Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sources: No Indictments Wednesday in CIA Leak Probe
Fox News ^ | October 26, 2005 | Jane Roh

Posted on 10/26/2005 9:36:57 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative

A special prosecutor who has spent nearly two years investigating the leak of a CIA agent's identity is not expected to announce his long-awaited conclusions on Wednesday.

Sources told FOX News that no indictments or other legal action were expected just yet by the federal grand jury investigating the leak.

Patrick Fitzgerald, the U.S. attorney in Chicago, was making his final presentation to the 18-member grand jury on Wednesday. The jury's term expires on Friday.

Meanwhile, the White House was attempting to go about its normal business, albeit under a very dark cloud: two top aides, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby and Karl Rove, are at the center of the probe, and on Tuesday lawyers involved in the case revealed Vice President Dick Cheney may have tipped off Libby, his chief of staff, to the agent's identity.

Fitzgerald and the grand jury convened at the U.S. District Courthouse at 9 a.m. EDT, just two days before the jury's term is set to expire. Until then, when they decide to announce their findings is entirely at their discretion. Fitzgerald also has the option to extend the grand jury's term.

On Tuesday, investigators interviewed neighbors of the woman at the heart of the case, Valerie Plame. Marc Lefkowitz, who lives across the street from Plame, was interviewed by two FBI agents who arrived at his house without notice, his wife told FOX News. Lefkowitz was asked if he knew that Plame worked for the CIA before her name appeared in a July 14, 2003, column by Robert Novak.

Lefkowitz's wife told FOX News that she and her husband believed Plame was "some kind of consultant," and did not know she worked for the CIA.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cialeak; doabloodysearch; fitzgerald; grandjury; plame; rove
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

1 posted on 10/26/2005 9:36:58 AM PDT by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Th news is There is no news?..........This is news?............


2 posted on 10/26/2005 9:38:16 AM PDT by Red Badger (I've eaten so much crow in my life that I'm immune to bird flu.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

FoX NeWs ticker on FNC

Grand jury appears to have broken for lunch or possibly for the day..


3 posted on 10/26/2005 9:39:08 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Monthly Donor spoken Here. Go to ... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
The "gurus" like Judge Napolitano on Fox said that if they were coming, indictments would have to come by today, or, absolutely the latest, tomorrow, to allow some "Ronnie Earle" time in case something was screwed up before Friday.

I think this is over.

4 posted on 10/26/2005 9:40:00 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

...or possibly forever.


5 posted on 10/26/2005 9:40:07 AM PDT by Rokurota (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Grand jury appears to have broken for lunch or possibly for the day..

breaking for a ham sandwich perhaps?
6 posted on 10/26/2005 9:40:27 AM PDT by Kokojmudd (Trade the US Senate for the Iraqi Parliament!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kokojmudd

Looks to me like they're vegetarian.


7 posted on 10/26/2005 9:41:18 AM PDT by Rokurota (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
I wish this thing would break one way or another, it seems it's got half the government paralyzed.
8 posted on 10/26/2005 9:43:12 AM PDT by Fido969 ("And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free" (John 8:32).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

It's the jury, not the prosecutor, that indicts? Right?

Although the routine is that the jury does whatever the prosecutor asks, that might not happen in this case.


9 posted on 10/26/2005 9:46:09 AM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

cold water-orgasm ending-buzz kill for the left wing(nut) media, eh?


10 posted on 10/26/2005 9:46:55 AM PDT by xcamel (No more RINOS - Not Now, Not Ever Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

Just curious.

If Tenet told Cheney and Cheney told Libby, Why aren't they going after Tenet?


11 posted on 10/26/2005 9:47:08 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LS
LOL...Yes I heard the judge say this the other day on FoxNews. However, maybe Fritz's is so good, he'll not need the GJ 'cause the indictments will be in perfect order?

I hope you're right...this is over.

12 posted on 10/26/2005 9:47:30 AM PDT by shield (The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LS

I would like to be as optimistic. I do find it interesting, however, that there are reports of last-minute interviewing of Plame's neighbors. I heard her old CIA boss interviewed some time ago and he said her CIA association was well known by some of her neighbors and that in turn was known by the CIA. He thought this was a political witch hunt and nothing more.


13 posted on 10/26/2005 9:47:46 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Because it is not illegal for the CIA boss to give classified info to the Veep, who is cleared to receive it?


14 posted on 10/26/2005 9:48:53 AM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

This makes absolutely no sense. You've been conducting an investigation for this long and you just now are trying to find out if people knew she was an agent. Something is really screwy about this.


15 posted on 10/26/2005 9:49:15 AM PDT by half-cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Lefkowitz was asked if he knew that Plame worked for the CIA before her name appeared in a July 14, 2003, column by Robert Novak.

Is it possible that the visits with the neighbors were staged to distract from some official letter being handed to Val or Joe Wilson at their home?

16 posted on 10/26/2005 9:49:39 AM PDT by syriacus (Bush hasn't done a bad job, all things (WOT, vagaries of Nature, Lib lies + obstruction) considered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
I think this is over.

Aaaw dang it. Don't pop the fantasies in the idiot press yet. I want to see all the subpoenas that would get issued to the lying lefties and watch them squirm.

17 posted on 10/26/2005 9:50:00 AM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

They all have clearance. They would have to have had proveable malevolent intent to indict them on the discussions you mention. It's their discussing it outside of this group, which I do not think has been proven, that would cause the problem. To all appearances, that is now a moot question anyway. The indictments would be regarding Libby's and Rove's testimony to the GJ. Did they forget to tell about every conversation they've had in years that may have had something to do with Plame? It's down to being a witch hunt.


18 posted on 10/26/2005 9:52:32 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

It's not illegal to tell someone who has clearance. So Tenet could tell Cheney and Cheney could tell Libby, but Libby can't tell Miller (assuming Plame really was undercover).


19 posted on 10/26/2005 9:52:41 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: half-cajun
They weren't being interviewed for the first time. Several sources report this.

My guess is it is a push back on someone raising the "She wasn't covert - all her friends and neighbors knew" defense when negotiating with Fitz.

20 posted on 10/26/2005 9:52:52 AM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson