Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

They must die! (Great Read!)
WorldNetDaily ^ | 7/8/05 | Kevin McCullough

Posted on 07/08/2005 7:56:17 PM PDT by wagglebee

For the last four years, leftists have pleaded for one thing in how we relate to our enemies in the war on terror. From silly politicians like Howard Dean, who did not even want us to go to Afghanistan; to silly activists like Al Sharpton and silly actors like Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon; to silly talk-radio icons like Al Franken and Ron Kuby, who always seem to rush to the defense of those who commit terrorist acts – they've all asked but one thing.

"Why don't we try to understand their [the terrorists] position, so we can have a better idea of why they do such things?"

The idea behind the pleading has been if we are a humane world, then civilized people should be able to sit down with each other, and reasonably talk their way through any issue that arises. And because it sounds well and good, some wonder what the harm could be in trying it.

Some wonder ... just not me.

On Sept. 11, 2001, I said that I wanted those responsible to pay for what they exacted in human suffering to America. I reiterated time and again throughout the 12 hours I was on the air that day that I wanted them dead.

On July 7, 2005, I said something similar: "I just don't see how anyone can come to any other conclusion on how to deal with these people than to capture them, try them, and put them to death. Or if need be, kill them in the field of battle."

The cowardice that produced not just the 9-11 attacks, but also the attacks that took American lives in Bali, Madrid, Jerusalem, and a handful of other places since 9-11 has only increased due to the American left's desire to "try to understand."

I know what they are getting at. In their mind, everything always has to be America's fault. So if we at one time armed Saddam Hussein because he would help protect American interests in the Middle East, then, by golly, we can never, ever take him out – especially if goes all kooky and dictatorial for more than 30 years. They would argue that we helped prop him up, therefore we are in some way responsible for all the heinous killing he did to hundreds of thousands of his own people.

So their response?

Look the other way.

I suppose that many of them would prefer we ignore Britain's current heart-wrenching situation. Most of the left will probably say: "It's not our business." A handful will justify: "Serves 'em right for going into Iraq." Which interestingly enough is exactly what al-Qaida said in releasing its statement taking credit for the blasts that rocked London. They also warned that Italy and Denmark are next on the list.

Yes, looking the other way certainly kept us out of armed conflict. The first World Trade Tower bombing in 1993, the embassy bombings in Africa, the U.S.S. Cole bombing in which U.S. sailors came home in body bags all certainly sent the message that looking the other way is just a dandy way to go.

What none of the left in America understand is that this life can't be lived by sheer moral relativism. They are afraid of this because they don't wish to be forced to curb their own behavior to actually become moral people. But their fears aside, their unwillingness to look at the face of Satan and call it what it is jeopardizes all of us. These people can not be trusted with national security because they have no sense of the difference between good and evil.

And if they don't "understand" that, then they will never get what I'm about to say.

The only moral way to deal with those who planned and executed the attack in London this week, the attack in Madrid, the attack in Bali, and the multiple attacks on Americans on 9-11 is simple: Track them down. Kill as many of them as we can in the field of battle. Those we capture put on trial. Those who are found guilty, put to death.

I don't really care to understand "why" a crazed jihadist wishes to take the lives of thousands of innocent people. I just want him stopped.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: appeasers; bedwetters; collaborators; leftists; londonattacked; terrorists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: wagglebee

I remember a line in an old Doris Day movie: "We'll give them a fair trial this afternoon and hang them the first thing tomorrow morning."

It works for me.


21 posted on 07/08/2005 8:44:46 PM PDT by Rider on the Rain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I agree with everything this guy says, except the "trial" part.

Imagine the hilarity in a war movie (Say, The Battle of the Bulge) where no enemy soldier is killed before yelling, "Cut!" and having a trial?

Doesn't that sound like a Mel Brooks farce?

22 posted on 07/08/2005 8:46:13 PM PDT by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Works for me.

High Plains justice.


23 posted on 07/08/2005 8:51:22 PM PDT by porkchops 4 mahound (Deus Vult)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Don Carlos

"Peace in our time" (September, 1938)

The result of "peace in our time" (December, 1940)

24 posted on 07/08/2005 8:52:06 PM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I ''get'' why the terrorists hate us, but have to admit I still am puzzled sometimes by the'' terrorists within''. Our friends the lefto liberals and their constant tearing down of our country and everything we stand for. The more I'm exposed to these people the more I've gotten that they are not only stupid and simplistic in their thinking , but they are really naive...... heres what goes on in their heads............If only we didn't chop down the rain forests, if only we weren't so racist, if only we did not destroy the o-zone layer,if only we didn't bomb,if only we gave all our money to feed starving children ,we could cure hunger, if only, if only,...... it goes on and on,till you get till the end of of your patience, when I heard standing in a line the other day, if only we could bring OSSAMA'' to the table,'' we could talk and communicate to resolve our differences, but Bush would rather bomb! I turned around and told this guy if he got OSSAMA'' to the table'' he would bring a meat cleaver and chop your head off! This guy looked rather shocked and told me '' That would never happen cause reasonable people communicate reasonably.''!.................
25 posted on 07/08/2005 8:56:06 PM PDT by Bush gal in LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Shadows In Smoke Create Haunting Satanic Images, Viewers Say

Images of Tuesday's terrorist attacks have been captured in thousands of photographs. Some of the pictures are horrific, some poignant, and some gut-wrenching, but viewers have written in to newspapers and television stations, saying that that they see an even more haunting image in the smoke billowing from the World Trade Center.

Viewers said that in two specific instances, in a photo taken by an Associated Press photographer, and in a video by CNN, they can clearly identify the eyes, nose, mouth and horns of a devil in the black and gray smoke.

They questioned whether the photographers manipulated the photo to include a satanic face.

Vin Alabiso, an AP vice president and executive photo editor, said that the AP photo (pictured, above) was untouched. Readers were reacting to natural indentations in the smoke cloud, he said.

CNN has not made any comments about its picture (pictured, above left). Although the image has been removed from their Web site, the video where the image came from can still be viewed.

http://urbanlegends.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.clickondetroit.com/sh/news/stories/nat%2Dnews%2D96283920010917%2D120936.html

26 posted on 07/08/2005 8:57:53 PM PDT by bitt ('We will all soon reap what the ignorant are now sowing.' Victor Davis Hanson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"Why don't we try to understand their [the terrorists] position, so we can have a better idea of why they do such things?"

I love it.
Why don't they try strapping a bomb on their a$$ and detonate it. The understanding of why islam dose such things will be clear as your head tumbles in da air.

Jammer
27 posted on 07/08/2005 9:00:35 PM PDT by JamminJAY (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Every single homicidal jihadist must be killed, every single one. They were recently reported to be estimated to be about 20,000 or .0001 (1/100th of 1%, (or is it 1/10,000th of the population?), and perhaps 85% of the homicide-suicide bombers are from OUTSIDE Iraq) of the population of Iraq, and far less than that elsewhere.

(I would guess that far fewer than 20,000 (Maybe 2,000? Who knows?) are truly homi-suicidal, pseudo-religous cons about paradise going to murderers notwithstanding.)

At the outset fot he war on terror, the best guess was that there wer perhaps 5 to 10,000 of these psychopathic creeps worldwide, which I then said need to be KILLED, each and every one of them.

Non-homicidal jihadists need not be killed.


28 posted on 07/08/2005 9:30:15 PM PDT by FReethesheeples (Gonzales iappears to be quite WEAK on Property rights!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortunecookie
"Those who are found guilty, put to death. Let's hope that's 100%."

That's easy - if they're within 12,000 miles, they're guilty

29 posted on 07/08/2005 9:31:44 PM PDT by castlebrew (true gun control is hitting where you're aiming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Bump for later read!


30 posted on 07/08/2005 9:36:15 PM PDT by Romish_Papist (The times are out of step with the Catholic Church. God Bless Pope Benedict XVI.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
31 posted on 07/08/2005 9:40:03 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norraad

I wish. I hope someone is working on it. I see some of them and I just don't get how they don't get it except that they are wrapped up in their own selves and perceived self-importance.


32 posted on 07/08/2005 9:55:22 PM PDT by fortunecookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
Yes and no. I agree they love the dying and would love to be rid of us, but their self-loathing means they still hate us because we represent what they could become if they allowed themselves to feel the rage they must feel at those who attack us on our soil.

So they have a self-loathing because they feel guilty for being 'advantaged' while the terrorists are 'disadvantaged' (poor), you know, they attack us because we have and they don't and surely we somehow robbed them to get it. They do need the victimhood and martyrdom, but will come to love us on the left only if we recognize our faults and join them in their misery. Which we won't.

A few of them might come to see our side, usually after being victimized by those they pity, but then those are lost to the lefties and loathed by them as well. To them, we are mean-spirited (sorry, I hate that term) and this gives them just cause (b/c they have no valid other one) to hate us. And they do hate us when we fight back. Any excuse, really.

33 posted on 07/08/2005 10:18:52 PM PDT by fortunecookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000
LOL.

Service with a smile? More kindness than we were shown, to be sure.

34 posted on 07/08/2005 10:23:45 PM PDT by fortunecookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: castlebrew
That's easy - if they're within 12,000 miles, they're guilty.

It really does seem that way, more and more. Just like the DU, they can only spout the party line of hate. Check out this Muslim shopkeeper's reaction to the terror attack. Chilling.

35 posted on 07/08/2005 10:28:41 PM PDT by fortunecookie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Great post, wagglebee........and I love all of your comments, too.......like, "Hell, for that matter who would ever want to "understand" the thinking of anybody who thought blowing themself up was a worthwhile idea."

Simply excellent.....although the logistical, practical realistic problem with "track them down, one by one......." is that they are everywhere, like an infestation of our entire planet. The "one-by-one" tracking-down proposal isn't feasible. What's going to be necessary is a display of tactical nuclear shock and awe, because if the leadership of this country thinks that we'll just quietly spend the next 3 or 4 decades tediously transforming current dictatorships into democracies, the task of truly, swiftly (and yes, brutally) defeating islamofascism will likely never get done, because while we're conducting that "transformation," Eurabia will be a fait accompli - done deal - Muslimized Europe. Then what?!

Char

36 posted on 07/08/2005 10:46:48 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I propose a co-Clinton team as permanent reps to Pyonyang, w/out possibility of repatriation....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FReethesheeples
"Non-homicidal jihadists need not be killed."

You are FAR too compassionate...

All Jihadists must be killed...
The Clerics that poisoned their minds, must be killed.
The high and mighty that financed them, must be killed..
The lowly that give them encouragement, support and aid, must be killed..
The brood mares that teach them to hate, as they suckle them, must be killed..
The non-Muslim bastards that armed them, must be killed..
All that stand with our enemy, and desire our defeat, must surrender UNCONDITIONALLY or die.
The diplomats and politicians that wished to profit from dealing with our enemy, SHOULD be severely punished and distrusted for decades.
That's as compassionate as I can be....

I'm stuck in the Old Testament, haven't made it to the New Testament yet ---- been too busy ducking!

Semper Fi

37 posted on 07/08/2005 10:57:13 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Leftists cry "Why don't we try to understand their [the terrorists] position, so we can have"... a Police State? Do I win a prize? Cause it is working. If we would attack Islam like we did the Japanese after Pearl Harbor, not only would this war be over, but we would have won AND be free men. Now we have Military Police in the streets, need a Passport to go to Mexico and the Constitution is null and void in the light of the "Patriot Act".

If you ask me, the Leftist's won. Our response to the Attack by Islam has not converted two Islamic Countries to Democracy, it has converted two Democracy's into Fascist police States. America and Israel both do not have private property rights anymore, and our elections are circuses, because Congress no longer makes the laws, the Lawyers in Cleric drag sitting on the Supreme court do. Free countries have representation, our dictators are safely removed from elections.

Bye, bye American Pie...

38 posted on 07/09/2005 2:58:35 AM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The only moral way to deal with those who planned and executed the attack in London this week, the attack in Madrid, the attack in Bali, and the multiple attacks on Americans on 9-11 is simple: Track them down. Kill as many of them as we can in the field of battle. Those we capture put on trial. Those who are found guilty, put to death.

I don't really care to understand "why" a crazed jihadist wishes to take the lives of thousands of innocent people. I just want him stopped.




So true. One thing I wish to add: the litmus test for innocent/guilty must simply be "probably perpetrated", not "beyond reasonable doubt". We have to be willing to accept that some innocents will be caught in the net, and that they will be killed too. Sad, but it might make it more likely that the innocent will GO OUT OF THEIR WAY TO KEEP UP AN APPEARANCE OF INNOCENCE.

If some Senators, Congressmen, reporters, CAIR spokesmen and DUmmies get caught in that net, so much the better.


39 posted on 07/09/2005 1:35:05 PM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

bump


40 posted on 07/09/2005 5:15:49 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson