Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ROBERT BORK CALLS MIERS NOMINATION "A DISASTER"
Tucker Carlson ^ | October 5, 2005 | Press Release

Posted on 10/07/2005 3:50:01 PM PDT by Sam Hill

ROBERT BORK CALLS THE HARRIET MIERS NOMINATION "A DISASTER" ON TONIGHT'S "THE SITUATION WITH TUCKER CARLSON"

SECAUCUS, NJ - October 7, 2005 - Tonight on MSNBC's "The Situation with Tucker Carlson," former judge and Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork tells Tucker Carlson the Harriet Miers' nomination is "a disaster on every level," that Miers has "no experience with constitutional law whatever" and that the nomination is a "slap in the face" to conservatives.

Following is a transcript of the conversation, which will telecast tonight at 11 p.m. (ET). A full transcript of the show will be available later tonight at www.tv.msnbc.com. "The Situation with Tucker Carlson" telecasts Monday through Friday at 11 p.m. (ET).

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bork; miers; noproof; robertbork; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 941-943 next last
To: bahblahbah

is = was


21 posted on 10/07/2005 4:00:57 PM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

As much as I like Judge Bork, it is disappointing to see him make such decisive statements without allowing Miers to be subjected to hearings and questions. Shouldn't a judge have all the facts before making a decision?


22 posted on 10/07/2005 4:01:10 PM PDT by RTINSC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

LOL, so Bork want to Bork her? Wow, I wish conservatives were this hard on our enemies!


23 posted on 10/07/2005 4:01:19 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

Yet another "barking moonbat" joins the ranks of Schlafly, Steyn, Noonan, Krauthammer, Will, Frum, Norquist, Weyrich, Coulter, Levin, Bauer, Malkin, Goldberg, Kristol, Savage, Hannity, Limbaugh, Ingraham, Novak, Buchanan, the Eagle Forum, Operation Rescue, the National Review, the Cato Institute et al! How dare they question the wisdom of the Miers nomination?!


24 posted on 10/07/2005 4:01:34 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican
how many people discuss your position on abortion with associates or coworkers?

I don't. We talk about work, lunch, the weather. No one has ever said to me "how do you feel about abortion."

25 posted on 10/07/2005 4:01:43 PM PDT by Bahbah (Member of the Water Bucket Brigade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: putupjob
And all the lock step Bushies will now bash Bork along with the rest.

If you are going to use Bork as the yardstick by which all nominees are to be measured in terms of intellect, and Constitutional expertize, then all nominees are going to come up short. If you doubt me, just ask Mr. Bork.

PS: Before you rip me as being anti-Bork, please take a look at my profile.

26 posted on 10/07/2005 4:01:44 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ('That was the gift the president gave us, the gift of happiness, of being together,' Cindy Sheehan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: paulat
I guess you'd want a brain surgeon who wasn't even a doctor!!

Given what the best and the brightest lawyers have done to the Constitution of the United States in the past 65 years, I'd have to think long and hard about that one if the brain surgeons had laid waste to a number of brains in the same manner the geniuses have laid waste to the constitution.

27 posted on 10/07/2005 4:03:07 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

My thoughts exactly.


28 posted on 10/07/2005 4:04:07 PM PDT by ChocChipCookie (I don't recognize my own country anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Nah, it's just called "conservatives holding each other accountable". You may want to get used to it.


29 posted on 10/07/2005 4:04:21 PM PDT by k2blader (Hic sunt dracones..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Ironic, isn't it? A man who couldn't get himself on the Court, calling her a disaster.


30 posted on 10/07/2005 4:04:48 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
I lost all respect for Bork when he supported Ruth Bader Ginsberg for the court.

No decent person could possibly do that.

31 posted on 10/07/2005 4:04:55 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
LOL, so Bork want to Bork her? Wow, I wish conservatives were this hard on our enemies!

This is one of the main reasons BUSH could not nominate a Brown or Estrada. The Senate would have wimped out on him.

Specter balked way before the Roberts nomination even begun. With supporters like the GOP Senators why does BUSH need enemies?

32 posted on 10/07/2005 4:05:25 PM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill
I thought maybe, just maybe, Bork would keep his yap shut. Not come out in favor of an appointment he disagrees with, just keep his yap shut.

But these DC types are genetically just unable to keep themselves out of the public eye.

He was nominated for the SC by a dignified man, President Reagan. Unfairly or not, he didn't pass muster. That being said, too bad some of Ronnies's dignity didn't rub off on him.

Leni

33 posted on 10/07/2005 4:06:12 PM PDT by MinuteGal (Re: The Anti-War Sheehan-ites - They want to live in the garden but not tend the garden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog
I lost all respect for Bork when he supported Ruth Bader Ginsberg for the court.

I believe you but do you have a source for this?

34 posted on 10/07/2005 4:06:21 PM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM - Being miserable for no good reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

All boils down to that they are upset with what they don't know about her.
We'll at least the one that needs to know (BUSH), does know and is sure she will not be another Souter


35 posted on 10/07/2005 4:06:23 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

"But the other level is more worrisome, in a way: it's kind of a SLAP IN THE FACE to the conservatives who've been building up a conservative legal movement for the last 20 years."


Bobo: I agree with Bork. The nominee should have been a SLAP IN THE FACE to liberal rats.

Blessings, Bobo


36 posted on 10/07/2005 4:06:37 PM PDT by bobo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sam Hill

Thanks for posting.

I have a theory - and that is that Bush is naming a moderate (who is really conservative) knowing she will appear moderate, trying to sucker another of the supremes to retire ......

I also think that Bush takes the presidency seriously, and thinks that she may be the best for the country - maybe not the best for conservatives - but for the country.


37 posted on 10/07/2005 4:06:57 PM PDT by Mr. Rational (God gave me a brain and expects me to use it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

I'm very impressed with Borks observations. Well-thought out, well-spoken. The Bush-bots won't get it. Sick of both the left and the right.


38 posted on 10/07/2005 4:07:01 PM PDT by Clock King ("How will it end?" - Emperor; "In Fire." - Kosh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

Yarddog - you're making stuff up.


39 posted on 10/07/2005 4:07:56 PM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
I heard him say it myself on some TV interview.

Not an exact quote but close: "I don't agree with her on some issues but think she will make an excellent justice".

40 posted on 10/07/2005 4:08:26 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 941-943 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson