Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DFU FR Exclusive - Larry King covers for Hillary $1MM campaign fraud in discussion with Ann Coulter
FR Exclusivie | 9/29/05 | Doug From Upland

Posted on 09/29/2005 11:14:30 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance

Pursuant to discussion today with Peter Paul--Doug from Upland reports that Larry King on his show last night did his best to cover up for Hillary Clinton's 2000 campaign finance fraud. For those who have not begun to follow the story on FreeRepublic, this is the biggest known campaign finance fraud in history. Last night on Larry King Live, during a discussion of Tom DeLay's indictment, Ann Coulter mentioned a million dollars that Hillary has never declared. LARRY KING IMMEDIATELY SHUT DOWN THAT DISCUSSION.

According to Peter, Larry King attended some of Hillary's California fundraising events in 2000. While Peter could not state with certainty that Larry had attended the gala fundraising concert, nevertheless Larry King is spiking the discussion. What does he know? What does he not want known?

Larry King is no doubt aware that a HUGE amount of money was spent for Hillary--that she has never declared as in-kind campaign contributions. Perhaps it is time for the press to be investigating Hillary. This, on the day the Tom DeLay indictment news broke. If the media is so concerned about campaign finance fraud, they should not chase minnows, they should be pursuing the Great White Shark of campaign finance fraud.

Why is Larry avoiding the topic of Hillary's fraud on his show? One wonders if he knows as much about Hillary's fraud as he does about suspenders and divorce proceedings.

Freepers wishing to urge Hillary to declare the money might contact her office....

Perhaps a NY version of Ronnie Earle can get onto this case and bring Hillary to justice?

Reporting from the Liberal Mecca of Austin, TX, -- Doug From Upland P.S. There are some insane people in this Leftist town!

(Notice to Matt Drudge, New York Times, Los Angeles Times and Washington Post--you are free to use this with attribution to FreeRepublic.com.)

posted for DFU by Blurblogger


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: clinton; clintons; delay; fraud; hillary; hillaryscandals; peterpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: Blurblogger; doug from upland

Ha! Go Coulter go! Ha ha! And yes, L.King-of-BS obviously knew something, or he wouldn't have shut the conversation down. Most people, when hearing something of that level, would be curious.


41 posted on 09/30/2005 6:23:36 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Rules are no better than the SOB who comes up with them. Remember the Gorelick Wall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

Thanks for the ping!


42 posted on 09/30/2005 7:51:13 AM PDT by lionheart 247365 (( I.S.L.A.M. stands for - Islams Spiritual Leaders Advocate Murder .. .. .. ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob; Buckhead; Howlin; Nick Danger; Alamo-Girl; Mia T; Peach; backhoe; ...
PETER PAUL's post on this thread (please help get it to honest media!):

This is Peter Paul responding to the inability for my fellow Freepers to judge from the transcript what really happened when Larry shut Ann down as she began to touch on the significance of Rosen's trial for her campaign's fraudulent reports about the amount given by, and identity of, her largest contributor by far. Me. If you see a video replay you will see that suddenly Larry aggressively jumped in in mid sentence and startled Ann with a totally different direction posed by his question. Her efforts to respond were then deflected and someone else took over.

The sinister issue behind this is that Larry was closely involved with me when I hosted and underwrote all three fundraisers I did for her! 1) Hillary's VIP lunch at Spago on June 9, 2000, and 2) the Tea for 150 Hollywood types immediately afterward,(Melanie Griffith, Sean Young, Morgan Fairchild, Olivia Newton John etc) attended by Larry and his wife. Larry's wife, Shaun, attended the VIP lunch (where I sat with Hillary and chatted- as caught on my home video camera- for more than an hour.) The Gala was attended by the chief fundraiser form the Mormon Church, I dont have his name handy, it was Keith or Kevin something, and he worked closely with my producer Aaron Tonken. He arranged for my partner Stan Lee to be interviewed on Larry King's show in exchange for a $25,000 contribution to a Mormon charity he administered and Shaun King was involved in. Larry came to my office in late July, with mutual friends of ours, where I related my efforts to hire Bill Clinton to work with me when he left the White House and how I was becoming a major contributor to Hillary's campaign in the process.

Larry's best childhood friend from Brooklyn, Sid xxxx, is an old friend of mine and also filled Larry in on my plans. Sid also attended the Gala. I am not sure if Larry was there with his wife or not. But certainly, since Larry had Hillary and Cher on his show together the night after the Gala where they talked about it, Larry did not act ethically when he stopped Ann from delving into the subject. We should complain to CNN that Larry hides his personal agenda from viewers who dont know he contributed to Hillary's campaign through MY Spago luncheon June 8. Then he stops his guests in mid sentence from describing the largest campaign finance fraud on record while he talks about Republican ethics issues. Freepers should be outraged that CNN allows him to prostitute his show that way.

27 posted on 09/29/2005 3:45:15 PM PDT by krucader_bravepages_com (the mother of all whistleblowers)




Doug from Upland "Peter Paul & Hillary" PING!

Latest News on Hillary Scandals

Latest News on The Truth About Hillary



Ping List ADD/REMOVE--FReepmail Blurblogger, not DFU--DO NOT use the "PostReply" function, I might not see your request if you don't FReepmail me, thanks.

43 posted on 09/30/2005 8:36:26 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

Thanks for the ping!


44 posted on 09/30/2005 8:41:31 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

This gets more interesting by the week. When is it going to blow? I'm so very impatient.


45 posted on 09/30/2005 8:48:40 AM PDT by peacebaby (Wasting my time standing in the waiting line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

I'd be happy to complain to Communist News Network...if I thought it'd do one particle of good.


46 posted on 09/30/2005 8:51:33 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (Take the high road. You'll never have to meet a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...

Ping to #43


47 posted on 09/30/2005 8:55:09 AM PDT by OXENinFLA (Ample parking day or night, people spouting,"Howdy neighbor!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA

Thanks for the ping and bump.

DFU is out of town on biz, without convenient FR access and will soon be back to add to this thread personally, meanwhile I'm posting for him.


48 posted on 09/30/2005 8:59:18 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger
Perhaps it is time for the press to be investigating Hillary.

Yeah, like that'll ever happen.

49 posted on 09/30/2005 9:01:49 AM PDT by P8riot (Growing old is mandatory, growing up is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze; bert; Alamo-Girl; OXENinFLA

"I'd be happy to complain to Communist News Network...if I thought it'd do one particle of good."


It won't. Pressure point is their advertisers. You've heard "remember the Alamo"? Remember Michael Graham! -- and what pressure on advertisers can make happen. (MG lost his job in D.C. after a CAIR campaign vs. advertisers)


50 posted on 09/30/2005 9:02:07 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

Exactly! The press is in it for the money - e.g. "if it bleeds, it leads". A serious campaign against advertisers - or anything that reduces their market share in viewers/subscribers - will get their attention.


51 posted on 09/30/2005 9:13:05 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: longfellow

His FR Homepage says he's a SUPPORTER of Peter Paul. His post says he is Peter Paul. Hmmmmm?


52 posted on 09/30/2005 9:18:45 AM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: HighlyOpinionated
I don't send this because I don't want to end up like Vince Foster. A suicide who shot himself at one location and placed his body at another location.

Which was rather clever of him. I know how "distraught" he was, and how he still managed to traipse so many yards into a muddy park without getting one molecule of dirt on his shoes is amazing. Oh, and how he made his blood run uphill was a pretty neat trick, too. Guess hanging out with the Clintons really gives you superpowers.

53 posted on 09/30/2005 9:20:33 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: krucader_bravepages_com

Your FR Homepage says you're a supporter of Peter Paul, and your post seems to say you are Peter Paul.

Please clarify.


54 posted on 09/30/2005 9:20:49 AM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

Fascinating. How to get this out to the American people? The ones who don't read news online or listen to talk radio?


55 posted on 09/30/2005 9:23:41 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger
I'm confused. (I know, what's unusual about that? :)

In comment 27 it says, "This is Peter Paul..." as if Peter Paul himself wrote the comment. That comment was written by FReeper krucader_bravepages_com. His FR page is signed, way down at the bottom, "Daniel Morgan, PhD."

Is krucader_bravepages_com Peter Paul or Daniel Morgan. Maybe Peter Paul and Daniel Morgan are the same person?

56 posted on 09/30/2005 9:46:06 AM PDT by upchuck (A fireman running up the stairs at the WTC as the towers began to collapse: HERO defined ~ Ben Stein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: upchuck; krucader_bravepages_com; doug from upland

Peter may have communicated the information to Daniel Morgan, who posted it, much as DFU communicated the original thread info to me and I posted it. Going by the profile page, that's what I conclude is probably the sequence of events.

Or, as you suggest, they may be one and the same. Regardless, the issue remains the prosecution of course!



57 posted on 09/30/2005 10:01:01 AM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
My home page was created via a sub rosa wireless connection I had established to link my court ordered lap top to the internet when I was a detainee in a Brazilian dungeon in 2002 awaiting extradition back to the US. The US government used extradition to detain me in Brazil for over two years and to unsuccessfully coerce me to plead guilty to a stock fraud indictment that they promptly changed after I returned. I was preparing to return voluntarily from my legal residence in Brazil (where I had maintained a successful publishing company since 1997)to defend against the charges brought in the Eastern District of New York which my lawyer at the time, Larry Klayman, said was politically motivated. On advice of counsel I was waiting to return to the US until I received assurances from then Asst Atty General Michael Chertoff that he would intervene in supervising my prosecution. The very day that those assurances were delivered to Klayman in Washington I was arrested in my home in Brazil (where I had conducted an interview with ABC 20/20 seen by more than 10 million US households on July 13, 2001). Notwithstanding Klayman's delivery in November, 2001, of 59,873 petitions to Atty General Ashcroft from my supporters asking that I be allowed to return to the US voluntarily, the government refused to withdraw its exrtradition request and allow me to return voluntarily, and used its influence to delay the Brazilian legal process for 26 months. When I secretly joined Free Republic I could not disclose I was communicating from my dungeon cell and was forced to refer to myself with a nom de plum. Now that I have finally been released from pre-trial detention after 43 months without a speedy trial (because the government convinced the court my case of 1 count of a 10(b)5 violation is more complex than Enron and WorldCom were for preparation for trial and required 48 months of trial preparation) and without bail, I am now able to communicate outside of detention as myself.
58 posted on 09/30/2005 10:11:10 AM PDT by krucader_bravepages_com (the mother of all whistleblowers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: krucader_bravepages_com

Thank you, Mr. Paul. We appreciate what you're doing and will do what we can to help.

I hope you understand my confusion about that post.


59 posted on 09/30/2005 10:17:57 AM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger
Perhaps a NY version of Ronnie Earle can get onto this case and bring Hillary to justice?

Where is Eliot Spitzer.

60 posted on 09/30/2005 10:32:29 AM PDT by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson