Posted on 07/30/2005 8:59:55 AM PDT by Borax Queen
Pronunciation: 'tree-zun Function: noun Etymology: Middle English tresoun, from Old French traison, from Latin tradition-, traditio act of handing over, from tradere to hand over, betray -- more at TRAITOR 1 : the betrayal of a trust : TREACHERY 2 : the offense of attempting by overt acts to overthrow the government of the state to which the offender owes allegiance or to kill or personally injure the sovereign or the sovereign's family
---
It's an especially sickening and orchestrated plan that is selling out our nation's sovereignty, perpetrated by a cabal of globalists and the big business money men who own our elected officials and, by default, our non-elected officials.
There are several points to the overall plan that would combine the nations of Mexico, the United States and Canada, eliminating the middle class in the US and placing most citizens of all three nations at the same lower living standard while those who own most everything take even more.
Elements of the plan can be seen working separately toward the same goal:
... Allow the flow of illegals to continue unabated.
... Step up the rhetoric about "immigration reform" while stalling its implementation.
... Portray elements and groups in America against illegal immigration as "extreme," "unpatriotic" and "racist."
... Stall enforcement of laws regarding illegal immigration.
... Apply stricter enforcement against legal immigration regards the new "undesirables" in Africa, Asia and Europe.
... Use language concerning "immigration reform" to mask the goal of an outright amnesty for those from south of our border.
... Portray any possible attempt to secure the US border with Mexico as "futile."
... Pass legislation for "free trade" that allows even more illegal immigration and that destroys domestic business and erodes middle class influence.
In fact, it's even broader and worse than the above examples. The president and other elected officials have attempted to paint those trying to stop illegal immigration as "vigilantes" and criminals. Every arm of government, federal, state and even local, has attempted to strong-arm patriots in favor of "oppressed immigrants."
Actually. if you pay attention to current events, you can see that the day is not far off in the future when, after threats of physical violence to patriots attempting to guard the border, by pro-illegal immigration advocates, we will experience an armed confrontation in which several will be killed.
Any bets as to with whom the American federal government will side?
But why? Why would our elected representatives do this in the face of obvious threats to our national security and our economy – especially in the wake of the 911 attacks?
That's easy... the elected representatives do not represent American citizens. They represent the entities that own them in the corporations and, in some cases, higher up, the groups that actually run our country.
This is why the effort to secure our border appears to be "futile" and the government seems "unable" to stop it.
It's all being done by design...
For cheap labor for corporate donors: Big business has enjoyed several years of unabated watering-down of wages and benefits due, mostly, to illegals coming into the United States to "pick fruit." The illegals are also "doing the jobs Americans won't do." These are the jobs that Americans can't do because corporations enjoy hiring the illegal aliens illegally over American citizens in order to pay less wages and benefits.
For additional votes: Obviously illegals, once registered to vote, can vote for the party that helps get more illegals into the United States (both parties in this case), so that they can go to work for the corporations for less wages and benefits.
In order to meld the nations of America, Mexico and Canada into one big country: So that all workers inside the three nations can work for the corporations for less wages and benefits.
This is really the bottom line of the whole enterprise: Money. The individuals selling-out our nation's sovereignty — both elected and influential — are only concerned about this one item. And they aren't keen on the idea of letting something like our country's Constitution get in the way of their profits.
If there is another terror attack, so much the better for those implementing this enterprise. Nothing goes together with creating a two-class, welfare-warfare socialist police state better than the further elimination of individual rights.
The icing on the cake for the globalists inside, behind and in control of the Bush Administration and our other elected officials, is the fact that, regards terrorism, the American people are even asking for further state controls.
The CAFTA agreement, narrowly passed last week, is one aspect of the overall plan to begin eliminating our borders, while watering-down the standard of living for the disappearing middle class. Another aspect is the agreement already reached without public exposure, debate or consideration for the US Constitution.
I refer, of course, to The Council on Foreign Relations plan called "Building a North American Community."
That's the agreement President George W. Bush was signing on to when he was at his ranch in Crawford Texas with Mexico's El Presidente Vincente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin back in March — the same meeting Bush was at when he referred to the Minuteman patriots as "vigilantes." And... it's the plan behind the other actions, inactions, potential bills and agreements the Bush Administration is involved in regarding illegal immigration.
A thorough reading of this document — already being implemented without the knowledge (for the most part) or consent of the American people, but also WITH the tacit approval of their elected representatives — spells out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."
"Community" means integrating the United States with the corruption, socialism, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada. "Common perimeter" means wide-open US borders between the US, Mexico and Canada.
Here are just a few of the jewels in the document:
... Employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No more "illegal aliens" at all; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of US wages.
... Mexican trucks are allowed "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between US cities.
... A "tested once" principle for pharmaceuticals, by which a product tested in Mexico will automatically be considered to have met US standards.
... The implementation of "the Social Security Totalization Agreement negotiated between the United States and Mexico." This will put illegal aliens into the US Social Security system.
... US taxpayers are required to create a major fund to finance 60,000 Mexican students to study in US colleges.
There is much more to the document. But with this agreement, CAFTA and the attitude regarding illegal aliens and border security by the Bush Administration and our elected representatives, it's easy to see that the elements are all in place for implementation.
Except for one more small detail...
The selling of our national sovereignty and the implementation of a two-class, welfare-warfare socialist police state also needs... an effective PR campaign.
Not to worry... that's being taken care of as well.
Already we are, once again, hearing that Bush "wants an immigration reform package" by the fall. The package he wants is the same one he's been pushing for several years and, especially, since his reelection: An amnesty bill disguised as a "guest-worker" program.
Only this time Bush plans an all-out pro-illegal immigration propaganda campaign to accompany the bill. In this campaign illegal aliens will be portrayed as "victims" of American "racists." The Statue of Liberty and patriotic music will permeate the commercials.
Bush and other conspirators in our government hope this campaign will lead to passage of the amnesty bill. Another sell-out of our national sovereignty, aimed at creating a "border-less North America" by 2010.
It's never really made sense, has it? The fact that we can pave and maintain thousands of miles of Interstate highway but... we "cannot secure our southern border." The fact that we can invade, occupy and "rebuild" a foreign nation but... we are "helpless to stop the invasion of millions of illegal aliens" into our own country. The fact that we can document and tax 300 million American citizens but... we "cannot locate or expel illegal aliens" from our country.
It doesn't make sense.
But President Bush, The Council on Foreign Relations and our other bribe-taking elected officials want you to believe their nonsense anyway.
For that matter... one has to wonder if our best and brightest and most able aren't in Iraq to keep them busy while this treasonous plan is implemented.
Nobody wants to believe that their president, senators and other elected officials might be traitors to The United States of America and its Constitution. But, by definition...
That's exactly what they are.
Illegal imigration may be a problem of note, but not anywhere as serious as drug use and abortion right here among US born citizens.
The article made sense until I got to this, which I would appreciate if someone here could explain:
The reference is to a Los Angeles Times story on the upcoming public relations campaign by the administration to "sell" the immigration reform package Bush wants and "marginalize" the opposition (i.e., Minutemen). The campaign is being put together by ex-congress guy Dick Armey and some other guy.
The story claims that the campaign will charge a fee from support groups. Those being recruited come from business and Hispanic organizations.
The link, sadly, cannot be accessed directly without registration. But, here it is anyway: Immigration Rising on Bush's To-Do List
But that is NOT the legal definition in the United States, and the definition given in the Constitution is!
Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
Article. III. Section 3 Constitution for the United States.
Hmmm. Interesting. Seems the Constitution's definition may apply as well.
"It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodeter- mination practiced in past centuries."
-----
Sounds like something out of a cheap, poorly written, novel on treason and sedition.
I believe I hear the fat lady singing!
Boy are YOU deluded... Why not a massive email hissy fit.?.
Principle?... Boy the powers that be are so far ahead of YOU they've looped you on the track..
i.e Hillary(and Bill Clinton) are running in 2008. Al Gore or John whatshisname would even be better than Hillary and Bill.. maybe 5 patriotic republicans Might withhold their vote.. NAH.. you're all alone dude..
You do know, the invasion at the border is on purpose don't you.?.
Its no accident.. The american people will do NOTHING and they know it.. Even here on FR Hillary trumps the illegal invasion.. Boy are them dudes smart.. WHO?.. dunno.. But the faux competition between the demos and pubbies seems well orchestrated.. and most even here buy it..
Thanks for the ping, Gubamyster. The destruction of our national sovereignty is a tragedy in the making.
Actually, our whole political system seems like something out of a cheap, poorly written, novel on treason and sedition.
Our judicial system is a dark comedy.
Amen.
BTTT
:)
Ping
I've recently "invited" newspeople to mention the CFR, etc., but they just sneer at me. Being part of the problem and not the solution and all, it must be hard for them to hear a peasant speak of such things...
Maybe I'm clarifying unnecessarily, but I'm not saying citizens don't exist.
I'm saying State Citizens exist. "United State citizen" is NOWHERE to be found in the Federalist Papers, the Constitution, or anything else I've read.
"United State citizen", is in fact, an artificial 'person' specifically constructed to *trick* us into the jurisdiction of the federal government. __________________________________________________
as illegals by definition have no passport which has been approved for entry to USA they cannot claim rights as citizens..
Nowhere does it say you MUST be a 'citizen' of any kind. The only reason to become one is to have the right to vote or run for an elected position.
You can be a resident WITHOUT being a 'citizen'....
In fact, you cannot have 'inalienable' rights and extend them only to citizens. If we are 'all created equal and endowed by our Creator with inalienable rights, they must, by that very definition extend to everyone.
___________________________________________________
I assumed you were trying to show that Illegals have same rights/ more rights -than citizens.
Exactly! Because they are NOT "United State citizens", they have all the rights we are SUPPOSED to have, but don't!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.