Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boxer demands Roberts support abortion, privacy
AP ^ | 8-10-05 | DAVID KRAVETS

Posted on 08/10/2005 5:51:04 PM PDT by Indy Pendance

Sen. Barbara Boxer said Wednesday she would vote against John Roberts' nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court, if she remains convinced he doesn't support abortion and privacy rights.

"I need to know exactly where he stands and I need to know whether he would fight to protect the rights and freedoms of the American people," said Boxer, D-Calif. "If I don't believe he will, I won't vote for him."

Boxer said she was withholding judgment on whether she would vote for President Bush's pick to succeed Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who often provided the decisive swing vote in decisions that spit the court's liberal and conservative wings.

"Imagine what is riding on this one Supreme Court vacancy," Boxer told an audience of about 200 at Golden Gate School of Law. "This one vote means so much to countless women."

Boxer fears a more conservative court could lead "to the days of back alley illegal abortions."

"We cannot go back to those dark days," she said. "Judge Roberts cannot duck this issue."

Roberts has been on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit since June 2003. He was associate counsel to President Reagan from 1982-86 and then served in the first Bush administration, arguing cases before the Supreme Court from 1989-93.

Boxer said filibustering Roberts is an option.

"I have the ultimate step. I can withhold my approval. I can use all the parliamentary rules I have as a senator to stand up and fight for you," she said.

Included in her criteria for supporting Roberts is his taking a strong stand on the right to privacy, which Roberts called a "so-called" right while working as a government attorney.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 109th; abortion; boxer; johnroberts; privacy; proaborts; radicalfeminists; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: Indy Pendance
Boxer fears a more conservative court could lead "to the days of back alley illegal abortions.

So... If we cant stop bank robberies, we should legalize them???

41 posted on 08/10/2005 6:20:51 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

"What is it with this obsession with abortion?"

What is it with the obsession of saying they are pro-choice and the right is pro life?

Everyone is pro-choice. We choose life and they choose death.

That's the talking point we need to get across to the nation.



42 posted on 08/10/2005 6:22:30 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Liberal Talking Point - Bush = Hitler ... Republican Talking Point - Let the Liberals Talk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
"I need to know exactly where he stands and I need to know whether he would fight to protect the rights and freedoms of the American people," said Boxer, D-Calif. "If I don't believe he will, I won't vote for him."

Babs is so lame. Judges don't "fight." They arrive at conclusions, interpret, apply logic and reasoning, etc., but they don't fight. Now, politicians on the other hand.... :)

43 posted on 08/10/2005 6:22:36 PM PDT by upchuck ("If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alnick

"Oh good grief, Babs. Everyone knows you'll never vote for him, so just shut up and get out of the way."

She panders to her base like no other


44 posted on 08/10/2005 6:23:38 PM PDT by commonasdirt (Reading DU so you won't hafta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

It seems Robers is going to pass so the looney left is going to milk this for MONEY as much as they can.


45 posted on 08/10/2005 6:24:54 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
"Jeez ... Barbara Boxer breathes air ... I breathe air ... there must be something wrong with me!"

ROFL

46 posted on 08/10/2005 6:24:54 PM PDT by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: alnick

"Everyone knows you'll never vote for him, so just shut up and get out of the way".

1 B*tch... 1 Vote ;-)

She really thinks people outside of marxland take her seriously?!

LLS


47 posted on 08/10/2005 6:29:34 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Boxer is not a well person. She's speaking like some street-bully, not like a US Congressperson. I wonder if she actually listens to her sound bites?

And we ask the Afghanis and the Iraqis look at the USofA and see how demoncracy works?





A box of rocks would be better than a Boxer with rocks for brains.
48 posted on 08/10/2005 6:32:44 PM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (It translates as "72 raisins of startling white clarity" NOT 72 fair skinned maidens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: commonasdirt

She reads DU, and basks in their praise for "standing up for us".

As many posters have said, like she was going to vote for Roberts confirmation anyway! Why, what a brave little demorat warrior she is!


49 posted on 08/10/2005 6:36:06 PM PDT by Theresawithanh (As long as Dean's the head of the D-N-C, it just looks better for the G-O-P!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes; Indy Pendance
Evidently they can't think that far beyond the next election because that is exactly what they are doing.

At this rate, eventually there won't be a next election for them.

Remember, this is why they are so adamant about extending voting rights to convicted murderers and rapists, illegal aliens and convicted drug dealers. They want to outlaw positive identification at the polling place to facilitate their frauds.

50 posted on 08/10/2005 6:36:37 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Boxer is such a hypocrite! I wish she would ABORT herself and NOT an innocent defenseless infant!
51 posted on 08/10/2005 6:40:09 PM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

Boxershorts and her entire cult-of-death can just bite-it.


52 posted on 08/10/2005 6:42:54 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (fiat voluntas Tua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
Shouldn't this be a barf alert? I see that Senator Box Shorts is keen on privacy but not on human life.
53 posted on 08/10/2005 6:44:13 PM PDT by topher (God bless our troops and protect them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

Boxer is in the title, that qualifies.


54 posted on 08/10/2005 6:44:59 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77

She's an evil munchkin. A Lollipop Guild reject, even the flying monkeys wouldn't let her in.


55 posted on 08/10/2005 6:45:59 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (fiat voluntas Tua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
You'd think they'd be worried about killing off future liberals

They don't even realize they HAVE.

56 posted on 08/10/2005 6:47:31 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (fiat voluntas Tua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance


Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., stands by a display of abortion headlines while discussing the upcoming confirmation hearings of John Roberts to the Supreme Court, during a news conference in San Francisco, Wednesday Aug. 10, 2005. Sen. Boxer said that she would vote against John Roberts, President Bush's nominee to the Supreme Court, if she is not convinced he supports abortion and other rights. 'Imagine what is riding on this one Supreme Court vacancy,' the Democrat from California said. 'This one votemeans so much to countless women.'(AP Photo/Eric Risberg)
57 posted on 08/10/2005 6:49:16 PM PDT by maggief (No 'luffs')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PilloryHillary

It's a hideous commentary on humanity when millions of people wake up each morning utterly DRIVEN to do everything within their power, by any means necessary, to preserve the ability (I refuse to call it a right) to slaughter unborn children. They are totally consumed by the issue, distraught at the notion that these babies might be protected and given a chance to live. It's a wonder God hasn't just swatted us out of existence.

MM


58 posted on 08/10/2005 6:50:19 PM PDT by MississippiMan (Americans should not be sacrificed on the altar of political correctness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wolf24
"I'm so conFUSED!"


59 posted on 08/10/2005 6:54:11 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (fiat voluntas Tua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

Lindsey Graham said it best. Pay no attention to the fringe..the Boxers and the Schumers. Look at the dems on the gang of 14. Any other Dem is irrelevant.


60 posted on 08/10/2005 6:55:24 PM PDT by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson