Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some High Court Candidates Withdrew
Reuters ^ | 10/12/05 | Steve Holland and Thomas Ferraro

Posted on 10/12/2005 4:45:44 PM PDT by Mighty_Quinn

McClellan said Rove told Dobson that "some individuals, when the list was longer, well into the double digits, had said that they preferred not to be considered" because they did not want to deal with "the ordeal of going through the confirmation process."

But he said that had nothing to do with Bush's eventual nomination of Miers. "The president made a decision to nominate Harriet Miers. That was his choice, his only choice," he said.

McClellan would give no names of candidates who withdrew but a conservative federal appeals court judge, Priscilla Owen of Texas, was reportedly one of them.

Democrats had blocked Bush's nomination of Owen to the appellate court during his first term and warned she would have trouble getting confirmed for the Supreme Court.

Bush says Miers shares his conservative judicial philosophy but so far there has been little paperwork to document her views on abortion and other divisive legal issues.

(Excerpt) Read more at olympics.reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dobson; harrietmiers; judicialnominees; nominee; priscillaowen; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
I don't know if we really wanted Owen. Some might say her views on abortion aren't clear enough.

What say all of you?

1 posted on 10/12/2005 4:45:48 PM PDT by Mighty_Quinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mighty_Quinn

I say the headline is deceptive because McClellan gave no names and their are conflicting rumors about Owens. I also say this makes the Miers pick look even more pathetic.


2 posted on 10/12/2005 4:48:13 PM PDT by Huck (Miers Miers Miers Miers Miers--I'm mired in Miers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mighty_Quinn

I agree, Quinn. She is too much of a blank slate for me, but preferable to Miers.


3 posted on 10/12/2005 4:48:59 PM PDT by Texas Federalist (qualified to serve on the United States Supreme Court)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mighty_Quinn

I don't seek an activist judge, so their opinion on abortion isn't important.

I want an originalist interpretation of the USC. A person can be pro abortion or pro life: it shouldn't impact their decision on the Roe or Casey decisions.

As I have said many times on FR, overturning Roe won't stop one abortion in the USA. That would just leave the practice to the states to regulate more freely, and not one state will outlaw first trimester abortion.


4 posted on 10/12/2005 4:49:07 PM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mighty_Quinn
I say I want to know if Harriet Miers will look to foreign laws as a basis of rulings. I want to know her feelings on the international court and I am concerned about how she is likely to rule regarding eminent domain.

Owen isn't the nominee and isn't worthy of discussion based on that alone.
5 posted on 10/12/2005 4:49:37 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mighty_Quinn
But he said that had nothing to do with Bush's eventual nomination of Miers. "The president made a decision to nominate Harriet Miers. That was his choice, his only choice," he said.
6 posted on 10/12/2005 4:49:53 PM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mighty_Quinn

hhmmmm,,,rueters hinting owen declined, or national review stating she didn't?

Gee,which to believe - reuters or national review?


7 posted on 10/12/2005 4:49:58 PM PDT by flashbunny (Sorry, but I'm allergic to KoolAid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mighty_Quinn

P.S. your headline should be changed, or at least have questions marks added - you are stating it like it's a fact when it isn't.


8 posted on 10/12/2005 4:50:37 PM PDT by flashbunny (Sorry, but I'm allergic to KoolAid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY
Nice to see a bit of realism in this venue.

Thanks.
9 posted on 10/12/2005 4:50:58 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Liberals - Stuck on Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mighty_Quinn
I say you shouldn't have posted this. Almost nobody here will read it for one thing, because they can't Bush Bash with it. I've been telling about the withdrawls on other Meiers threads, and it's as though their browsers interpret that detail of my post as invisible text.

I'm sure that once's she's withdrawn, the little whiners'll be really jubilant, and then thay can have one of Billary's numerous legal counsil instead, which will make 'em REALLY extatic.

Thanks for posting, BTW. Nobody's posting much in the way of updating news lately. It gets in the way of the Bush Bashing.

10 posted on 10/12/2005 4:52:00 PM PDT by cake_crumb (They're Not Conservative Enough! Get a Rope so We Can Hang Ourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Federalist

Owen was the Texas Supreme Ct. Justice that voted to uphold Rexas' parental notification act. This was the act that Alberto voted to overturn. What makes you say that she's a bit of a blank slate?


11 posted on 10/12/2005 4:52:03 PM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mighty_Quinn

As with a colonoscopy, once you have been through the prep you do not want to repeat same. "Confirmation hearings? No thanks."


12 posted on 10/12/2005 4:52:06 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Freedom of speech makes it much easier to spot the idiots." [Jay Lessig, 2/7/2005])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY
I don't seek an activist judge, so their opinion on abortion isn't important.

Well, there you go. Who ever would have thought I would be agreeing with a Hitman :)

13 posted on 10/12/2005 4:52:15 PM PDT by Bahbah ( Water Buckets UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mighty_Quinn
MIERS & LAST-MINUTE DROP-OUTS (Priscilla Owen did not withdraw her name)

MIERS & LAST-MINUTE DROP-OUTS [Kathryn Jean Lopez] A journalist friend just spoke with a top Texas lawyer who spoke with Priscilla Owen last week. He says that she "most emphatically" did not withdraw her name from consideration to the Court. If the White House spin is that Harriet Miers got the job because nobody else wanted it, it would seem that the White House is at a desperation point. Posted at 12:07 PM
14 posted on 10/12/2005 4:52:23 PM PDT by flashbunny (Sorry, but I'm allergic to KoolAid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

"some individuals, when the list was longer, well into the double digits"

That's not how Dobson made it sound.

So Miers was one of eight? Nine?


15 posted on 10/12/2005 4:53:15 PM PDT by Shermy (Consigliere Miers, please report back to the lottery office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mighty_Quinn

There was a post earlier today that Pricilla Owens said she did not withdraw her name from contention.


Apparently, the spin cycle is in full operation on this nomination process.


16 posted on 10/12/2005 4:53:31 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

For what it's worth, it isn't so bad. I agree with myself all the time, and look how great I turned out! :-)


17 posted on 10/12/2005 4:54:12 PM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mighty_Quinn

250+ million people in the country, and he chose Miers?


18 posted on 10/12/2005 4:55:12 PM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mighty_Quinn
I say Karl Rove lied:

MIERS & LAST-MINUTE DROP-OUTS [Kathryn Jean Lopez] A journalist friend just spoke with a top Texas lawyer who spoke with Priscilla Owen last week. He says that she "most emphatically" did not withdraw her name from consideration to the Court. If the White House spin is that Harriet Miers got the job because nobody else wanted it, it would seem that the White House is at a desperation point. Posted at 12:07 PM

19 posted on 10/12/2005 4:56:29 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY

Okay, made me laugh.


20 posted on 10/12/2005 4:57:19 PM PDT by Bahbah ( Water Buckets UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson