Posted on 09/29/2005 11:14:30 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance
Absolutely!! And may it be soon, very harsh and long lasting.
bump
Peter this post smacks of you being a Pollyanna, but you, being Peter Paul are a proven, No Pollyanna.. whats up with that?.. CNN is the Clinton News Network.. Most here know that.. and Bush his Daddy and Bill Clinton are "Buds".. and the Senate cut him(Bubba) loose on Chinagate... campaign fraud is a picayune crime comparatively..
Republicans could care less about voter fraud too.. and with a Souter clone(Roberts) due to be installed as Chief Justice.. the odds of any justice being felt in the U.S. are becomeing more remote.. Hopefully Bushs next appointment won't be a Ginsberg clone.. could happen though.. You(Bush) hang around with Dogs(Clintons) you could come up with the mange.. fleas would be a blessing in that case..
It's for sure CNN can't claim to be "fair and balanced", that's why it's referred to as the commie news network . Larry is just one of the many Kool-aid spin miesters for this commie production , where the truth is rarely reported .
Isn't it amazing how things are starting to link full-circle? Hillary-fundraiser-Peter Paul-Doug from Upland-Larry King-CNN-Ann Coulter- [back to Hillary fundraiser] New Media clashes with Old Media in the strangest ways these days. FRegards....
' The press is in it for the money - e.g. "if it bleeds, it leads". '
If that were true, your Downside Legacy would be their show prep every day. Nope. It's not profits and ratings so much as an agenda of death and socialism. Thank God the New Media is winning the Credibility War. If only the GOP had fully realized that in the late 90s.
thanks for the ping.
Cross-reference to Mark Levin thread Mark Levin on DeLay:
////
I haven't seen the comments of Former DOJ official Barbara Comstock (from Michelle Malkin's site) posted on FR. These comments show that there was no crime at all, zero, nothing. Here are those comments:
Ronnie Earle argues that Tom DeLay conspired to make a contribution to a political party in violation of the Texas Election Code. There was no contribution to a political party in violation of the Texas Election Code. There was no conspiracy. Ronnie Earle is wrong on the facts. Ronnie Earle is wrong on the law.
According to the indictment, the conspiracy was to unlawfully make a political contribution of corporate funds to a political party within 60 days of an election.
The Texas Election Code clearly states that "A corporation or labor organization may not knowingly make a contribution [to a political party] during a period beginning on the 60th day before the date of a general election for state and county officers and continuing through the day of the election." Title 15, Texas Election Code, § 253.104. Texas law also states in part that "A person commits criminal conspiracy if, with intent that a felony be committed: (1) he agrees with one or more persons that they or one or more of them engage in conduct that would constitute the offense; and (2) he or one or more of them performs an overt act in pursuance of the agreement."
The Problems with Earle's case:
In an effort to contrive jurisdiction over DeLay, Earle charges that because Congressman DeLay may have known about the transaction before it occurred, he was then part of a conspiracy.
However, Earle's office has sworn testimony and other exculpatory evidence showing that Congressman DeLay did not have knowledge of the transaction.
In addition:
No corporation or labor organization was indicted in this conspiracy. Neither Jim Ellis nor John Colyandro is a corporation or labor organization.
No corporation or labor organization made a contribution during 60 days of an election.
What constitutes a contribution under the Texas Election Code is not strictly defined.
Neither the RNC nor RNSEC constitute a political party under Texas election law. They are considered PACs, just as the DNC is.
Corporations in Texas could have legally made contributions to the RNC or RNSEC during the period in question under Texas election law.
There was no violation of the Texas Election Code. There was no conspiracy. The underlying transaction was legal. Had corporations sent money directly to the RNC or RNSEC, the transaction would be legal. How could anyone conspire to do indirectly what could legally have been done directly?
322 posted on 09/30/2005 7:02:46 AM PDT by Doneel
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1493009/posts?page=322#322
Now it gets even stranger, seeing how Coulter, in her usual brilliance, links the Peter Paul/Hillary matter with Tom DeLay in the comparison. I can't think of a more direct and painful comparison.
FRegards....
Either way, he's dead.
See #58.
Thanks for the links and the update.
Ok but he didn't answer my ? about getting involved with stan lee. I would like an answer before he get's offed.
Paragraphs are our friends.
Truly, the new media is winning! Thank you so much for your post!
"...can DeLay's people bring charges up on this "clown" for the obvious laws/ethics he's broken???"
They could but I don't know if they will.
Something else I saw on GOPUSA. Their making a movie of this Earle (prosecutor) guy and have been following him everywhere. It'd be funny, if he falls flat on his face, to see whether or not they'll release it.
This topic deserves longer legs.
I'd heard something about the Ronnie Earle Pet Detective movie too...this guy needs to be brought up on ethics charges or something!!
He had to shop this to four or five Grand Jury's before getting one to "bite" in what I understand is VERY strong Democratic territory...what a pinhead!
I just wish the New Media would look into the Downside Legacy now and then. Recent history is almost always more shocking than 'the latest'.
did someone try to break in line at the buffet again?
Why that would be Eliot Spitzer, of course, crusader for justice in the Great State of New York.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Aren't I funny? I came up with that on my own. Eliot Spitzer prosecuting a (Democrat) criminal. What a laugh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.