Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radio Address by the Presidient to the Nation, 07-16-05
WhiteHouse.gove ^ | 07-16-05 | George W. Bush

Posted on 07/16/2005 8:44:05 AM PDT by Salvation


White House Radio Front Page White House Radio Front Page White House Radio Front Page

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
July 16, 2005

President's Radio Address

     listenAudio
     Fact sheeten Español

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Under the Constitution, I have the responsibility to nominate a successor to Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. This past week I met with Democratic and Republican leaders in the United States Senate and sought their views on the process, and their thoughts on the qualities to look for in a potential nominee. Also, my staff has talked with more than 60 members of the United States Senate. Members of the Senate are receiving a full opportunity to provide their opinions and recommendations, and I appreciate their advice.

White House Radio Archives
 Radio Address
 Radio Interviews
I will be guided by clear principles as I make my decision. My nominee will be a fair-minded individual who represents the mainstream of American law and American values. The nominee will meet the highest standards of intellect, character, and ability, and will pledge to faithfully interpret the Constitution and laws of our country. Our nation deserves, and I will select, a Supreme Court justice that Americans can be proud of.

The American people also expect a Senate confirmation process that rises above partisanship. When I met with Senate leaders, we discussed our shared goal of making sure that the confirmation process is dignified. The nominee deserves fair treatment, a fair hearing, and a fair vote. I will make my nomination in a timely manner so the nominee can be confirmed before the start of the Court's new term in October.

The experiences of the two justices nominated by President Clinton provide useful examples of fair treatment and a reasonable timetable for Senate action. In 1993, the Senate voted on and confirmed Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the Supreme Court 42 days after President Clinton submitted her nomination. And despite the significant philosophical differences many senators had with Justice Ginsburg, she received 96 votes in favor of confirmation.

The following year, Justice Stephen Breyer was confirmed 73 days after his nomination was submitted, with 87 votes in his favor. Again, Republican senators in large numbers voted for confirmation of Justice Breyer despite significant philosophical differences. These examples show that the thorough consideration of a nominee does not require months of delay.

As we continue the process to fill the opening on the Supreme Court, we are also moving forward on other important priorities for the American people. This past week, we received more good news on the economy. The 2005 deficit is projected to be $94 billion less than previously expected. I told the Congress and the country we would cut the deficit in half by 2009. This week's numbers show that we are ahead of pace, so long as Congress acts wisely with taxpayer dollars.

This good news on the budget is coupled with other news that shows the economy is strong and getting stronger. Our economy is growing faster than any other major industrialized nation. The unemployment rate is down to 5 percent, lower than the average rate of the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. We have created more than 2 million jobs in the past 12 months. More Americans are working today than ever before in our nation's history, and home ownership in America is at an all-time high.

To keep our economy growing and creating jobs, Congress needs to continue working in the upcoming weeks on our pro-growth economic agenda. First, for the sake of our economic security and our national security, the Congress must complete its work on a good energy bill that will reduce our dependence on foreign sources of energy.

Second, the House needs to follow the Senate's lead by approving the Central American and Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement. By lowering trade barriers for our exports, this agreement will level the playing field for America's goods, services and crops, and help create jobs for American workers.

Third, Congress needs to send me a fiscally responsible highway bill that modernizes roads and bridges, improves safety and opens up new job opportunities.

Finally, Congress needs to move forward with Social Security reform. For those of you who were born before 1950, Social Security will not change. But the system has made promises to our younger workers that it cannot pay for. And the cost of fixing the system grows higher with every year we wait. So Congress needs to act now to strengthen Social Security for our children and grandchildren.

The American people expect members of both parties to offer a positive agenda and get things done for our country. By working together in the weeks ahead, I am confident we will achieve positive results for all Americans.

Thank you for listening.



TOPICS: Announcements; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: breyer; bush43; cafta; conservative; constitution; economy; ginsburg; highways; house; judges; judicialnominees; lessdeficit; radioaddress; replace; sandradayoconnor; scotus; senate; supremecourt; transcript
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: All
Bush Drops Hints on Supreme Court Choice
21 posted on 07/16/2005 10:18:05 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

"Do their names go on a "Do Not Enter the U. S. list?"

What would that matter when they are illegally entering through the Mexican border at a rate of 5000 per day?


22 posted on 07/16/2005 10:26:03 AM PDT by panaxanax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; Pirate21

The American mainstream IS conservative, and the President knows it.


23 posted on 07/16/2005 10:34:40 AM PDT by ohioWfan ("If My people, which are called by My name, will humble themselves and pray.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

Thank you. Man some people here are so negative. Damn.


24 posted on 07/16/2005 10:54:46 AM PDT by hotsteppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: John Robertson
...a signal that, we approved yours, now you approve ours...will NOT work with the Democrats ...

I feel more than confident that the President knows this will NOT work with the "other side." He was NOT addressing the ant-American/socialist/communist members of the SINate.

His signal was to us, the voters, the constituents of the absolute moronic idiots in the SINate, to motivate "we the people" to start bombarding the SINators with OUR opinions and not just leave it up to the Daily KOS, moveon.org, cpusa, DU, Soros crowd.

25 posted on 07/16/2005 11:23:20 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (I - LOVE - my attitude problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hotsteppa
That's the way they like to live their lives, hotsteppa..........negative about everything, overreacting to anything.

It's best to ignore them and simply speak the truth.

26 posted on 07/16/2005 11:23:36 AM PDT by ohioWfan ("If My people, which are called by My name, will humble themselves and pray.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
My nominee will be a fair-minded individual who represents the mainstream of American law and American values.

What happened to strict constructionist?

27 posted on 07/16/2005 2:44:00 PM PDT by itsahoot (Reagan promised to abolish the Dept of Education and the 55 mph Limit. Which was least important?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pirate21
I believe that President Bush is saying he will nominate someone who will faithfully interpret our Constitution.

That may well be you belief, but it is not what he said. He said it plain enough before a vacancy, he should have no trouble making it crystal clear now.

Scalia and Thomas are hardly mainstream, but they are certainly strict costitutionalist.

28 posted on 07/16/2005 2:49:34 PM PDT by itsahoot (Reagan promised to abolish the Dept of Education and the 55 mph Limit. Which was least important?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
If more FReepers would occasionally rip him a new one when he steps in it up to his knees perhaps some political analyists in the WH might suggest a few policy changes that would be beneficial to America instead of China and Mexico.

Bingo, bump

29 posted on 07/16/2005 2:51:05 PM PDT by itsahoot (Reagan promised to abolish the Dept of Education and the 55 mph Limit. Which was least important?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch; admin
I hope that you and all the members of your family lose your jobs to illegal aliens before the next election.

Thanks for your, oh so kind, wishes. People such as you are a disgrace to FreeRepublic. Go back to the DU.
30 posted on 07/16/2005 3:01:25 PM PDT by Pirate21 (When in the course of human events... ...are we going to get fightin' mad?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hotsteppa

Yes, negativity seems to be the theme. My interpretation of the speech is just the opposite...but to some... the sky is always "falling"


31 posted on 07/16/2005 5:45:58 PM PDT by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: Salvation
Second, the House needs to follow the Senate's lead by approving the Central American and Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement.

How 'bout NO?

33 posted on 07/16/2005 6:11:30 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan

**American mainstream IS conservative,**

This is my judgment too, the lamestream media, ABCNNBCBS has not heard the news!


34 posted on 07/16/2005 9:01:32 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Or is the "new" word for following the Constitution -- originalist? I've heard that too. What is the difference?


35 posted on 07/16/2005 9:02:48 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
For the most part the terms are regarded as interchangeable. But technically, "strict constructionist" simply means that you allow little or no latitude at all in how you read the words of the document. It more or less means the same as "literalist".

"Originalist", on the other hand, means that you read it according to how the document was originally understood by the generation that wrote and ratified it, as best as can be determined.

For the most part, both approaches will generally give you the same answer.

36 posted on 07/17/2005 8:04:24 AM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
LOL! You're right about that. Not only have they not heard the news, but even if they did they'd deny it.

As Rush says, the MSM is the only business in which the consumer is ALWAYS wrong............and so they have fewer and fewer consumers as time goes by.

37 posted on 07/17/2005 10:13:08 AM PDT by ohioWfan ("If My people, which are called by My name, will humble themselves and pray.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: John Robertson
Invoking Ginsbug and Breyer as a signal that, we approved yours, now you approve ours...will NOT work with the Democrats, at all.

I agree wholeheartedly. The President has tried a similar tactic with Social Security reform to no avail.
38 posted on 07/17/2005 5:06:01 PM PDT by Pirate21 (When in the course of human events... ...are we going to get fightin' mad?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson