This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 08/28/2005 9:46:32 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Locked - New Thread http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1472323/posts |
Posted on 08/27/2005 8:05:55 PM PDT by NautiNurse
Glad you checked in and are OK - thanks for the local update.
A cat four is NOT worse than a cat 5. Whoever said that doesn't know what they are talking about.
Well, that makes no sense. A Category 5 is worse than a Category 4 by every measure.
How far inland would you suggest people who work to provide oil, gas and commerce through the ports live? If memory serves me, Houston also is below sea level. Where should those that work in ports live?
Here are the levee height maps if you can make sense of them. I don't know this area enough to figure them out.
http://www.mvn.usace.army.mil/pao/response/amaps.asp
I was kinda wondering that too. I'm not too familiar with hurricanes - but I wonder if it'd be possible for a hurricane to ramp itself up too quickly before landfall - and therefore be unable to sustain itself?
Anyone out there know?
It means I was only 11 years of age when Camille struck only about 25 miles east of where they now predict this one to make landfall...eye-wise.
August 17, 1969
we were moved into a gym basement in the middle of the night in 100mph plus winds
the next day, my dad picked me up to go the few miles down to the coast for relief work...he was a general contractor...
most folks who lived thru that learned.
the surge and winds were records
what I was saying was, often times the strength at sea is not the strength at landfall. the timing of the eyewall replacement cycle seems to be a factor in that.
Night, Blam.........keep us posted.
That what I an waiting to see to. All models in good agreement, and NHC is excellent in thier forecasting, so I think I will not worry about this one.
The fact that is still hasn't turned north is bad for NO. The 0z tracks shifted enough to make the track over NO less severe as far as flooding goes. Winds, well... that's going to be a problem regardless it seems.
Eyewall replacements typically last ~18 hours, from beginning to end. Considering we are 36-48 hours out... it's possible that we will be in the middle of another as it comes ashore. I'm trying to look for reasons the storm wont be a catastrophe, and the only ones that come to mind are if it manages to find a relatively less populated area. I think 140-150 sustained at landfall is a good bet... ~155-165 possible if it comes in during another ERC.
OK I am laughing.Your right :) got to go to bed-love you much,night.
Not really, but hurricanes do weird things.
Now, it could undergo an eyewall replacement, which would weaken it, but this storm has not been hurt too much by the cycles. It even gained strength with some pretty crappy eye structure today if you can believe that!
ROFL! I have a "Cat 4" too but no pix handy.
Well its official now...Cat 4 ground zero the Big Easy
Liberal/Democrats should NEVER be elected to ANY leadership positions.
What radar loop are you using ? All of the radar sites I go to have it too far out in the gulf to see now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.