Outstanding Rush, truely outstanding.

To argue with a liberal, he'd do better by following an advice of one Nicholas Gogol: "By Lord, Ivan Ivanovich, one ought to have eaten a lot of beans before talking to you!" Garlic works well, too.

I noticed that liberals love to flaunt their "education" and imply that I'm a totally uneducated hack when they're losing the argument on merit.

They don't hesitate to resort to personal attacks, for sure.

See Proverbs 26 about liberals.

NOT AT ALL. She SHOULD laugh in their faces.

Your enemy sets the rules of war(debate).

Not necessarily. They may be reserving books like Richard Clark's - a big bag of tripe, wth a definite anti-Bush agenda. Then again, she may be reading more into it that is warranted. I heard the caller, and tend to believe she knew what she was talking about.

JMHO

Rush is going to cause this young woman to be out of a job. After the initial shock wears off, the office grapevine will be in full hum, attributing all manner of neanderthal thoughts and motivations. If she's not set up for a fall and fired outright, she'll be frozen out and ridiculed until she leaves. University politics is unbelievably bitter and destructive. If she's so unhappy, and I probably would be in the same position, she needs to have her ducks in a row, with a job outside of academia, before she finally rips into them, that's all I've got to say.

Rush is going to cause this young woman to be out of a job.

That was my thought too, but Rush's advice is interesting. That is exactly how some of my liberal friends treat me and my comments. (Laugh and imply that I must be loosing it, cause I surely am smart enough to see the liberal idea is the only correct position,.. Ug.

Yeah, and since they're liberals, they can change the rules in midstream.

I often find that laughing at people when they are being true to their beliefs(whatever they may be) IS in fact being confrontational. But to each their own I guess.

I think you're right. University politics is very petty, very ugly. Wearing a hat like that is simply asking for trouble. That doesn't mean that you don't have to stand up for what you believe in, but it's imprudent to start fights by laughing at people if you don't have a fallback position. A young and apparently unconfident girl can't really argue with, persuade, and win over an office of twenty hardened leftists. They are immune to the application of logic.

I respect your warning to her, but she's an adult and should confront these vile, backstabbing hypocrites for who they are. She has a reason to stand up for what she believe in.

If we're ever to clean up the vomit that these liberal professors have spued into these young minds of mush, then we MUST confront them, in a manner that they have earned and deserve.

"That is exactly how some of my liberal friends treat me and my comments."

The best thing to do is to turn their own methods on them. For instance, the argument that homosexuality is genetic... they're desiring to appear tolerant and inclusive, and therefore haven't really given it any further thought. They're also invariably "pro-choice," because they want equality in all things for women, including the liberty to have sex without consequence. That creates an interesting "teachable moment" (another term swiped from the left), when the question is asked: "What should society do, when parents decide to abort the fetus because the fetus tests positive for the homosexuality gene? Surely you understand that, in most of the world, homosexuality is regarded as undesireable, and would result in an abortion?"

There are inherent conflicts in nearly all the positions of the left. There is so much incoherency there, that there is no end of opportunities to create that teachable moment again and again, pertaining to a wide variety of subject matter. It does take familiarity with just what is deemed axiomatic among leftists, though. Most people don't really know them well enough to pull this off, but I would think that the young woman who called in to Rush would know.

She'd still be out of a job, though.

To confront them....is the point.

Humor is precisely the attitude I take when I get the liberal playbook. Works like a charm.

I believe that she was referring to the materials that professors put on reserve in the library for their students to use, not the professor's personal reading material. Those materials may be suggested or required reading in the course. As an alternative to requiring students to buy the books (they could also be out of print), they reserve them in the library to guarantee their availability for the class. The caller's access to those materials is cluing her in that the professors are requiring reading that may have questionable relevance to the course description, as well as serving to indoctrinate students to leftist ideology. That's where the problem is. What the professor reads on his own time shouldn't bother anybody.

"What the professor reads on his own time shouldn't bother anybody."

Unless it's the Unabomber Manifesto.

The liberal isn't interested in those things...truely. A liberal is only interested in how he is perceived to think about those things. There is a big difference. A liberal is only interested in himself, and nothing else.

I submit the following:

Neo-Socialism: A Decomposition of the Liberal Mind

TheRealityCheck

To attempt and understand the many varied positions and policies embraced, or otherwise represented by the Left, we must assume that, at some base level, they are founded in a semblance of logic and purpose. Though extremely difficult, the challenge then is to establish what that logic and purpose may be and from where it is derived. If this is established, an understanding can be developed that begins to decode their seeming day to day defiance of logic, history and common sense … thereby mitigating, albeit just a little, the extreme and frustrating befuddlement most mainstream Americans inherently feel when confronted with the illogical output of a Liberal mind. You see, to the Left, history, fact and logic are secondary to the defense and promotion of its philosophy…a philosophy that is rooted in Socialism. Given the historical irrelevance that has befallen Socialism (or Socialist policy) in all its manifestations, the Left must effectively reverse engineer nearly all forms of reality in order for it to conform … or lend justification to, its core set of beliefs. Socialism (and its younger cousin Liberalism) has in effect become a religion that has been proven false by virtually any objective means, and the followers of this religion must necessarily either be dupes or duplicitous in their allegiance to the faith. It has devolved into being a belief system sustained by emotion not cognition, but one that nevertheless seeks cognitive validation. So the requirement for the illogical to become logical and for fiction to become fact (or fact-fiction) has indeed become a high priority for the keepers and purveyors of this doctrine. Once you accept this, well, then Liberalism makes perfect sense.

Philosophy Verses Reality

Fundamentally, Socialism is the complete discarding of the institution of private property by transforming it to public property. The resulting public income is to be, then, equally and indiscriminately distributed to the population (Liberals strive toward this end through the levying of taxes and tight governmental controls). In Socialism, private property is anathema to this objective.

The main tenets of Socialism are:

2. Equality of income (“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need” – Karl Marx)

3. Class interests oppose each other (class struggle)

4. Government is, or should be the progressive representation of the interests of the working class

Modern Socialism also contends that Capitalism must be exported to where new land can be appropriated and workers exploited to sustain its insatiable gluttony.

The problem for the Left is that the doctrine they hold so dear has all been proven false by history and reality…and they don’t want to let go. After a century and a half of tyranny and catastrophic economic failures, along with the inarguable benefits to the human condition wrought by Capitalism, the Left is now forced to re-package their convictions, revise history, identify new “victims” and champion new causes in order to sustain the orthodoxy. As Daniel J. Flynn establishes, in his book “Why the Left Hates America”, the Left has substituted their overt hysterics regarding the evils of Capitalism, with the new hysterics of racism, sexism, xenophobia, homophobia, etc., etc. However, the enemy remains the same. America, as the globe’s preeminent cultural, political (Democratic), economic (Capitalist) and military power, is now decried as a cultural oppressor … propagating inequality both inside and outside of its borders. Government is again to be the final distributor of cultural equality … as well as economic equality. Liberal causes now collectively rally around the banner of this nefarious new notion of American repressive cultural hegemony that is proliferated by “intolerant rednecks” and imposed by American military and economic might. Nearly all contemporary Liberal causes and policy can be traced back to any one or more of these (and/or the aforementioned) basic tenets of Socialism, or “Neo-Socialism”.

Environmentalism

Environmentalists contend that U.S. industry (“big business”) is indiscriminately exploiting the land and people for economic gain, and that this evil is being exported. This subscribes to their contention that the US has had to export capitalist hegemony to sustain growth to the detriment of the environment, and on the backs of the underclass. Environmentalists are, however conspicuous in their exaggerated claims and selective criticisms which are nearly all exclusively targeted at the U.S. - Thereby exposing their political, rather than environmental agenda.

Relativism/Multi-Culturalism/ Racism/ Homophobia/ Xenophobia

These class-isms allow for the invention of multiple victim classes that can be established as the new “proletariat”. By fostering, contriving, or otherwise promoting notions of injustice and inequality, the Left can progress their Socialist doctrine of the new class struggle while allowing them to cling to the original foundations of their faith. This fact is perhaps most plainly represented by the group, International A.N.S.W.E.R. (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism). The name evokes racism as an issue, yet the organization is a known front group for the World Workers Party, a Marxist-Leninist political party.

Anti-Business/Anti-Prosperity

This too, is rooted in the Socialist/Marxist notion of the exploitation of the working class, opposition to private ownership and their desire to redistribute peoples wealth. Business owners, though they create jobs and wealth, are vilified as greedy parasites taking advantage of the underclass. Sound familiar? Wealth to the left is inherently bad or unfair and should be redistributed to others in the form of taxes and government programs to foster economic parity. Conversely, tax reduction programs are reflexively condemned as initiatives to further prop up the rich at the expense of the poor.

Anti-Globalization

Again, the Left resists the globalization of economies as it represents the exportation of Capitalism and all its associated evils. It appears that, to the die hard Left, equally applied poverty is preferable to unequally applied prosperity.

Anti (Judeo-Christian) Religion-ism

Atheism has deep roots in Socialism (as religion is regarded as a threat to Socialist evolution) and its remnants clearly exist in modern day Liberalism. The examples are ever increasing and undeniable. These tendencies manifest themselves in anti-religion, (with particular animus toward Christianity) speech, discrimination, legislation and other repressive actions. Pro-abortion advocacy is also partially rooted in anti-religion sentiments as much as it is about anxiety over freedom and “choice”. Abortion has been politicized for use as tool to promote the notion of women as an oppressed class. The oppressor class is presumed to be men and people of faith. The Left can then feel free to promote actions that restrict the freedom of religion in the name of protecting this oppressed class. In other words, they seek the oppression of religion in the name of freedom, while presuming to take the moral high ground.

“Peace” Activism

All of the above

It is a reality that the American governmental and economic system has improved the lives of its people and those around the world to a level unparalleled in human history. Its profound and positive contributions to culture, science, medicine and freedom, are undeniable to any reasonably objective and discerning mind. No past or present Socialist venture can even remotely claim to have achieved the levels of economic prosperity (at all stratums of society), racial equality, women’s rights and equal protections for all its citizens regardless of sex, faith, cultural, racial, or social background. A quick check of your Encyclopedia Britannica will bear this out. These truths are a testament to the benevolence and inherent morality of this great and successful American experiment. Is America perfect? No. Do we have many historical shames and societal ills that need to be resolved? Of course ... What country doesn’t? But, there exists no other nation that is as willing or capable of identifying and fairly addressing the problems with which it is confronted.

Oppression

By contrast, not a Single Socialist or Communist state has ever existed that has been popularly elected or otherwise sustained by the will of its people. Socialist-Communist regimes have, throughout history, maintained power solely through the strict imposition of personal, cultural and intellectual martial law. The media, schools, arts and literature have all been strictly controlled to manage thought and freedom of ideas. It should be no surprise then that the liberal establishment maintains a covetous and disproportionate control over our educational institutions, media (with the exception of radio) and the arts. The packaging may be slightly different today, but the tactics are largely the same and quite plain to see. You need only review the statements and policies espoused by “civil rights” groups, “anti-war” organizations, the ACLU, Teacher’s Unions and the curricula of our institutions of higher education (indoctrination?) to quickly assess that our most basic American freedoms are at risk from the Left. Oppression (factual, intellectual, or otherwise) is the only means by which the Socialist agenda can succeed.

So, the next time you bear witness to the mindless sloganeering, claims of injustice and inequality, hysterics regarding business, the environment, anti-war, abortion, anti-religion and the blame America crowd … know where they’re coming from and where they want to go.

Gary Schneider is the President and founder of TheRealityCheck.Org, Inc., a Conservative policy advocacy group established to promote and defend conservative social, political and economic principles nationally, through the origination and dissemination of commentary, analysis, news and research tools via the public Internet and other channels. TheRealityCheck.Org, Inc. is located in Fairfield County, CT.

Schneider received his degree in Government and Russian Studies at Norwich University’s Military College of Vermont, the nations oldest private military academy. At Norwich he held numerous leadership positions within the Corp of Cadets. In 1989 Schneider moved to New York, where he initially conducted financial research for various on-line and print publications used by Wall Street investors. Since that time, he has built and led research teams and oversaw the creation of global financial research and news products for some of the largest media organizations in the world to include Thomson Financial and Reuters, the worlds largest news and television agency. Schneider has also attended executive leadership training at the University of Michigan and received a certificate in e-Commerce from New York University. His articles have most recently appeared in America's Voices, IntellectualConservative.com, TheRightWing.com, CommonConservative.com, The Patriotist, American Daily and EnterStageRight.

During his 14 year career, Schneider has traveled extensively to Europe and throughout the United States. In addition to Politics and Finance, his hobbies include fitness, mountain-biking and is actively involved in his Church.