Someone, somewhere needs to rethink only suspending Berger's security clearances for 3 years. They need to think about criminal charges for him, and many others.
Posted on 08/14/2005 2:12:36 PM PDT by cgk
*ping*
I agree. If it wasn't for that "football" thing, I fear my head would explode for all the damage done to this country by the Clinton Administration.
Thanks- I had missed this one.
bump to read later
When I see this- Sandy Burger, Able Danger, Goerlick's wall, and the call for a FULL Congressional election-I am forced to realize
it is a sad, sad irony
that Hillary was elected to the NEW YORK Senate.
Can she see Ground Zero from her office?
Can Willie, from his? Is he even looking?
What is it he does in his office, anyway?
On a happier note, I handed out cigars the day Willie was impeached : )
Considering how much they knew in advance, I'd say it was a slap in the face.
Post #255 & 256
Because the entire government is corrupt.
Haven't W and Slick been pretty friendly in the last year?
Daddy Bush has even been on t.v. and overseas with the Slick One. Maybe the fix is in. The Clinton's may still own the stollen FBI Files.
Hillary is in the Senate to protect her husband's record.
It is conflict of interest but who is going to fight her?
The Demorat Party including Deaniacs only act like a bunch of mad dogs when Hillary says "attack W." This is a diversion away from Slick and his Dirty Deeds.
1) Following the Waco debacle, Clinton was unnerved about revelations detailing coordination between US military (under Wesley Clark's command?) and domestic Ops. Thus he ordered Gorelick (a Hillary hire) to create the intelligence "wall".
2) Even prior to Waco, Clinton ordered Gorelick to create the intelligence "wall" in order to obfuscate potential investigation into his "Chinagate" dealings.
It sure seems as though the 9-11 Commission had been manipulated so as to steer far clear of "the wall" -- which is probably the most significant root cause of our lack of successfully preventing the 9-11 attack. Therefore, the Democrats installed Gorelick on the committee and Berger purged national archive files as necessary to hide their culpability. Given the the public already perceives the democrats as weak on national security, such a revelation would practically cripple them (especially had it been revealed during the 2004 election year.
Do you think either of these theories is likely?
PS: I got a laugh from ex-SOD Cohen's interview on the Sunday talk circuit today, where he ended up pleading the "Sergeant Shultz" defense to Able Danger and their findings. A man of his stature should have done much better than "I don't recall...".
Why is it I'm thinking Sandy's papers were wet before he got out of the building and got them out of his pants.
Seems to be a common misnomer around here that he has already been sentenced. He has not, to my knowledge. Sentencing was delayed until September, was it not?
The rest of your theories will probably only come out in the conservative press, and in the blogosphere, of course.
John / Billybob
well said - thank you
If this is all as it seems:
A slap in the face just doesn't quite describe it.
But I don't think I should describe what I would call it, here.
I wonder if any New Yorkers are connecting the dots.
I wonder how many will die in attempts to keep this covered.
I wonder if there are any photos of Hillary & Willie on the morning of 9/11/01.
Come to think of it, I don't remember hearing or seeing a whole lot from the New York Senator that day, or in the days that followed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.