Posted on 10/05/2005 4:28:17 AM PDT by md2576
I'm not one to normally complain on FR about freedoms that have been lost since the 9/11 attacks.
But...
We talk about the communist country of China and how they don't have free internet access.
Last night I was reading through some threads and started doing some Jihad research and came up with one of Al-Qaeda's web site's called Jihad Media Battalion.
I typed the url www.k-j-i.tk and it said "could not be found"
So I Googled Jihad Media Battalion and came up with katiba.100free.com/default.html
When I went to this site it started to bring up there site but I was then immediately sent to the c.i.a. website which said in the url bar that my I.P. was being logged.
Now this scares me because, not only have I been censored to research against the terrorists that we are fighting, but now I am made to feel as if I am being examined as a criminal now because I was looking at that site.
So it makes me feel like the c.i.a. is wondering and perhaps investigating what my motives were for visiting the site.
Now I, like many, would normally feel grateful that the c.i.a. is ay least intelligent enough to know about the site and we would want them to do there best to find any home grown Jihadist's.
But.
I felt like my freedoms and right to privacy were smashed and that I could be a suspect by the "thought police".
Some other url's that I found through Google are below but I don't want to go research our enemy because it might incriminate me. I have not visited the below links so I have no clue what they are. I am sure they are all Al-Qaeda links.
Use at own risk.
http://www.free-hoster.cc/users/aboyosef/
http://ansarnet.bluedomino.com/
http://irhaby007.ca/
http://alirhabyoon.net/
http://www.irhab.cnchost.com/
http://jehadelkoffar.100free.com/
http://www.egysite.com/ansary/
http://www.needshab.5gigs.com/news/
http://aboyosef.100free.com/
http://freelogs.com/stats/a/aboyosef911/
http://www.jeeran.com/.../username=kji911&GBID=182515
I'm not concerned because I have nothing to hide from Big Brother.
I take comfort that this is all being done solely for the protection of US citizens.
I feel safe.
I've nothing to hide.
I love Big Brother.
Yes, I do.
/1984
Ah yes ... brings back some great memories!
These cockroaches are pretty simple-minded. Consider the possibility that it is a phony FBI reference to discourage "casual" visitors.
Hmmmmmmmm....
Try to access an al-qaeda website and you're redirected to the cia....................
Of course, there is no link..........right?
BWahahahahahahahaha!
Signed, Lazamajihad.
I'm nor casual! I'm a Jihadist! I am against low-riding pants and da bomb bling-bling. Alla Crackerbarrel! Rock the Casbah!
That was brilliant. Loved it!
How do you prove that you, Beth, aren't a "raghead" and your privileges shouldn't be revoked?
Because at all the Raghead Jihadist meetings I attend, she's never on time.
I don't think the CIA has anything to do with it and am willing to bet that the site was hacked and it has not been fixed yet. Some hackers idea to scare the real wanna-be terrorists from logging onto that site. I honestly wouldn't worry about it.
Who doesn't?
That was the thread that taught me to be wary of anyone with "patriot" in his screen name. It seems odd, but it's been a useful guide.
Pleased to hear you are still punctual. I expect nothing but the best from you, Laz. Carry on.
I knew it!
Gahan Wilson ... one of my favorite cartoonists. ;)
Special Tin Foil Alert!
If they're monitoring the Web site there is absolutely no way you would know unless they choose to tell you.
As far as due process, it's a public site on a public communications network. I don't think they need a court order or anything else to monitor what goes on there.
I'm not holding anyone up to a standard that I myself cannot pass. But you are automatically condemning a class of citizen with out any proof. Do you differentiate from Arabs, Persians, or Indians? I would hope you would demand the same exacting standards for yourself.
That doesn't appear to be evident.
And lastly, rag head is YOUR term. Not mine. I don't resort to such negative connotations.
Trotting out my church attendance or my husband's security clearance does NOT exclude me from scrutiny, which I subsequently passed. You admit you passed such scrutiny. Well, good for you.
That still doesn't exclude your earlier post.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.