Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Marine Jets Bomb Two Bridges in Iraq
yahoo news/AP ^ | Sept. 6, 2005

Posted on 09/06/2005 2:58:44 AM PDT by nuconvert

U.S. Marine Jets Bomb Two Bridges in Iraq

By SAMEER N. YACOUB, Associated Press Writer

U.S. Marine jets Tuesday attacked two bridges across the Euphrates River near the Syrian border to prevent insurgents from using them to move foreign fighters and munitions into major cities, the U.S. command said.

A Marine statement said U.S. and Iraqi forces also destroyed a "foreign fighter safe house," killed two foreigners and arrested three others during a raid Tuesday in the same area as the bridge attack.

The fighting occurred a day after U.N. chief Kofi Annan said Iraq had become an even greater terrorist center than the former Taliban-ruled Afghanistan. Attacks attributed to al-Qaida's wing in Iraq have increased in the Baghdad area and western Iraq.

A Marine statement said F/A-18 jets dropped bombs shortly after midnight on two light bridges near Karabilah, about 185 miles west of Baghdad.

"The purpose of the strike was to prevent al-Qaida in Iraq terrorists from using the structures," the U.S. statement said. "The munitions used in the strike were designed to crater the bridges, rendering them inoperable but not destroying them."

The clash at the safe house occurred when U.S. and Iraqi troops came under fire "by foreign fighters" occupying the building, the Marines said.

"Multinational forces personnel returned fire and assaulted the building, suffering one friendly casualty when a Multinational Force soldier was wounded," the statement said without citing the soldier's nationality.

Troops called in aircraft to destroy the building "which was being used as an operational headquarters," the statement added.

Karabilah is one of a cluster of towns near the Syrian border, a major infiltration route for foreign fighters heading for Baghdad and other major cities. Iraqi officials say al-Qaida in Iraq, led by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, has taken over parts of the area after local residents fled fighting between tribes supporting and opposing the insurgents.

Annan, speaking to the British Broadcasting Corp. on Monday, said many young Muslims are angry, and their anger has been exacerbated by what is happening in Iraq.

"They feel victimized in their own society; they feel victimized in the West. And they feel there's profiling against them," he said. "And the Iraqi situation has not helped matters."

Annan added: "One used to be worried about Afghanistan being the center of terrorist activities. My sense is that Iraq has become a major problem and in fact is worse than Afghanistan."

In statements posted on Islamic Web sites, al-Qaida in Iraq claimed responsibility for two attacks Monday — a roadside bombing that killed two British soldiers west of Basra and a daring daylight assault against the Interior Ministry in Baghdad in which two policemen died.

Also Monday, U.S. Marines said that al-Qaida in Iraq launched multiple attacks on Sunday against U.S. and Iraqi targets in Hit, 85 miles west of Baghdad. Fifteen people — including 11 civilians, an Iraqi soldier and three suicide bombers — died in the Hit attacks

Elsewhere, Iraqi officials said that al-Qaida-linked foreign fighters had taken control of large areas of a strategic city on the Syrian border after weeks of fighting between an Iraqi tribe that supports the insurgents and one that opposes them.

The officials, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal, said much of Qaim, 200 miles west of Baghdad, had been abandoned after weeks of tribal fighting.

U.S. Marines operate around Qaim but have privately complained they don't have enough American or Iraqi forces to secure the area properly.

The attacks in the Hit area began Sunday morning when two suicide car bombs exploded at security barricades on the northwest side of town, a Marine statement said.

Shortly afterward, a vehicle car bomb exploded on the Hit bridge across the Euphrates River, rendering it impassable, the Marines said.

The Marine statement said three insurgents and one Iraqi soldier died in the Sunday attacks. The government in Baghdad said eight civilians also died.

Also Monday, gunmen seized one of the sons of the governor of insurgent infested Anbar province, Mamoun Sami Rashid al-Alwani, officials said on condition of anonymity for fear of insurgent reprisal. The abduction occurred in the provincial capital of Ramadi west of Baghdad.

U.S. and Iraqi officials had hoped Iraq's new constitution, which goes to the voters in a referendum Oct. 15, would in time help pacify the insurgency by luring Sunni Arabs from the movement.

However, Sunni negotiators rejected the constitution and vowed to defeat it in the referendum. The bitter, protracted negotiations appeared to have raised tensions among the country's ethnic and religious communities.

About 1,500 people, mostly Sunnis, rallied Monday near the Sunni city of Ramadi to protest the draft charter.

Iraq's president said Monday he and the other top Kurdish leader had agreed to changes in the draft constitution to mollify concerns among Arab countries that the wording in the charter loosened Iraqi ties to the Arab world.

The language at issue describes Iraq as an Islamic — but not Arab country — a concession to the non-Arab Kurds who form about 15 percent of the Iraqi population.

In a statement released by his office, Jalal Talabani said he and Massood Barzani agreed "to accept some amendments deemed vital for the Islamic and Arab worlds concerning the Arab League because Iraq is a founding member in the Arab League."

Talabani did not specify what changes in the language had been agreed to by him and Barzani, head of the Kurdistan Democratic Party.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airstrikes; alqaeda; alqaida; bridge; iraq; karabilah; marines; oif; syria; terrorism; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 09/06/2005 2:58:45 AM PDT by nuconvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Sounds like a prelim action prior to a major attack.


2 posted on 09/06/2005 3:00:31 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus; nuconvert

Sounds like a Special Forces raid on the enemies Op center. Wonder who was in that op center.


3 posted on 09/06/2005 3:05:54 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
Let's hope so.

Is a vehicle car bomb any different from a car bomb?

4 posted on 09/06/2005 3:11:35 AM PDT by barker (If you get to thinkin' you're a person of some influence try ordering somebody else's dog around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dog

It is my impression that most of the major action being reported in the last couple of weeks has been along the Syrian border.


5 posted on 09/06/2005 3:12:42 AM PDT by Cap Huff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
the U.S. statement said. "The munitions used in the strike were designed to crater the bridges, rendering them inoperable but not destroying them."


When will the nightmare of PC kinder gentler compassionate war fighting ever end? Now we don't even want to hurt bridges. Man not only should we be destroying brigdes completely but we should be destroying them INSIDE SYRIA.

Again we are waiting for the enemy to pick the time and place to attack us after they have regrouped refitted and reorganized in their Vietnam/Laos-Cambodia like sanctuary of Syria. Where they enjoy safe haven from our weaponry.

Why Mr. Bush do you allow this to go on? Don't you recognize that the Iraqis know this too. The Iraqi people know that the Americans can't hide from the terrorist but the terrorist can hide in Syria and Iran because apparently, the Americans are afraid to attack Syria and Iran.

Why?

The President should explain the reasons why we are on the defensive waiting to be attacked.

Blast Damascus with some heavy duty shock and awe and see how things turn around. You'll see the stinking Syrians controlling that border like their life depended on it. Right now its our lives that depend on it.

Tagline:
6 posted on 09/06/2005 3:12:49 AM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cap Huff

Exactly....Assad and his henchmen are a wee bit distracted by the UN probe into Hairri(sp)death.


7 posted on 09/06/2005 3:14:53 AM PDT by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

Amusing post!

>...apparently, the Americans are afraid to attack Syria and Iran.

Why?<

Perhaps you'd like to consider the medium-term and long-term consequences of this, for example effects on oil supply and the economy, to name but two.

Relax, US troop losses are minimal, progress is being made on the political front - where it really counts. And military considerations must always be totally subordinate to political ones. Otherwise, all casualties will be in vain. Simple, really.


8 posted on 09/06/2005 3:44:02 AM PDT by ukman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Hope this is a move akin to locking the doors so the punks can't leave.

That will com in handy when the US Army and Marines start b-slapping them around that town of Qaim they call their own now.

9 posted on 09/06/2005 4:45:06 AM PDT by libs_kma (USA: The land of the Free....Because of the Brave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Annan added

Blah, Blah, Blah......There, My Kofi filter is working again.

10 posted on 09/06/2005 4:45:14 AM PDT by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tom Bombadil
Annan, speaking to the British Broadcasting Corp. on Monday, said many young Muslims are angry, and their anger has been exacerbated by what is happening in Iraq.

Too bad there isn't some international organization that could do something to help.

11 posted on 09/06/2005 4:56:39 AM PDT by airborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Nice shooting, Marines.


12 posted on 09/06/2005 5:17:30 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Kofi's right, as much as some people hate to admit it. Attacks in Iraq have occured more frequently and with much more violence and people wounded/killed than in Afghanistan. More foreign fighters are going to fight in Iraq than in Afghanistan. For the insurgent leaders, its easier to convince their fighters to fight against what they perceive as a foreign threat close to their "holy land" than in Afghanistan where there is less to lose.


13 posted on 09/06/2005 5:19:04 AM PDT by socdelt9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ukman
Perhaps you'd like to consider the medium-term and long-term consequences of this, for example effects on oil supply and the economy, to name but two.


Consider this. 1.5 billion dollars every single week. Is that consequential enough for ya. Lets call that one mid term.

Long term is Iran, in that Iran is trying to get into the Nuke Club. And if we stay in Iraq playing Nam redux, we will end up with a Nuclear Iran.

Time is not on our side. We need to take out Syria and Iran. Do that and you'll have plenty of oil, don't and Iran could end up nuking a couple of Persian Gulf neighbors like Kuwait. THAT would cause real oil problems.
14 posted on 09/06/2005 5:28:28 AM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

bump


15 posted on 09/06/2005 5:41:14 AM PDT by Khashayar (No Banana Allowed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

Don't panic, as the government isn't panicking either. It knew the war would cost this much, so it's no big deal. If they hadn't planned to spend that much, the US shouldn't have gone into Iraq in the first place. And war against Iran and/or Syria would be even more expensive! In any case, they're no great threat even if they do get nukes (which they won't for a good few years). Plenty of time to take care of that when it happens.
War against them would NOT mean plenty of oil, but the opposite.

What the US needs to do is get Iran on its side; after all, since the USA needs the Shia in Iraq, making war on Iran would not be very wise at all. The US really needs Iran as an ally, and Syria too for that matter!

As for the 1.5 billion $, I don't mind since I'm not American :-D.


16 posted on 09/06/2005 6:28:26 AM PDT by ukman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tom Bombadil

***Blah, Blah, Blah......There, My Kofi filter is working again.***

Kofi filter. LOVE it.


17 posted on 09/06/2005 6:35:42 AM PDT by kitkat ("We're not going to let anybody frighten us from our great love of freedom." GWB, 7/22/05))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

If we destroyed the bridges, we'd have to rebuild them, something that is a big PITA. Cratering them is just as effective at rendering them useless but costs a lot less to (eventually) repair.


18 posted on 09/06/2005 7:31:06 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC
>"The munitions used in the strike were designed to crater the bridges, rendering them inoperable but not destroying them"
>>When will the nightmare of PC kinder gentler compassionate war fighting ever end? Now we don't even want to hurt bridges

Well, this kind of stuff
lets the military test
our weird munitions

that someday we may
have to use in places like,
well, say, New Orleans . . .

19 posted on 09/06/2005 7:34:57 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: socdelt9
This is exactly what we want to happen. Make Iraq the center front of the war on terror so all the islamic terrorists from all over the islamic world will come to fight us there. It is in Iraq where the terrorists decided to make a stand against us and it is in Iraq where we are annihilating them. The strategy for the war on terror is working very well.
20 posted on 09/06/2005 8:13:49 AM PDT by jveritas (The Axis of Defeatism: Left wing liberals, Buchananites, and third party voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson