Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Kristol Rips Miers Nomination: W "Flinched"
Fox News

Posted on 10/03/2005 6:31:17 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

In a just-completed interview on Fox News, Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol made no effort to sugar coat his criticism of President Bush's selection of Harriet Miers as his Supreme Court nominee.

Among Kristol's comments:

There is no way to say she is the best-qualified.

It really looks like W, faced with pressure and criticism, "flinched."

This is an insult to the well-qualified conserative women W has appointed to the federal bench.

W could have appointed Miers to a federal judgeship before but didn't do so. Could reflect his views on her qualifications up till now.

He's spoken with a number of leading conservatives already this morning and they are disappointed.

Kristol stated more than once that he was surprised by the pick and was obviously disappointed, to the point of seeming almost angry.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: harrietmiers; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-245 next last
To: TBP

Posters here will defend Bush to the last drop of kool aid.
Instead of realizing that the future of the U.S court decisions rested on a STRONG nominee.
This close friend of Bush is not the conservative we were owed.
To those who think Bush made a conservative pick in this choice better think again.


221 posted on 10/03/2005 9:53:43 AM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TBP

"This is what happens when you vote Republican to try to change the courts -- you get Roberts and Miers, not the kind of strict constructionist justices we need."
__________________________________________________________

The republicians including Bush still don't seem to understand that they control all three branches of Government.


222 posted on 10/03/2005 9:57:52 AM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
It's time to demand Bush withdraw this nomination and appoint a known originalist to the courts. Where is Laura Ingram and others leading the charge to melt the phone lines down in Washington?
223 posted on 10/03/2005 10:42:32 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

I agree. Luttig for the SCOTUS!


224 posted on 10/03/2005 11:17:10 AM PDT by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: hags
>>Chucky Schumer is on FNC talking about Miers right now and he seems very happy!<<

I wanted the filibuster fight that I was so hoping for before the gang of 14 appointed themselves the boss.
225 posted on 10/03/2005 12:06:27 PM PDT by p23185
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: BushisTheMan
And Souter? And Kennedy?

Some men and women just give themselves over to evil. O'Conner seems to flip flop, as evidenced by the poor sodomy ruling.

226 posted on 10/03/2005 12:13:28 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Truly amazing! We have not had a hearing yet and all the pundits have it all figured. Me,I'll wait for the hearings and hope some factual information comes out.


227 posted on 10/03/2005 12:15:10 PM PDT by jos65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris1
He signed it admitting it was unconstitutional.

I've wondered why that isn't considered an impeachable offense--it certainly violated his oath of office.

228 posted on 10/03/2005 12:16:16 PM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: TBP
I don't know anything about judges, or the courts, or who's qualified to champion conservative values.

But, I do know something about logical reasoning. If you start with an untrue set of assumptions, you're going to get the untrue, illogical conclusions that follow.

The absurdity we're starting with here is the assumption that someone can both be a globalist and support conservative US values at home....the two concepts are in themselves contradictory.

229 posted on 10/03/2005 12:18:49 PM PDT by grania ("Won't get fooled again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Bush then nominates a true constitutionalist, and an exhausted Senate Dem club doesn't have the energy or will to oppose him/her.

I don't buy it. People don't lose energy when they win.

230 posted on 10/03/2005 12:31:39 PM PDT by Dave Olson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
KRISTOL doesn't believe that a liberal could ever really change and become a true conservative .....

That is except in the case of his father and all his friends.

231 posted on 10/03/2005 12:39:02 PM PDT by jd777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
... have to agree with Kristol ...

Plus ...
a pick made from a position of weakness, as Rush said
Bush crony
not qualified
Stealth nominee
demoralizing to the whole conservative base
... NOT going to bring out the base in '06 and '08

232 posted on 10/03/2005 12:52:11 PM PDT by Babu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beebuster2000

If GW wanted EASY he should have picked another job.


233 posted on 10/03/2005 2:56:20 PM PDT by JustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom
Pppfffttt...Kristol?? Geeesh...that really shakes me up!

Would you rather have Michelle Malkin or Ann Coulter? Because they're opposed to Miers too.
234 posted on 10/03/2005 2:59:13 PM PDT by JohnBDay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JohnBDay
Would you rather have Michelle Malkin or Ann Coulter? Because they're opposed to Miers too

And? So? Coulter went hillary like ballistic over Roberts. One had to dodge the ashtrays reading her spitefulness towards Roberts.

235 posted on 10/03/2005 3:04:48 PM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: JohnBDay
Would you rather have Michelle Malkin or Ann Coulter? Because they're opposed to Miers too.

BFD. Malkin hates President Bush and everything he does and Coulter spewed so much venom toward Roberts that it created a haz-mat emergency.

236 posted on 10/03/2005 3:06:42 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Cindy Sheehan, Pat Buchanan, John Conyers, and David Duke Are Just Different Sides of the Same Coin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
I'm willing to bet this is a "throw away" nomination.
We pause this thread for an Activist message. Avoid your next Brownie moment! The House has passed HR 3132 The Child Saftey Act, which unfortunately had a late amendment by Rep. Conyers (D) that is a Hate Crimes bill. Call your Senator on the phone.

HR 3132 is not yet scheduled for discussion in the Senate, but don't let them sneak it past us because we're not vigilant.

Here are related threads on FR.

H.R.3132 TITLE X--LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT HATE CRIMES PREVENTION

Hate-crime language doesn't belong in bill

Hate Crimes Amendment Passes House


237 posted on 10/03/2005 3:40:19 PM PDT by Anthem (Never mind the love, where's the muscle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

RE: The five justices who voted for the eminent domain case are still on the Court.

You may be happily surprised how the reasoning of Chief Justice Roberts may alter the thinking of one of those Justices.


238 posted on 10/03/2005 7:46:58 PM PDT by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

So now it is "men and women"

But O'Conner didn't vote for the private property insanity.


239 posted on 10/04/2005 12:35:57 PM PDT by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Babu

By the 06 vote, many on this thread will know whether President Bush was RIGHT or wrong. Then act accordingly.

And if he is right and these two judges are closet convervatives, what will you do then?


240 posted on 10/04/2005 12:38:34 PM PDT by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-245 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson