Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

80% of Potential SCOTUS Nominees on W's List Decline His Offer
Fox News | 10-11-05 | freedom4me

Posted on 10/11/2005 9:08:44 PM PDT by freedom4me

During the 11:00 p.m. (CST) newsbreak, Donna Fuducia reported that Karl Rove told James Dobson that 80% of the potential SCOTUS nominees on the President's list declined his offer because of they didn't want to undergo the grueling confirmation process. Perhaps this sheds new light on the reason why W chose Miers.


TOPICS: Government; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bush43; judicialnominees; miers; nothanks; rove; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720721-740741-760761-770 next last
To: RobbyS

That post was worth reading twice. :-)


721 posted on 10/12/2005 7:42:53 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 720 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Your conversation with her is almost the exact opposite of Rush's... as per post #44.

Apparently, but I still believe she'd go through with it based on our discussion.

722 posted on 10/12/2005 7:46:07 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I noted during the confirmation hearings that one week JR Brown was the incarnation of evil in the modern world, then after the Gang of 14 Compromise she was the Distinguished Jurist from California, and how it would take no great exercise of doublethink at all for the demorats to revert to the Whore Of Babylon assessment if she got nominated for SCOTUS.


723 posted on 10/12/2005 7:47:31 AM PDT by ichabod1 (The Governments #1 Defense against Terrorism is Pretending It Wasn't Terrorism~!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow
"This report does not pass the smell test, nor the accuracy test."

Pure DIS-information.

And note how many are falling for it.

724 posted on 10/12/2005 7:51:52 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: freedom4me

The very fact that Dr. Dobson's name has been dragged in the nomination process does not bode well for Counsellor Miers.

We know that when Family Oriented organizations are consulted, the left start to scream bloody murder.

With this new information leaked out ironically, Bush's desire to avoid a protracted, bloody fight will not be realized. I expect more blood to be drawn now than with the Bork or Thomas nomination.

It does not look good for Miers that conservatives are lukewarm to her nomination and the left are now going to go apoplectic upon hearing that Dobson was consulted in the process.

In the end, she will get less vote from the Dems than Roberts did and less votes from the GOP than Roberts did. Whether she can reach the magic 51 number remains to be seen, but it isn't looking good.


725 posted on 10/12/2005 7:56:31 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

She'll get 50 or more republican votes. If they can vote for Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg they most certainly had better vote for Miers.


726 posted on 10/12/2005 8:03:02 AM PDT by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 725 | View Replies]

To: samantha

"she should take several months off and try to regain her composure and stop transferring the blame for her failed relationship on the President. It is the scum that ran off on you sweetheart,"

That is one of the most disgusting things I've ever read on this board. You should be ashamed of yourself.


727 posted on 10/12/2005 8:15:34 AM PDT by flashbunny (Sorry, but I'm allergic to KoolAid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader
What? Every politician has to go through this process, and all of those presently sitting on the Supreme Court had the courage to face potential slander and dredging up of past events.

Are you at all familiar with these hearings or just commenting from afar? First, not all of the current justices went through this process as it is conducted today. Secondly, politicians are not subject to this kind of direct, eye ball to eye ball questioning and have some control of their stages. Third, this isn't about the honor of the men and women who might be nominated, it's about the lack of honor in the process. Consider that before you make your military comparisons.

728 posted on 10/12/2005 8:22:39 AM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: Deo et Patria

Fact is that George Washington did not run a version of "American Idol" but picked people whom he knew personally. Maybe Knox was not the best possible pick for secretary of war, but he had been a damned good artiullery commander, and Washington trusted him. Yeah, there are those who think of him as a crony.


729 posted on 10/12/2005 8:29:34 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 710 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

it should not have been


730 posted on 10/12/2005 8:40:34 AM PDT by wardaddy (Save a cow......eat a vegetarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 627 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden

Bush hasn't. Just because you don't like the nominee means nothing about Bush. He made a decision without taking a poll and you don't like it. So what?

I still have not seen a single RATIONAL argument against Harriet.


731 posted on 10/12/2005 9:17:58 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: samantha
No, Laura is undergoing Chemo for breast cancer and getting over her fiance' dumping her when he found out she had cancer. She wanted a loving Husband and children, now her prospects are gone. she should take several months off and try to regain her composure and stop transferring the blame for her failed relationship on the President. It is the scum that ran off on you sweetheart, it is not your fault either. She is not the same Laura and she is losing lot of listeners because she bitches and complains about everything. I feel sorry for her on two counts, but she needs to get professional help and handle her anger better. A little anger is a good thing, she is way beyond overload.

This is despicably scurrilous. I don't know and I don't care what any of your other "positons" are on anything.

732 posted on 10/12/2005 9:34:40 AM PDT by Map Kernow ("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies]

To: Neville72
Are you REALLy calling James Dobson a liar? Surely you jest.

Surely you haven't read the whole exchange between Howlin, Daughter, JimRob, and myself (or you're being disruptive, that's also an option). Show me where I called Dobson a liar, or be prepared to hang that epithet around your own neck.

733 posted on 10/12/2005 9:40:25 AM PDT by Map Kernow ("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies]

To: samantha

What a vile, despicable thing for you to say. Have you no shame?


734 posted on 10/12/2005 9:52:23 AM PDT by Deo et Patria (Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow

Thin skinned aren't you this week? By the way that little thingy at the end of my first sentence is called a question mark.

However, you did refer to the story as "steer manure", a nice way of saying "bull s**t". Taken to its logical conclusion that implies one of two things. Either Rove lied about the potential nominees removing themselves OR Dr. Dobson lied about what was said. Hence, the question I posed to you.

You Druids need to chill out and let the nomination hearings take place, primarily because you don't have a choice in the matter. If Miers comes across as anything she's not been built up to be, I and I'm sure many others will be right there beside you.

There's no excuse however, for the shameful, slanderous and insulting language that's been directed towards Miers and the President over the last week on this website. I'd have expected it from the moonbats over at Democratic Underground but not here. Sorry to say, I was sadly mistaken.


735 posted on 10/12/2005 10:20:01 AM PDT by Neville72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 733 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

So you can speak for everyone on W's Supreme Court short list from personal knowledge of their decisions?

--
No, of course not. I just have a very high respect for my fellow conservatives and would be surprised to hear that 80% of them wouldn't jump at the chance to put our courts on the right track and do their service for their country. Also since conservatives care about merit, it would be an even higher honor for most of them to serve on the SCOTUS, regardless of the pay cut or ridicule of the loser MSM.

I don't fault them for fearing all the intense media attention and attacks though. Particularly when they attack your family members.


736 posted on 10/12/2005 10:57:24 AM PDT by BamaGirl (The Framers Rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies]

To: not2worry

Maybe for some being The Big Dog in their jurisdiction is more important than being part of the pack.
---
Good point. We all have our place where we can do good.


737 posted on 10/12/2005 10:58:38 AM PDT by BamaGirl (The Framers Rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies]

To: arjay

I don't think this is true. Based on what evidence?
---
I don't have any evidence, just my post #736. I'm not trying to smear anyone, especially Mr. Dobson, but I just think conservatives are better than that.

Frankly, shirking away from these Democrat and RINO bullies is just going to empower them even more. If 80% of our guys don't even want to put their hat in the ring then the bad guys have won already. I understand most people would not be willing to make the sacrifice to fight them, but I would.

The catch though is that I would also have to ask my family to make the same sacrifice.


738 posted on 10/12/2005 11:19:58 AM PDT by BamaGirl (The Framers Rule!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 705 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
A senator would get confirmed, and by unanimous consent. That is a guarantee. The Senate is nothing if not an ol' boys club. They'd never oppose one of their own. Harry Reid even stated that before Roberts was nominated. And apparently, we all are taking Harry Reid's advice now...

Didn't Harry Reid suggest Bush name a conservative senator when O'Connor first announced her intention to retire?

739 posted on 10/12/2005 11:22:13 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: maryz

Yes he did.
He said it would guarantee confirmation.


740 posted on 10/12/2005 11:26:20 AM PDT by counterpunch (Save the GOP - withdraw Miers now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 739 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 701-720721-740741-760761-770 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson