Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roberts nominated 13-5 vote
C-span 3 | 21 Sept 2005 | EDCOIL

Posted on 09/22/2005 9:52:02 AM PDT by edcoil

I am watching a Cspan 3 of the vote. Hard to read the screen but it looks like a 12 to 5 vote for Roberts to be Chief Justice.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama; US: Arizona; US: California; US: Delaware; US: Illinois; US: Iowa; US: Kansas; US: Maine; US: New York; US: Ohio; US: Oklahoma; US: Pennsylvania; US: South Carolina; US: Texas; US: Utah; US: Vermont; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 109th; anothersouter; biden; brownback; bushsfault; chiefjustice; coburn; cornyn; dewine; durbin; feingold; feinstein; graham; grassley; hatch; historyinthemaking; johnroberts; judiciarycommittee; kennedy; kohl; kyl; leahy; roberts; robertshearings; rollcall; schumer; schummer; scotus; senate; sessions; shoemore; shumer; specter; tedkennedy; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 next last
To: newzjunkey

I don't care if he represents "a slight move leftward."

In my opinion, it is short-sighted to pick a Justice of the Supreme Court based on his likely vote on the cases that are likely to come before the court this year or next. Once those cases are decided, new cases that can't even be contemplated today will arise.

What we really need is a Justice who will use a conservative methodology to decide cases. By nominating a justice who believes that a case should be decided by recourse to the constitution, statutes, legislative history and case law, President Bush is attempting to correct the path of the court.

During the past century, and particularly during the last several decades, the court has veered into considering foreign law and other unofficial, anecdotal and even arbitrary opinions. There would be no need to do this unless the judge were straining to find a particular result instead of trying to discover what the law is.

Even if Justice Roberts votes in favor of opinions that are not what conservatives want, he is going to be a leader in limiting the sources that the court uses in making its decisions. This is genuine non-ideological jurisprudence and it is conservative, because it returns power to the legislatures and takes it away from the unelected judges.


161 posted on 09/23/2005 7:29:49 AM PDT by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Betaille

Feingold also asked a 2nd A question from a pro-gun angle to Roberts.


162 posted on 09/23/2005 12:45:00 PM PDT by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

The Democrats will probably pick any excuse to vote against the next nominee. At least the Republican majority was good for something (provided that they don't bend over for the Democrats) over the next few months.


163 posted on 09/23/2005 1:03:05 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr_who_2


When a man's an empty kettle He should be on his mettle And yet I'm torn apart Just because I'm presumin' That I could be kind of human If I only had a heart I'd be tender, I'd be gentle And awful sentimental Regarding love and art I'd be friends with the sparrows And the boy that shoots the arrows If I only had a heart Picture me a balcony Above a voice sings low (Snow White) Wherefore art thou, Romeo? (Tin Man) I hear a beat, how sweet! Just to register emotion, jealousy, devotion And really feel the part I could stay young and chipper And I'd lock it with a zipper If I only had a heart
164 posted on 09/23/2005 2:12:35 PM PDT by ottersnot (Kill a commie for your mommie....Johnnie Ramone. American Rocker and patriot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: ottersnot

So then Schumer is loosely related to Bob Dornan? (he's the nephew of Jack Haley)


165 posted on 09/23/2005 8:20:46 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: ChronicMA

Interesting question.


166 posted on 09/24/2005 4:16:40 PM PDT by phantomworker (It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RckyRaCoCo

Does anyone care that Roberts takes a stand on nothing. We don't know where he stands on key decisions?


167 posted on 09/24/2005 4:18:03 PM PDT by phantomworker (It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker

ecxley!!! No one can spell it. LOL. Where does he stand on the issues??????!!!!


168 posted on 09/24/2005 5:38:55 PM PDT by phantomworker (It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Gabz; patton

I appreciate both your opinions;


169 posted on 09/24/2005 6:20:41 PM PDT by phantomworker (It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker

Unless you can spell it, no dice.


170 posted on 09/24/2005 6:32:56 PM PDT by phantomworker (It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker; Gabz


171 posted on 09/24/2005 6:52:09 PM PDT by phantomworker (It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker

Can't spelling; LO.


172 posted on 09/24/2005 6:58:15 PM PDT by phantomworker (It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker

I think somebody is getting tanked. And it ain't me, for a change. ;)


173 posted on 09/24/2005 7:18:36 PM PDT by patton ("Hard Drive Cemetary" - forthcoming best seller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: patton


wheer do peeple get these responses"


174 posted on 09/24/2005 7:51:06 PM PDT by phantomworker (It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker

From the cemetery, Babe. LOL.


175 posted on 09/24/2005 7:53:57 PM PDT by patton ("Hard Drive Cemetary" - forthcoming best seller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: patton

THere is a misunderstandingting.com


176 posted on 09/24/2005 7:56:51 PM PDT by phantomworker (It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: patton

THere is a misunderstandingting.com


177 posted on 09/24/2005 7:56:54 PM PDT by phantomworker (It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker

not me????


178 posted on 09/24/2005 8:35:01 PM PDT by phantomworker (It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker

wish you were here. hOw do you know I love diamonds.


179 posted on 09/24/2005 8:37:54 PM PDT by phantomworker (It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: phantomworker

obviously, have to change my PW

WHy would anyone want to change it?


180 posted on 09/24/2005 8:44:19 PM PDT by phantomworker (It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson