Skip to comments.
Ann Coulter just took apart SCOTUS nominee on the Mike Rosen show (My report)
Ann Coulter's appearance on the Mike Rosen show, 850am KOA ^
| This morning, Mon. Oct. 4th
| Report from Mike Rosen show
Posted on 10/04/2005 10:39:32 AM PDT by ajolympian2004
Ann Coulter just took apart President Bush's SCOTUS nominee on the air during her appearance on the Mike Rosen show here in Denver on 850am KOA. She called for listeners to write their senators to oppose the nomination. Wish you could have heard it!
Ann said - "Totally unqualified", called Judge Roberts "a 'dream' candidate in light of this nomination", mentioned "cronyism" over and over. Much more that I'm trying to digest. I called the station to see if they saved the audio, but no luck on that. Mike Rosen was just about speechless as Ann went on and on about why this was a lousy choice.
I agree with Ann. Huge mistake and missed opportunity.
Ann's choice, Janice Rodgers-Brown. Not enough intestinal fortitude in the White House to go with that choice.
Can't wait for Ann's column on this nomination later this week.
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 850am; anncoulter; busheeple; coulter; dubyacandonowrong; dubyahasbecomehisdad; gutlesspubs; harrietmiers; koa; miers; mikerosen; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600, 601-620, 621-640 ... 881-888 next last
To: Mo1
THAT is not a reason to throw this pick out the window
The only reason I've heard is that she was the first woman to head the Bar association in Texas.
Frankly, that doesn't give me much information. And I remember Jimmy Carter's infamous "Trust me." We did....and we lived to regret it.
601
posted on
10/04/2005 2:41:33 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: ecurbh; HairOfTheDog
Imagine what a nightmare it would be to be married to her.
602
posted on
10/04/2005 2:41:51 PM PDT
by
TKDietz
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
I also recall NR coming out against the noxious curtailment of our Constitutionally-gauranteed freedom of speech known as McCain-Feingold Oh you mean the mccain supporter who started this whole "betrayal because of Meirs" drama queen parade that ann coulter is trying to be drum major of, bill krystal.
603
posted on
10/04/2005 2:42:15 PM PDT
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: LibWrangler
Revenge against the people who put him into office, and who have the gall to actually request that he adhere to the explicit promises he made to the American people in two consecutive presidential campaigns.
To: Pharmboy
I believe Miers has argued many cases in court. She is a litigator by profession, as I understand.
To: Itzlzha
>Never mind that she was a DEMONRAT, right? Never mind that she DONATED to the DNC 3 DAYS before the Bush-41/Dukakis election? <
All this proves is you are to young for this conversation and have not made up for the deficit by reading some history.
606
posted on
10/04/2005 2:42:24 PM PDT
by
Blessed
To: Mo1
Ann had great grades in law school, but apparently couldn't cut in in the court room. She seems to be good at telling people how to fight battles she didn't have the guts to fight.
607
posted on
10/04/2005 2:42:31 PM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(Bush to Blanco to "tighten up", so she called her plastic surgeon)
To: freedomdefender
Your point is well taken. But Owen went to Baylor...gasp!
To: LibWrangler
Surely she doesn't believe Bush is the sort of person who would propose a justice (his friend, employee, assistant) out of spite. That is what she said
Something about a pay back for not supporting Gonzales
609
posted on
10/04/2005 2:43:32 PM PDT
by
Mo1
Comment #610 Removed by Moderator
To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
"I would rather think a large percent of the base sees this for what it is. A very big slap in the face."
How so, exactly?
That is the point: No one knows. And hoping, as Cheney indicated, that 10 years from now we would know, is a bit late to take a chance. Bush is selling a pig in a poke.
611
posted on
10/04/2005 2:45:19 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: Itzlzha
Never mind that she was a DEMONRAT, right? Never mind that she DONATED to the DNC 3 DAYS before the Bush-41/Dukakis election?All that is irrelevant to today. Besides, Dukakis hasn't been seen or heard from since his tank ride:
612
posted on
10/04/2005 2:46:00 PM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
("Don't Get Stuck On Stupid!" - Lieutenant General Russell "Ragin' Cajun" Honore)
To: Motherbear
>Ann is just showing her true colors....nothing good comes out of the south. :( We're all dimwits.<
I am sure she got that from her buddy Bill Marr.He says she is writing some of his lines now.
613
posted on
10/04/2005 2:46:44 PM PDT
by
Blessed
To: Dane
Alright, if these two individuals are so beyond the pale, then how about the concerns raised by so many others?
How about Rod Dreher?
Or Mark Levin?
Or L. Brent Bozell, whose father was the chief intellectual collaborator with William F. Buckley Jr, the father of the modern conservative movement in America?
What about Ramesh Ponnuru?
What about nearly every single conservative legal scholar of distinction and/or respected conseverative commentator across the board?
To: TomGuy
And hoping, as Cheney indicated, that 10 years from now we would know, is a bit late to take a chance. Bush is selling a pig in a poke I will trust Dick Cheney over you, a proclaimed expert in such matters as "selling a pig in a poke".
615
posted on
10/04/2005 2:47:33 PM PDT
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: TomGuy
Frankly, that doesn't give me much information. And I remember Jimmy Carter's infamous "Trust me." We did....and we lived to regret it. I'm not saying Meirs should not be questioned
But I would like to learn more about her and decide whether she would be a good pick or not
What is so wrong about that??
616
posted on
10/04/2005 2:47:41 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: BigSkyFreeper
Which is, of course, completely irrelevant because Ann Coulter has not been nominated, nor has she sought the nomination, for supreme court.
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
This is no time for joking.
To: txrangerette
Revenge against whom? conservatives
619
posted on
10/04/2005 2:48:26 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: Blessed
620
posted on
10/04/2005 2:48:30 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Democrats lie because they have to.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600, 601-620, 621-640 ... 881-888 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson