Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DFU FR Exclusive - Larry King covers for Hillary $1MM campaign fraud in discussion with Ann Coulter
FR Exclusivie | 9/29/05 | Doug From Upland

Posted on 09/29/2005 11:14:30 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: Blurblogger
Regardless, the issue remains the prosecution of course!

Absolutely!! And may it be soon, very harsh and long lasting.

61 posted on 09/30/2005 10:54:40 AM PDT by upchuck (A fireman running up the stairs at the WTC as the towers began to collapse: HERO defined ~ Ben Stein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

bump


62 posted on 09/30/2005 11:37:38 AM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger
[ We should complain to CNN that Larry hides his personal agenda from viewers who dont know he contributed to Hillary's campaign through MY Spago luncheon June 8. Then he stops his guests in mid sentence from describing the largest campaign finance fraud on record while he talks about Republican ethics issues. Freepers should be outraged that CNN allows him to prostitute his show that way. ]

Peter this post smacks of you being a Pollyanna, but you, being Peter Paul are a proven, No Pollyanna.. whats up with that?.. CNN is the Clinton News Network.. Most here know that.. and Bush his Daddy and Bill Clinton are "Buds".. and the Senate cut him(Bubba) loose on Chinagate... campaign fraud is a picayune crime comparatively..

Republicans could care less about voter fraud too.. and with a Souter clone(Roberts) due to be installed as Chief Justice.. the odds of any justice being felt in the U.S. are becomeing more remote.. Hopefully Bushs next appointment won't be a Ginsberg clone.. could happen though.. You(Bush) hang around with Dogs(Clintons) you could come up with the mange.. fleas would be a blessing in that case..

63 posted on 09/30/2005 11:39:27 AM PDT by hosepipe (This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

It's for sure CNN can't claim to be "fair and balanced", that's why it's referred to as the commie news network . Larry is just one of the many Kool-aid spin miesters for this commie production , where the truth is rarely reported .


64 posted on 09/30/2005 11:53:06 AM PDT by lionheart 247365 (( I.S.L.A.M. stands for - Islams Spiritual Leaders Advocate Murder .. .. .. ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

Isn't it amazing how things are starting to link full-circle? Hillary-fundraiser-Peter Paul-Doug from Upland-Larry King-CNN-Ann Coulter- [back to Hillary fundraiser] New Media clashes with Old Media in the strangest ways these days. FRegards....


65 posted on 09/30/2005 3:35:56 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Rules are no better than the SOB who comes up with them. Remember the Gorelick Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

' The press is in it for the money - e.g. "if it bleeds, it leads". '

If that were true, your Downside Legacy would be their show prep every day. Nope. It's not profits and ratings so much as an agenda of death and socialism. Thank God the New Media is winning the Credibility War. If only the GOP had fully realized that in the late 90s.


66 posted on 09/30/2005 3:45:09 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Rules are no better than the SOB who comes up with them. Remember the Gorelick Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March; backhoe; doug from upland; Tony Snow

thanks for the ping.

Cross-reference to Mark Levin thread Mark Levin on DeLay:


////

I haven't seen the comments of Former DOJ official Barbara Comstock (from Michelle Malkin's site) posted on FR. These comments show that there was no crime at all, zero, nothing. Here are those comments:

Ronnie Earle argues that Tom DeLay conspired to make a contribution to a political party in violation of the Texas Election Code. There was no contribution to a political party in violation of the Texas Election Code. There was no conspiracy. Ronnie Earle is wrong on the facts. Ronnie Earle is wrong on the law.
According to the indictment, the conspiracy was to unlawfully make a political contribution of corporate funds to a political party within 60 days of an election.

The Texas Election Code clearly states that "A corporation or labor organization may not knowingly make a contribution [to a political party] during a period beginning on the 60th day before the date of a general election for state and county officers and continuing through the day of the election." Title 15, Texas Election Code, § 253.104. Texas law also states in part that "A person commits criminal conspiracy if, with intent that a felony be committed: (1) he agrees with one or more persons that they or one or more of them engage in conduct that would constitute the offense; and (2) he or one or more of them performs an overt act in pursuance of the agreement."

The Problems with Earle's case:

In an effort to contrive jurisdiction over DeLay, Earle charges that because Congressman DeLay may have known about the transaction before it occurred, he was then part of a conspiracy.

However, Earle's office has sworn testimony and other exculpatory evidence showing that Congressman DeLay did not have knowledge of the transaction.

In addition:

No corporation or labor organization was indicted in this conspiracy. Neither Jim Ellis nor John Colyandro is a corporation or labor organization.

No corporation or labor organization made a contribution during 60 days of an election.

What constitutes a contribution under the Texas Election Code is not strictly defined.

Neither the RNC nor RNSEC constitute a political party under Texas election law. They are considered PACs, just as the DNC is.

Corporations in Texas could have legally made contributions to the RNC or RNSEC during the period in question under Texas election law.

There was no violation of the Texas Election Code. There was no conspiracy. The underlying transaction was legal. Had corporations sent money directly to the RNC or RNSEC, the transaction would be legal. How could anyone conspire to do indirectly what could legally have been done directly?

322 posted on 09/30/2005 7:02:46 AM PDT by Doneel
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1493009/posts?page=322#322


67 posted on 09/30/2005 3:46:43 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger; Doneel

Now it gets even stranger, seeing how Coulter, in her usual brilliance, links the Peter Paul/Hillary matter with Tom DeLay in the comparison. I can't think of a more direct and painful comparison.

FRegards....


68 posted on 09/30/2005 4:09:12 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Rules are no better than the SOB who comes up with them. Remember the Gorelick Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

Either way, he's dead.


69 posted on 09/30/2005 5:53:55 PM PDT by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: longfellow

See #58.


70 posted on 09/30/2005 6:16:14 PM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

Thanks for the links and the update.


71 posted on 09/30/2005 6:42:23 PM PDT by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

Ok but he didn't answer my ? about getting involved with stan lee. I would like an answer before he get's offed.


72 posted on 09/30/2005 7:27:57 PM PDT by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: krucader_bravepages_com

Paragraphs are our friends.


73 posted on 09/30/2005 7:45:54 PM PDT by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Truly, the new media is winning! Thank you so much for your post!


74 posted on 09/30/2005 9:19:43 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: FlashBack

"...can DeLay's people bring charges up on this "clown" for the obvious laws/ethics he's broken???"

They could but I don't know if they will.

Something else I saw on GOPUSA. Their making a movie of this Earle (prosecutor) guy and have been following him everywhere. It'd be funny, if he falls flat on his face, to see whether or not they'll release it.


75 posted on 09/30/2005 9:56:08 PM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: krucader_bravepages_com
Hillary Campaign Fraud Bump.

This topic deserves longer legs.

76 posted on 09/30/2005 11:21:38 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Fruit of the Spirit

I'd heard something about the Ronnie Earle Pet Detective movie too...this guy needs to be brought up on ethics charges or something!!
He had to shop this to four or five Grand Jury's before getting one to "bite" in what I understand is VERY strong Democratic territory...what a pinhead!


77 posted on 10/01/2005 6:50:07 PM PDT by FlashBack (When I grow up I wanna be a coWboy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

I just wish the New Media would look into the Downside Legacy now and then. Recent history is almost always more shocking than 'the latest'.


78 posted on 10/02/2005 4:56:46 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Rules are no better than the SOB who comes up with them. Remember the Gorelick Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger
If the media is so concerned about campaign finance fraud, they should not chase minnows, they should be pursuing the Great White Shark of campaign finance fraud.

did someone try to break in line at the buffet again?

79 posted on 10/02/2005 5:03:11 AM PDT by alrea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger
Perhaps a NY version of Ronnie Earle can get onto this case and bring Hillary to justice?

Why that would be Eliot Spitzer, of course, crusader for justice in the Great State of New York.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Aren't I funny? I came up with that on my own. Eliot Spitzer prosecuting a (Democrat) criminal. What a laugh.

80 posted on 10/02/2005 5:10:21 AM PDT by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson