Skip to comments.
Roberts nominated 13-5 vote
C-span 3
| 21 Sept 2005
| EDCOIL
Posted on 09/22/2005 9:52:02 AM PDT by edcoil
I am watching a Cspan 3 of the vote. Hard to read the screen but it looks like a 12 to 5 vote for Roberts to be Chief Justice.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama; US: Arizona; US: California; US: Delaware; US: Illinois; US: Iowa; US: Kansas; US: Maine; US: New York; US: Ohio; US: Oklahoma; US: Pennsylvania; US: South Carolina; US: Texas; US: Utah; US: Vermont; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 109th; anothersouter; biden; brownback; bushsfault; chiefjustice; coburn; cornyn; dewine; durbin; feingold; feinstein; graham; grassley; hatch; historyinthemaking; johnroberts; judiciarycommittee; kennedy; kohl; kyl; leahy; roberts; robertshearings; rollcall; schumer; schummer; scotus; senate; sessions; shoemore; shumer; specter; tedkennedy; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-187 next last
To: newzjunkey
I don't care if he represents "a slight move leftward."
In my opinion, it is short-sighted to pick a Justice of the Supreme Court based on his likely vote on the cases that are likely to come before the court this year or next. Once those cases are decided, new cases that can't even be contemplated today will arise.
What we really need is a Justice who will use a conservative methodology to decide cases. By nominating a justice who believes that a case should be decided by recourse to the constitution, statutes, legislative history and case law, President Bush is attempting to correct the path of the court.
During the past century, and particularly during the last several decades, the court has veered into considering foreign law and other unofficial, anecdotal and even arbitrary opinions. There would be no need to do this unless the judge were straining to find a particular result instead of trying to discover what the law is.
Even if Justice Roberts votes in favor of opinions that are not what conservatives want, he is going to be a leader in limiting the sources that the court uses in making its decisions. This is genuine non-ideological jurisprudence and it is conservative, because it returns power to the legislatures and takes it away from the unelected judges.
161
posted on
09/23/2005 7:29:49 AM PDT
by
Piranha
To: Betaille
Feingold also asked a 2nd A question from a pro-gun angle to Roberts.
162
posted on
09/23/2005 12:45:00 PM PDT
by
WOSG
(http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com/)
To: edcoil
The Democrats will probably pick any excuse to vote against the next nominee. At least the Republican majority was good for something (provided that they don't bend over for the Democrats) over the next few months.
To: dr_who_2
When a man's an empty kettle He should be on his mettle And yet I'm torn apart Just because I'm presumin' That I could be kind of human If I only had a heart I'd be tender, I'd be gentle And awful sentimental Regarding love and art I'd be friends with the sparrows And the boy that shoots the arrows If I only had a heart Picture me a balcony Above a voice sings low (Snow White) Wherefore art thou, Romeo? (Tin Man) I hear a beat, how sweet! Just to register emotion, jealousy, devotion And really feel the part I could stay young and chipper And I'd lock it with a zipper If I only had a heart
164
posted on
09/23/2005 2:12:35 PM PDT
by
ottersnot
(Kill a commie for your mommie....Johnnie Ramone. American Rocker and patriot)
To: ottersnot
So then Schumer is loosely related to Bob Dornan? (he's the nephew of Jack Haley)
To: ChronicMA
166
posted on
09/24/2005 4:16:40 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
To: RckyRaCoCo
Does anyone care that Roberts takes a stand on nothing. We don't know where he stands on key decisions?
167
posted on
09/24/2005 4:18:03 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
To: phantomworker
ecxley!!! No one can spell it. LOL. Where does he stand on the issues??????!!!!
168
posted on
09/24/2005 5:38:55 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
To: Gabz; patton
I appreciate both your opinions;
169
posted on
09/24/2005 6:20:41 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
To: phantomworker
Unless you can spell it, no dice.
170
posted on
09/24/2005 6:32:56 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
To: phantomworker; Gabz
171
posted on
09/24/2005 6:52:09 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
To: phantomworker
172
posted on
09/24/2005 6:58:15 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
To: phantomworker
I think somebody is getting tanked. And it ain't me, for a change. ;)
173
posted on
09/24/2005 7:18:36 PM PDT
by
patton
("Hard Drive Cemetary" - forthcoming best seller)
To: patton
wheer do peeple get these responses"
174
posted on
09/24/2005 7:51:06 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
To: phantomworker
From the cemetery, Babe. LOL.
175
posted on
09/24/2005 7:53:57 PM PDT
by
patton
("Hard Drive Cemetary" - forthcoming best seller)
To: patton
THere is a misunderstandingting.com
176
posted on
09/24/2005 7:56:51 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
To: patton
THere is a misunderstandingting.com
177
posted on
09/24/2005 7:56:54 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
To: phantomworker
178
posted on
09/24/2005 8:35:01 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
To: phantomworker
wish you were here. hOw do you know I love diamonds.
179
posted on
09/24/2005 8:37:54 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
To: phantomworker
obviously, have to change my PW
WHy would anyone want to change it?
180
posted on
09/24/2005 8:44:19 PM PDT
by
phantomworker
(It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-187 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson