Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Karl Rove to POTUS: Put Gonzales on the Court
ConfirmThem.com ^ | September 26, 2005 | Erick Erickson

Posted on 09/26/2005 11:20:16 AM PDT by Oliver Optic

This is a recent post by Erick on ConfirmThem.com blog (a project of RedState.org):

Word in legal circles is that Priscilla Owen is set to become the next justice appointed to the United States Supreme Court.

Unfortunately, I have received reliable information late this afternoon that Karl Rove, among others, is making a last minute push for the President to consider Alberto Gonzales, despite previous assurances from inside the White House, Justice Department, and Senate that Gonzales was not being considered.

A third party source tells RedState that Rove is pushing for Gonzales and that Larry Thompson’s name has gone off the radar. This afternoon I contacted my White House source who says Karl Rove “believes that Gonzales is conservative and, given the current docket, will have time to prove it before midterm elections.”

The source says it is not a guarantee and there are significant issues at play — including confirmability. I have no word on other names, other than the usual that are already out there.

Looks like I’m going to be headed to the driving range soon.

One last point from my White House source. The source says some conservatives inside the White House, including the source, feel some “conservative frustration,” i.e. conservatives are being seen, but not heard.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agitprop; gonzales; gossip; rumor; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-122 next last
To: Oliver Optic
RedState and Confirmthem.com also led with the rumors of Edith Clement's nomination last time. They announced it was Clement first and never wavered until it was reported by ABC that Clements was NOT the choice - about 30 minutes before Bush's announcement of Roberts.

No validity to this unless the White House is playing games with the press again. The Roberts nomination really made the press look like idiots with their in-th-know sources getting it all wrong.
61 posted on 09/26/2005 12:51:06 PM PDT by Republican Red (''Van der Sloot" is Dutch for ''Kennedy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evacuee
Bush can't afford to turn Congressional Republicans against him, and Gonzales (if I'm not mistaken) is pro-choice.

Is he? What's the evidence that he is?

62 posted on 09/26/2005 1:04:09 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
Exactly what "heat" would that be?

If indeed it is the White House disseminating these endless rumors about Gonzales, then they need not be surprised if conservatives continue to call, email, post and blog about Gonzales being unacceptable.

As you say, the White House may not care one whit ... but I do recall it getting under the President's skin at least once during the last go round.

63 posted on 09/26/2005 1:04:26 PM PDT by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic
Confirms Eleanor Clift's report a few days ago. So, it is obvious this isn't a case of media bias.

It's disgraceful that Gonzales is even being considered. It shows the utter lack of principle within this administration. There is no excuse for an open originalist in the Scalia-Thomas mold not to be appointed.

Another maybe or liberal like Gonzales will assure the court remains on its leftward course for a generation.

64 posted on 09/26/2005 1:06:30 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

We should settle for nothing less than someone like Edith Jones. She even meets the proper diversity qualifications.


65 posted on 09/26/2005 1:07:46 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic

Sounds like someone is trying to get the base all roiled up.


66 posted on 09/26/2005 1:10:34 PM PDT by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
Amazing how you Bush haters will use people like Eleanor Clift just to fruther your agenda. When the President announces his nomination and it isn't Gonzales, be prepared to eat Crow.
67 posted on 09/26/2005 1:11:25 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Cindy Sheehan, Pat Buchanan, John Conyers, and David Duke Are Just Different Sides of the Same Coin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red
RR ... If I had to guess, I would say that this is indeed Edith Clement redux.

With the announcement drawing near, the Gonzales talk may be designed to gin down conservative expectations so that when the choice is actually ... say, Karen Williams ... she will seem like the second coming of Bork.

68 posted on 09/26/2005 1:13:33 PM PDT by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: green iguana

Lets just give Thomas or Scalia Two Votes.


69 posted on 09/26/2005 1:18:39 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Polls = Proof that when the MSM want your opinion they will give it to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic
Karl Rove to POTUS: Put Gonzales on the Court

Montag to Rove: STFU

70 posted on 09/26/2005 1:19:05 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic

Erick Erickson is a rumor-mongering gossip who has no sources whatsoever inside the White House.

Bookmark this thread to more fully discredit him when the actual pick is named (and isn't gonzalez).


71 posted on 09/26/2005 1:20:32 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
No clone, but a fraternal twin - Janice Rogers Brown, originalist, conservative, from the south, and African American.

Nope. Poppy and Barb probably would say "she's too MEAN"

To the Bushes, it is better to lose than to win by being "mean".

72 posted on 09/26/2005 1:21:01 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kesg
Out of curiousity, what exactly is the evidence that Alberto Gonzales is not sufficiently conservative?

Usually cited are his rulings on parental notification for minor abortions while on the Texas Supreme Court and his position on affirmative action while Attorney General.

My thought is, he is probably a good man and fairly conservative to boot. I don't like to see him unfairly demonized.

But most conservatives have a pretty strong feeling that he is nowhere near a Scalia or Thomas.

See also here.

73 posted on 09/26/2005 1:27:40 PM PDT by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death
Bush should find / appoint a CONSERVATIVE FEMALE HISPANIC!

I don't think one exists.

74 posted on 09/26/2005 1:29:04 PM PDT by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Erick Erickson is a rumor-mongering gossip who has no sources whatsoever inside the White House.

Hey, South ... those are pretty strong words. Do you know Erick?

75 posted on 09/26/2005 1:31:37 PM PDT by Oliver Optic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Oliver Optic

"Speedy Gonzales,
Why don't you go home!"


76 posted on 09/26/2005 1:32:39 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack


LOL! This is the first I've ever heard of Erick Erickson.


77 posted on 09/26/2005 1:33:47 PM PDT by onyx ((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: newfrpr04
I sure hope NOT. I can't believe that the give in to pressure to put a "minority" just to please the crowd. I rather see a strong conservative. Heck If Hillary get in, we are seeing conservative judges "retiring" and replaced with liberals .

The Dems already Borked one excellent hispanic candidate.

78 posted on 09/26/2005 1:36:17 PM PDT by MarshallDillon ( Hire the VET!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
The full Senate vote on Roberts will be on Thursday. It is unlikely that W will name someone before the Roberts confirmation is sealed. I suspect that he will name someone after that but not at the swearing in ceremony, when the spotlight is on Roberts as it well should be.

I agree with that. President Bush has indicated that he is hopeful the Senate will perfrom its advise & consent function, and his comment was phrased in such a way that he does not take an up or down vote as a gimme.

I don't believe President Bush will make another SCOTUS nomination until the Roberts nomination is disposed of. And then, as you note, he's likely to wait a few days after that before making the name of his next SCOTUS nomination public.

79 posted on 09/26/2005 1:40:26 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Clift's comments are backed up by conservative sources. What is so hard to understand about that?

Go back to drinking the Kool Aid as government spending explodes and we get more stealth maybes that won't change the direction of the Supreme Court.

80 posted on 09/26/2005 1:41:20 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson