Posted on 08/12/2005 12:19:36 PM PDT by backhoe
Richard Clarke's Pentagon Papers/VVAW Connection (starting Post 44)
A few with stuff on Gorelick:
Lawmakers Say Misstatements Cloud F.B.I. Chief's Credibility (Post 60)
"John Deutch was an undesecretary in President Carter's Energy Department and a member of the Nuclear Safety Oversight Committee from 1979-1980. During his time there, Jamie Gorelick acted as his legal counsel."
GORELICK-GATE SCANDAL -- Former Clinton Justice Official Fingered As Culprit For 9/11 Botch-up!
1996: Clinton Considered Jamie Gorelick for CIA Director
Did Gorelick's infamous memo provide the missing link between Chinagate and 9/11?
FReeper Research: GORELICK WORKED WITH RICHARD CLARKE! (HHS website transcript)
http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/Printable.asp?ID=13516
9/11 Commission's Staff Ignored Military's Early Identification of Chief Hijacker
NYTIMES ^ | 08/11/05 | DOUGLAS JEHL and PHILIP SHENON
9/11 Commission Wants Atta Claims Pursued
Associated Press/AP Online ^ | Wednesday, 10 August 2005, 18:00 CDT | John J. Lumpkin
THE 9/11 COMMISSION IN MORTAL DANGER
The Corner on National Review Online ^ | 08/11/05 | John Podhoretz
Sandy Berger "TROUSER-GATE" links:
various | August 10, 2005 | Various
Congressman: U.S. Intel Knew 9/11 Plotters
New York Post ^ | August 9, 2005 | Kimberly Hefling
I don't believe there was any mention of this:
Osama met with Saddam in Iraq.
March 23, 2002. The Times of India
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/746741/posts
September 11 Victims Sue Iraq.
September 4, 2002. BBC.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2237332.stm
Spain links 9/11 suspect to Baghdad.
March 16, 2003. The Observer.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,915142,00.html
A judge sees the documents linking OBL and Saddam.
June 25, 2003. The Tennessean.
http://tennessean.com/nation-world/archives/03/06/34908297.shtml?Element_ID=34908297
Memo shows Iraq And Saddam Contacted OBL.
September 12, 2003. The Washington Times.
http://www.washtimes.com/world/20030912-012437-3992r.htm
Iraq and terrorism - no doubt about it. Specific names of Al Qaeda terrorists working in and with Iraq
September 19, 2003. National Review.
http://www.nationalreview.com/robbins/robbins091903.asp
Mohammed's Account links Iraq to 9/11 and first WTC attack:
September 22, 2003. Newsweek.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/987075/posts
Osama's Best Friend: The Further Connections Between Al Qaeda and Saddam.
November 3, 2003. The Weekly Standard
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1007969/posts
Less than two months before 9/11/01, the state-controlled Iraqi newspaper “Al-Nasiriya” carried a column headlined, “American, an Obsession called Osama Bin Ladin.” (July 21, 2001)
In the piece, Baath Party writer Naeem Abd Muhalhal predicted that bin Laden would attack the US “with the seriousness of the Bedouin of the desert about the way he will try to bomb the Pentagon after he destroys the White House.”
The same state-approved column also insisted that bin Laden “will strike America on the arm that is already hurting,” and that the US “will curse the memory of Frank Sinatra every time he hears his songs” – an apparent reference to the Sinatra classic, “New York, New York”.
March 28, 2004, NewsMax
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1106657/posts?page=1
There are hundreds more of these that were not in the 9/11 Commission Report.
This, for one thing:
[VANITY] Help find the Jan 10th edition of New York Magazine cover (Able Danger coverup)
The Gunny Is Starting To Freak Out -- On April 19, 2004, I published a column on Men's News Daily saying the 9-11 Commission would fail for a multitude of reasons, one of which was a blatant conflict of interest regarding commission member and rabid Clintonista Jamie Gorelick
9/11 Commission Transcript: U. S. Attorney General John Ashcroft - Wednesday, April 14, 2004
U.S. knew of al Qaeda cell before 9/11 -- “Able Danger,” identified a terrorist cell based in Brooklyn, NY
WELDON'S SPECIAL ORDER ON "ABLE DANGER" ~~ The truth behind Sept 11, 2001..... -- I love the liberal bumper sticker that says, "when clinton lied no one died". I just say to them-- oh, what about the 3000+ on 9/11 now I can really rub it in.. More of the BJs legacy.
'POST-IT' BLUNDER -- Wasn't it Jamie Gorelick that implemented the policy that intellegence can't tell the FBI about stuff? And wasn't this just about the time that Charlie Tree was funneling money into the Clinton coffers?
Four in 9/11 Plot Are Called Tied to Qaeda in '00 -- This article is MUST reading. There is a ton of highly classified stuff in this report, which I think cuts closer to reality than most "for public consumption" stuff the sheeple are fed. Particulary note the importance of "data mining"--
Ramzi Yousef (1993 WTC) and Terry Nichols (OKC) crossed paths in the Phillipines. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (9/11)was Yousef's uncle. It is interesting to note that Yousef entered the United States on an Iraqi passport and had been known among the New York fundamentalists as "Rashid, the Iraqi". Another name that could be thrown into the mix is Abdul Rahman Yasin, a U.S. citizen who moved to Iraq in the 1960's and returned to the U.S. in 1992. After the 1993 WTC bombing, Yasin fled to Iraq and was given monthly salary and housing by Saddam Hussein's regime.
Gorelick and OKC:
Oklahoma City, TWA Flight 800, and the Gorelick connection
See also:
Gorelick's Memo Impeded Probe of Clinton's China Scandal
Oklahoma City, TWA Flight 800, and the Gorelick connection
9/11 Widows 'Horrified' at Intelligence Blunder
Millennial Mistake Jamie Gorelick’s dangerous “wall of separation.” -- The truth about what went on before 9/11 is bound to have the average voter connecting the dots from Gorelick and Sandy Burglar to Clinton. (Bad news for Hill, who plans to run on Bill's record.)
Don't miss the latest from today's New York Times:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1461035/posts
What Gorelick Wants
FrontPageMagazine.com
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13579
| 6/02/04 | Jonathan M. Stein
Discussion thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1146047/posts?page=4
We need an independent prosecutor. I understand that Ken Starr is looking for work...
-----
And he would be just the man go nail Clinton, and his "mafia minions"...Gorellick and Reno should be at the top of the list. Also primary, is the exposure of the 9/11 commission for what it was -- A SHAM UPON THE AMERICAN PUBLIC TO HIDE what we knew AND WHO KNEW IT which could have most likely prevented 9/11 from occurring.
Heads should roll big time in this -- otherwise the credibility of the American government is toast...
I'm honored- thank you!
Did you just volunteer? ;-)
bump
Backhoe, you have outdone yourself once again! Outstanding post. Thanks for your efforts.
as Rush was saying today, and he was clear about it - both parties function to protect the political class in this country, to see to it that no matter what happens, no one in the political class is blamed.
that's why you don't see any of the top leaders on our side calling for a full investigation. it should have been obvious that 9-11, happening just 7 months after Clinton left office, meant that somewhere, someplace, during his 8 years stewardship of this nations military, intelligence, and DOJ apparatus - that this information was known. and now we know it.
Jamie Gorelick was effectively THE Attorney General during most of this period, as Janet Reno was in a state of virtual paralysis, unable to make so much as a declarative sentence, without falling back on some obscure reason that she 'could not comment on that'.
And Jamie Gorelick was the MOST instrumental in keeping this information compartmentalized and bottled up, both during her tenure in office, and on the 9/11 Commission. Nobody seemed to question her presence on that panel, or that she seemed not to be willing to volunteer information about whatever position she held with the regime of the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001".
"Lame" takes on a whole new definition and dimension.
I know why. God had sent the regime of the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001" as a sort of Old Testament test of the right of mankind to justify itself in the sight of God. Had we failed, we would have suffered the fate of Sodom and Gomorrah. As it was, only a couple small licks of flame were sent against New York City and the Pentagon. From time to time, a couple more flickers have occurred in Madrid and London, and possibly Sharm El Sheikh.
Does anybody really doubt divine intervention in averting a much wider disaster?
I cannot quarrel with a word you wrote. We should count our blessings.
We can pretty well figure IT WASN'T the same thing Al Gore had stuffed in his.
Thank you- I do appreciate your encouraging words.
Why is NONE of this on the news, not even Fox News? Perhaps they need a bit more encouragement, I am tired of sensationalism as a constant theme. The 9-11 story posted here is far more important in my life then Aruba.
New York SLIME lets here the spin on this one.
Lee Hamilton is already preparing the cover-up. I've watched him a couple of times today and he appears to be treading water waiting for the cover-up boat to arrive.
they only care about ratings - nothing else. they will cover this stupid Aruba case until they see the ratings fall off, then they will dump that story. in the meantime, real stories get totally pushed off the air.
and where is Tom Kean?
uhhh, you've confused me. I don't mind getting pinged to this, I'm just trying to figure out why I was and what you're talking about. Could you be a bit more clear? I'm completely confused
Here is something to keep a watch for ... if the faux commission rejected the Able Danger information since it put Atta in the US prior to when Immigration pegged Atta's visa entry, then Atta must have been in the country illegally ergo the statement that the Army couldn't share the data since Atta was in the country on a visa was incorrect and by the commission's own reasoning, Atta would have been in NY illegally and information sharing was fair game!
...it should have been obvious that 9-11, happening just 7 months after Clinton left office, meant that somewhere, someplace, during his 8 years stewardship of this nations military, intelligence, and DOJ apparatus - that this information was known. and now we know it...
-----
I would agree with Rush, we have criminals protecting criminals. Clinton should swing for the last and final time for this. And the list of accomplices is long...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.