brown, your back is covered
Janice Rogers Brown, your back is covered


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: chuckie; culturewar; drivetheratsnuts; janicerogersbrown; jrb; realconservative; schumer; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 10/27/2005 7:02:08 AM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Pray with me.


2 posted on 10/27/2005 7:07:11 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (If you don't like Jesus, you can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Are you listening, Dubya?
3 posted on 10/27/2005 7:07:57 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The Constitutional option. We are ready.


4 posted on 10/27/2005 7:09:44 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: All
JANICE ROGERS BROWN

Justice Brown Has Significant Judicial Experience. "Since May 2, 1996, Janice Brown has been an Associate Justice of the California Supreme Court. From November 4, 1994, she was an Associate Justice of the Third District Court of Appeal in Sacramento." (California Courts Website, www.courtinfo.ca.gov, Accessed 4/19/05)

Prior To Her Service On The Bench, Brown Was A Legal Advisor To Governor Pete Wilson. "From January 7, 1991, to November 1994, Ms. Brown served as Legal Affairs Secretary to Governor Pete Wilson. The job included diverse duties, ranging from analysis of administration policy, court decisions, and pending legislation to advice on clemency and extradition questions. The Legal Affairs Office monitored all significant state litigation and had general responsibility for supervising departmental counsel and acting as legal liaison between the Governor's office and executive departments." (California Courts Website, www.courtinfo.ca.gov, Accessed 4/19/05)

Before Her Work In The Governor's Office, Brown Accumulated Extensive Work Experience, Both In The Public And In The Private Sector. "Prior to joining Governor Wilson's senior staff, Brown was an associate at Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller & Naylor, a government and political law firm. Before joining the firm in January 1990, Brown served for two and a half years as Deputy Secretary and General Counsel for the state's Business, Transportation and Housing Agency, working primarily with business regulatory departments. Brown came to BT&H after eight years (1979-1987) in the Attorney General's Office, where she worked in both the criminal and civil divisions." (California Courts Website, www.courtinfo.ca.gov, Accessed 4/19/05)

"From 1977 To 1979, Brown Worked For The Legislative Counsel." (California Courts Website, www.courtinfo.ca.gov, Accessed 4/19/05)

Janice Rogers Brown's Is A "Horatio Alger Story." "If there is a female equivalent to an Horatio Alger story, then California Supreme Court Justice Janice Rogers Brown's journey from being the daughter of an Alabama sharecropper to serving on the Golden State's high court fits the bill." (Gwen Daye Richardson, Op-Ed, "California Supreme Court Justice Janice Rogers Brown," Headway/ Ethnic News Watch, 8/31/98)

Janice Rogers Brown Is "A California Supreme Court Justice, The Daughter Of A Sharecropper, An African-American And A Conservative." (Kathy Kiely, "Senate On Brink Of 'Nuclear' Filibuster War," USA Today, 4/15/05)

"As A Pioneer In Her Field, Brown Holds An Optimistic, Though Balanced, View Of Our Nation." "As a pioneer in her field, Brown holds an optimistic, though balanced, view of our nation. 'Our country has unique problems,' she says. 'We don't do things perfectly, sometimes we don't even do them well. But we are at least trying to accommodate political equality. Our peculiar history of slavery forces us to deal with issues of inequality. However poorly we may have done it, we have been able to maintain a stable democracy, and that is the great legacy of America.'" (Gwen Daye Richardson, Op-Ed, "California Supreme Court Justice Janice Rogers Brown," Headway/ Ethnic News Watch, 8/31/98)

Janice Rogers Brown Was One Of Four California Supreme Court Justices On Ballot In November 1998. She received ringing endorsements:

Justice Janice Rogers Brown Won 75.91% Approval In 1998 vote, Higher Than Other Three Justices Facing Reelection:

Justice: For: Against:
Janice Rogers Brown 75.91% 24.09%
Ronald M. George 75.49% 24.51%
Stanley Mosk 70.51% 29.49%
Ming William Chin 69.26% 30.74%

(California Secretary Of State Website, http://vote98.ss.ca.gov/Final/sov/SOV49-51.pdf, Accessed 4/19/05)

California Papers Believe Bush's Nomination Of Rogers Brown Should Be Considered:

San Francisco Chronicle Said Rogers Brown Was "Thoughtful" And Deserved A "Careful But Evenhanded" Nomination Review. "In her time on the California Supreme Court, [Justice Janice Rogers] Brown, 54, has proved to be thoughtful and a prolific writer of opinions. She supports limits on abortion rights, corporate liability and the death penalty and opposes gun control and affirmative action. Š Senators should give her nomination a careful but evenhanded review." (Editorial, "Mirrored On The Bench," The San Francisco Chronicle, 8/1/03)

The Orange County Register Compared Rogers Brown's Views On Limited Government "Refreshing," And Compared Her Views To The Founding Fathers':


6 posted on 10/27/2005 7:17:05 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

The entire administration is under seige. The time is right to choose Brown and get the active conservatives standing solidly behind him. We will take the fight to the RATS --- but he has to do it, not wimp out!


7 posted on 10/27/2005 7:19:09 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
The entire administration is under seige. The time is right to choose Brown and get the active conservatives standing solidly behind him. We will take the fight to the RATS --- but he has to do it, not wimp out!

MEGA-DITTOES

8 posted on 10/27/2005 7:23:23 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte (Meadows Place, TX-"Tom DeLay Country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: doug from upland

Brown , you want Brown, they just ate a woman appart who has done nothing wrong ! What do you think they would do to Brown? What is this the two for one sale, you want an all out war? Maybe, I am not as smart as you snobs , but what I want is just a good Supreme court. Brown and the far ,far would be nominations from hell . If you want a civial war in this country you go fight it ,not me. All I want is a good court . There is the reason I supported Bush.


11 posted on 10/27/2005 7:46:04 AM PDT by betsyross1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland


Janice, Janice, Janice!

An attractive conservative woman who happens to be Black on the bench will drive Dems NUTS!
12 posted on 10/27/2005 7:50:45 AM PDT by Antoninus (The greatest gifts parents can give their children are siblings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: betsyross1776
Brown , you want Brown, they just ate a woman appart who has done nothing wrong ! What do you think they would do to Brown? What is this the two for one sale, you want an all out war? Maybe, I am not as smart as you snobs , but what I want is just a good Supreme court. Brown and the far ,far would be nominations from hell . If you want a civial war in this country you go fight it ,not me. All I want is a good court . There is the reason I supported Bush.
=================================================================================

Very entertaining post. I am pleased to respond.

1. Brown has done nothing wrong
2. The people who "ate a woman appart" (whatever that means) were conservatives; our side would obviously not do that to Brown
3. Two for one sale is just a silly analogy
4. Yes, the time is right for all out war....we are ready
5. Snobs? That is not nice.
6. She would make it a good Supreme court where we have a solid, not a wavering, 5-4 advantage
7. "Brown and the far ,far" (whatever that means) is not a nomination from hell; she has already been confirmed once. If they say she is not qualified, why in the world would they vote for her for the DC circuit? Did they vote for someone unqualified?
8. Wake up! We are already in a civil war. This one is a culture war and is just as important as the other one. Where have you been?
9. I also want a good court. Ideally, Ginzberg and Souter would not be on one.
10. I supported Bush for two main reasons -- his unwavering leadership in the War on Terror, and his promise to give us a solid conservative court with justices like Scalia and Thomas.

Other than my corrections, that was a cogent and brilliant argument. By the way, welcome to FR.

13 posted on 10/27/2005 8:02:23 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
re: "him"

I was referring back to the previous sentence and meant to refer back to the president. Point taken. It would have been better stated ---

President Bush and the entire administration are under seige. The time is right to choose Brown and get the active conservatives standing solidly behind him.

14 posted on 10/27/2005 8:06:29 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
We'll stand behind George Bush and smack RATS to the floor

Inutile some uber-con decides he doesn't like the President because he was fired.

What makes anyone think that Brown wants any part of the process?

15 posted on 10/27/2005 8:10:46 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
What makes anyone think that Brown wants any part of the process?
======================================

Ummmmm, she accepted a DC appointment and just went through confirmation?

16 posted on 10/27/2005 8:12:37 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
Okay, what is a "mesocon?" Did I miss the talking points email yesterday?

I think the winning ticket would be Allen/Rice. She has said she does not want to run for Prez. But, if she were nominated as VP at the convention, it would be a much shorter campaign for her, she could concentrate on Secretary of State for almost her entire tenure, and she wouldn't have to be out raising money for two years.

17 posted on 10/27/2005 8:15:35 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I posted this on Oct. 4 about Meiers withdrawing and Brown being the real choice all along -

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1496707/posts?page=24#24

BUT I did hear Rush say awhile back that he ran into Brown recently and she said her confirmation was so rough she would not want to go through it again.

18 posted on 10/27/2005 8:28:58 AM PDT by MomwithHope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MomwithHope

I have wondered that all along. Miers would have had to volunteer to get beaten up. I can't see Dubya asking her to go through it. Oh, no! IT WAS ROVE, IT WAS ROVE! :)


19 posted on 10/27/2005 8:33:35 AM PDT by doug from upland (David Kendall -- protecting the Clintons one lie at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Okay, what is a "mesocon?"

Half way between Paleocons and Neocons. "paleo"=old, "neo"=new and "meso"=middle.

20 posted on 10/27/2005 8:52:19 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson