DFU FR Exclusive - Larry King covers for Hillary $1MM campaign fraud in discussion with Ann Coulter

FR Exclusivie | 9/29/05 | Doug From Upland

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

Pursuant to discussion today with Peter Paul--Doug from Upland reports that Larry King on his show last night did his best to cover up for Hillary Clinton's 2000 campaign finance fraud. For those who have not begun to follow the story on FreeRepublic, this is the biggest known campaign finance fraud in history. Last night on Larry King Live, during a discussion of Tom DeLay's indictment, Ann Coulter mentioned a million dollars that Hillary has never declared. LARRY KING IMMEDIATELY SHUT DOWN THAT DISCUSSION.

According to Peter, Larry King attended some of Hillary's California fundraising events in 2000. While Peter could not state with certainty that Larry had attended the gala fundraising concert, nevertheless Larry King is spiking the discussion. What does he know? What does he not want known?

Larry King is no doubt aware that a HUGE amount of money was spent for Hillary--that she has never declared as in-kind campaign contributions. Perhaps it is time for the press to be investigating Hillary. This, on the day the Tom DeLay indictment news broke. If the media is so concerned about campaign finance fraud, they should not chase minnows, they should be pursuing the Great White Shark of campaign finance fraud.

Why is Larry avoiding the topic of Hillary's fraud on his show? One wonders if he knows as much about Hillary's fraud as he does about suspenders and divorce proceedings.

Freepers wishing to urge Hillary to declare the money might contact her office....

Perhaps a NY version of Ronnie Earle can get onto this case and bring Hillary to justice?

Reporting from the Liberal Mecca of Austin, TX, -- Doug From Upland P.S. There are some insane people in this Leftist town!

(Notice to Matt Drudge, New York Times, Los Angeles Times and Washington Post--you are free to use this with attribution to FreeRepublic.com.)

posted for DFU by Blurblogger

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

Ha! Go Coulter go! Ha ha! And yes, L.King-of-BS obviously knew something, or he wouldn't have shut the conversation down. Most people, when hearing something of that level, would be curious.

[lionheart 247365]

Thanks for the ping!

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

PETER PAUL's post on this thread (please help get it to honest media!):

This is Peter Paul responding to the inability for my fellow Freepers to judge from the transcript what really happened when Larry shut Ann down as she began to touch on the significance of Rosen's trial for her campaign's fraudulent reports about the amount given by, and identity of, her largest contributor by far. Me. If you see a video replay you will see that suddenly Larry aggressively jumped in in mid sentence and startled Ann with a totally different direction posed by his question. Her efforts to respond were then deflected and someone else took over.

The sinister issue behind this is that Larry was closely involved with me when I hosted and underwrote all three fundraisers I did for her! 1) Hillary's VIP lunch at Spago on June 9, 2000, and 2) the Tea for 150 Hollywood types immediately afterward,(Melanie Griffith, Sean Young, Morgan Fairchild, Olivia Newton John etc) attended by Larry and his wife. Larry's wife, Shaun, attended the VIP lunch (where I sat with Hillary and chatted- as caught on my home video camera- for more than an hour.) The Gala was attended by the chief fundraiser form the Mormon Church, I dont have his name handy, it was Keith or Kevin something, and he worked closely with my producer Aaron Tonken. He arranged for my partner Stan Lee to be interviewed on Larry King's show in exchange for a $25,000 contribution to a Mormon charity he administered and Shaun King was involved in. Larry came to my office in late July, with mutual friends of ours, where I related my efforts to hire Bill Clinton to work with me when he left the White House and how I was becoming a major contributor to Hillary's campaign in the process.

Larry's best childhood friend from Brooklyn, Sid xxxx, is an old friend of mine and also filled Larry in on my plans. Sid also attended the Gala. I am not sure if Larry was there with his wife or not. But certainly, since Larry had Hillary and Cher on his show together the night after the Gala where they talked about it, Larry did not act ethically when he stopped Ann from delving into the subject. We should complain to CNN that Larry hides his personal agenda from viewers who dont know he contributed to Hillary's campaign through MY Spago luncheon June 8. Then he stops his guests in mid sentence from describing the largest campaign finance fraud on record while he talks about Republican ethics issues. Freepers should be outraged that CNN allows him to prostitute his show that way.

27 posted on 09/29/2005 3:45:15 PM PDT by krucader_bravepages_com (the mother of all whistleblowers)



Doug from Upland "Peter Paul & Hillary" PING!

Latest News on Hillary Scandals

Latest News on The Truth About Hillary



Ping List ADD/REMOVE--FReepmail Blurblogger, not DFU--DO NOT use the "PostReply" function, I might not see your request if you don't FReepmail me, thanks.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[peacebaby]

This gets more interesting by the week. When is it going to blow? I'm so very impatient.

[prairiebreeze]

I'd be happy to complain to Communist News Network...if I thought it'd do one particle of good.

[OXENinFLA]

Ping to #43

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

Thanks for the ping and bump.

DFU is out of town on biz, without convenient FR access and will soon be back to add to this thread personally, meanwhile I'm posting for him.

[P8riot]

Perhaps it is time for the press to be investigating Hillary.

Yeah, like that'll ever happen.

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

"I'd be happy to complain to Communist News Network...if I thought it'd do one particle of good."


It won't. Pressure point is their advertisers. You've heard "remember the Alamo"? Remember Michael Graham! -- and what pressure on advertisers can make happen. (MG lost his job in D.C. after a CAIR campaign vs. advertisers)

[Alamo-Girl]

Exactly! The press is in it for the money - e.g. "if it bleeds, it leads". A serious campaign against advertisers - or anything that reduces their market share in viewers/subscribers - will get their attention.

[savedbygrace]

His FR Homepage says he's a SUPPORTER of Peter Paul. His post says he is Peter Paul. Hmmmmm?

[Yaelle]

I don't send this because I don't want to end up like Vince Foster. A suicide who shot himself at one location and placed his body at another location.

Which was rather clever of him. I know how "distraught" he was, and how he still managed to traipse so many yards into a muddy park without getting one molecule of dirt on his shoes is amazing. Oh, and how he made his blood run uphill was a pretty neat trick, too. Guess hanging out with the Clintons really gives you superpowers.

[savedbygrace]

Your FR Homepage says you're a supporter of Peter Paul, and your post seems to say you are Peter Paul.

Please clarify.

[Yaelle]

Fascinating. How to get this out to the American people? The ones who don't read news online or listen to talk radio?

[upchuck]

I'm confused. (I know, what's unusual about that? :)

In comment 27 it says, "This is Peter Paul..." as if Peter Paul himself wrote the comment. That comment was written by FReeper krucader_bravepages_com. His FR page is signed, way down at the bottom, "Daniel Morgan, PhD."

Is krucader_bravepages_com Peter Paul or Daniel Morgan. Maybe Peter Paul and Daniel Morgan are the same person?

[The Spirit Of Allegiance]

Peter may have communicated the information to Daniel Morgan, who posted it, much as DFU communicated the original thread info to me and I posted it. Going by the profile page, that's what I conclude is probably the sequence of events.

Or, as you suggest, they may be one and the same. Regardless, the issue remains the prosecution of course!

[krucader_bravepages_com]

My home page was created via a sub rosa wireless connection I had established to link my court ordered lap top to the internet when I was a detainee in a Brazilian dungeon in 2002 awaiting extradition back to the US. The US government used extradition to detain me in Brazil for over two years and to unsuccessfully coerce me to plead guilty to a stock fraud indictment that they promptly changed after I returned. I was preparing to return voluntarily from my legal residence in Brazil (where I had maintained a successful publishing company since 1997)to defend against the charges brought in the Eastern District of New York which my lawyer at the time, Larry Klayman, said was politically motivated. On advice of counsel I was waiting to return to the US until I received assurances from then Asst Atty General Michael Chertoff that he would intervene in supervising my prosecution. The very day that those assurances were delivered to Klayman in Washington I was arrested in my home in Brazil (where I had conducted an interview with ABC 20/20 seen by more than 10 million US households on July 13, 2001). Notwithstanding Klayman's delivery in November, 2001, of 59,873 petitions to Atty General Ashcroft from my supporters asking that I be allowed to return to the US voluntarily, the government refused to withdraw its exrtradition request and allow me to return voluntarily, and used its influence to delay the Brazilian legal process for 26 months. When I secretly joined Free Republic I could not disclose I was communicating from my dungeon cell and was forced to refer to myself with a nom de plum. Now that I have finally been released from pre-trial detention after 43 months without a speedy trial (because the government convinced the court my case of 1 count of a 10(b)5 violation is more complex than Enron and WorldCom were for preparation for trial and required 48 months of trial preparation) and without bail, I am now able to communicate outside of detention as myself.

[savedbygrace]

Thank you, Mr. Paul. We appreciate what you're doing and will do what we can to help.

I hope you understand my confusion about that post.

[ItsForTheChildren]

Perhaps a NY version of Ronnie Earle can get onto this case and bring Hillary to justice?

Where is Eliot Spitzer.