Posted on 08/12/2005 12:19:36 PM PDT by backhoe
We need an independent prosecutor. I understand that Ken Starr is looking for work...
-----
And he would be just the man go nail Clinton, and his "mafia minions"...Gorellick and Reno should be at the top of the list. Also primary, is the exposure of the 9/11 commission for what it was -- A SHAM UPON THE AMERICAN PUBLIC TO HIDE what we knew AND WHO KNEW IT which could have most likely prevented 9/11 from occurring.
Heads should roll big time in this -- otherwise the credibility of the American government is toast...
I'm honored- thank you!
Did you just volunteer? ;-)
bump
Backhoe, you have outdone yourself once again! Outstanding post. Thanks for your efforts.
as Rush was saying today, and he was clear about it - both parties function to protect the political class in this country, to see to it that no matter what happens, no one in the political class is blamed.
that's why you don't see any of the top leaders on our side calling for a full investigation. it should have been obvious that 9-11, happening just 7 months after Clinton left office, meant that somewhere, someplace, during his 8 years stewardship of this nations military, intelligence, and DOJ apparatus - that this information was known. and now we know it.
Jamie Gorelick was effectively THE Attorney General during most of this period, as Janet Reno was in a state of virtual paralysis, unable to make so much as a declarative sentence, without falling back on some obscure reason that she 'could not comment on that'.
And Jamie Gorelick was the MOST instrumental in keeping this information compartmentalized and bottled up, both during her tenure in office, and on the 9/11 Commission. Nobody seemed to question her presence on that panel, or that she seemed not to be willing to volunteer information about whatever position she held with the regime of the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001".
"Lame" takes on a whole new definition and dimension.
I know why. God had sent the regime of the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001" as a sort of Old Testament test of the right of mankind to justify itself in the sight of God. Had we failed, we would have suffered the fate of Sodom and Gomorrah. As it was, only a couple small licks of flame were sent against New York City and the Pentagon. From time to time, a couple more flickers have occurred in Madrid and London, and possibly Sharm El Sheikh.
Does anybody really doubt divine intervention in averting a much wider disaster?
I cannot quarrel with a word you wrote. We should count our blessings.
We can pretty well figure IT WASN'T the same thing Al Gore had stuffed in his.
Thank you- I do appreciate your encouraging words.
Why is NONE of this on the news, not even Fox News? Perhaps they need a bit more encouragement, I am tired of sensationalism as a constant theme. The 9-11 story posted here is far more important in my life then Aruba.
New York SLIME lets here the spin on this one.
Lee Hamilton is already preparing the cover-up. I've watched him a couple of times today and he appears to be treading water waiting for the cover-up boat to arrive.
they only care about ratings - nothing else. they will cover this stupid Aruba case until they see the ratings fall off, then they will dump that story. in the meantime, real stories get totally pushed off the air.
and where is Tom Kean?
uhhh, you've confused me. I don't mind getting pinged to this, I'm just trying to figure out why I was and what you're talking about. Could you be a bit more clear? I'm completely confused
Here is something to keep a watch for ... if the faux commission rejected the Able Danger information since it put Atta in the US prior to when Immigration pegged Atta's visa entry, then Atta must have been in the country illegally ergo the statement that the Army couldn't share the data since Atta was in the country on a visa was incorrect and by the commission's own reasoning, Atta would have been in NY illegally and information sharing was fair game!
...it should have been obvious that 9-11, happening just 7 months after Clinton left office, meant that somewhere, someplace, during his 8 years stewardship of this nations military, intelligence, and DOJ apparatus - that this information was known. and now we know it...
-----
I would agree with Rush, we have criminals protecting criminals. Clinton should swing for the last and final time for this. And the list of accomplices is long...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.