Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lindsey Graham issues warning to DemocRATS on Hannity show
Hannity show | 7-6-05 | dfu

Posted on 07/06/2005 1:54:53 PM PDT by doug from upland

Senator Lindsey Graham made it very clear on the Hannity radio show today. If some conservatives thought he would get wobbly in the Supreme Court battle, that fear should now be abated.

Graham will support the Constitutional option if the DemocRATS try to filibuster a qualified candidate because of ideology.

Graham noted that it was not done with Scalia or Ginsberg. It has never been done that way.

He further noted that the President, who was elected twice, made it clear that he most respects Scalia and Clarence Thomas. That is the type of pick Graham expects.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; filibuster; graham; hannity; nuclearoption; obstructionistrats; scotus; senaterats; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-210 next last
To: nopardons

Thanks, I was starting to think I was hearing things (or, that the burrito I ate for lunch had been talking to me!).


121 posted on 07/06/2005 3:21:15 PM PDT by jettester (I got paid to break 'em - not fly 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Graham did duck the question on Bolton who he assured us in an earlier Hannity appearance would get an up or down vote.


122 posted on 07/06/2005 3:21:41 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat

I just heard John Warner say he would also vote for the constitutional option if democrats invoke the filibuster. Interesting.


123 posted on 07/06/2005 3:23:24 PM PDT by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: dc-zoo

Even the RINOS know this is a battle we must win. I think we will see some gona..........no, let's say we will see some backbone here.


124 posted on 07/06/2005 3:30:41 PM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Good question -- jury is still out on this one. I think he is stupid though and his attempting to best the junior senator from NY makes him make dumb moves. I also think that neither of the NY Senators have a lot of political savvy, e.g. Hillary waving the newspaper rag around on the Senate floor about when Bush knew -- never forget that one.

That said think it is a toss-up but it sure backfired if he was trying to stir the pot! Looks like an idiot if he now says he didn't mean it -- I think he got carried away and forgot where he was up to but I notice Republicans are not taking the bait just in case. Better to let Americans see Schumer as a Senator out of touch with reality!


125 posted on 07/06/2005 3:34:09 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor in '06; Allen/Watts in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Don't think the Dems won't oppose the nominee on some BS ethical, etc. ground as well. This is what I am afraid of. Then and the moderate 7 caving citing they alternative BS reasoning.

Sen. Graham did sound sincere in the Hannity interview so we shall see.


126 posted on 07/06/2005 3:35:00 PM PDT by ConservativeLawStudent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Very good advice. I think people should let it play out and not worry so much. People were wringing their hands on here in 2000 about the VP was going to be pro-abortion. I did a long vanity on why not and said I would leave FR for good if he picked a pro-abortion person. I am still here because the pick was Dick Cheney.

People on here took his defense of Gonzales to mean he was the person he was picking -- he was just mad at everyone going after him. No way would this President tip his hand IMHO! Never has before.


127 posted on 07/06/2005 3:37:17 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor in '06; Allen/Watts in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

good hope this schlep woke up and grew a pair


128 posted on 07/06/2005 3:37:50 PM PDT by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

He also took the time to get in several references to the fact HE would support a Scalia and that HE was a pro-Life Constitutionalist. Using the opportunity to attempt to concince people back home, I suspect.

This is the same Lindsey that is taking shots at the handling of the WOT and urging tax increases.

Look, if Lindsey does the right thing I'll take it. I have no scruples that would prohibit using him as he has used us to launch his "maverick" career.

But I cannot be persuaded he was converted on a lonely dusty street in Washington and suddenly saw the light. He isn't to be trusted, and I want him gone in '08.

Until then it's quite possible the furor we launched scared him back to the right side of the aisle, but we'll see. he qualified his very last remark about agreeing to end the filibuster at the end of his segment. If he had responded with a simple "YES" I'd be more likely to believe he means it.


129 posted on 07/06/2005 3:37:57 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

What I heard him say was that if the Democrats' filibuster was "unfair" he would vote for the nuclear option. He wasn't asked what would constitute
"unfair."


130 posted on 07/06/2005 3:38:14 PM PDT by bayourod (Winning elections is everything in a democracy. Losing is for people unclear on the concept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Graham and DeWine are good to go on giving Circuit Court nominees an up or down vote. I think the GOP has always had the margin necessary to successfully terminate the improper use of cloture to deny nominees a vote in the Senate.

The GOP has shown commendable restraint in crafting prototype language for the Constitutional Option. My wish is that they would be more forthcoming with a basic education regarding the purpose of cloture for their constituents.

131 posted on 07/06/2005 3:38:50 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

All of his nominations have been qualified IMHO and all were vetted. Graham is wrong if you ask me!


132 posted on 07/06/2005 3:39:10 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor in '06; Allen/Watts in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: rhc2000
To be fair, he's always held the position that if the Dems try to filibuster a qualified candidate, that he'd be the first person to call for the Constitutional Option.

Unfortunately, you leave out the little fact that he would first have to crawl out of McStain's butt, and then get permission from the Manchurian Pilot to do ANYTHING!

Hey, Lindsey...here's a helpful clue...when you want to do something that McStain doesn't want to do, just flash him that Queen of Hearts playing card....it's easier that way!

133 posted on 07/06/2005 3:40:01 PM PDT by Itzlzha ("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dc-zoo

"I just heard John Warner say he would also vote for the constitutional option if democrats invoke the filibuster. Interesting."

In the end, Bush will get his appointments.

I'm certain Bush would prefer to do it with decorum, rather than ugly. (Unlike the popular outcry on FR, I'll give benefit of doubt to some of the seven Republicans in the deal. I think they too want decorum, and the politeness of the Senate of olde.)

The dems sound like they will go ugly. Since they will not actually block the confirmations, they must make as much noise as possible, to convince their constituents they tried really hard.)

Earlier, Fred Thompson was appointed to spirit the process, eg. assist in the confirmation.

It will be fun to listen and watch a professional smooth talking southern lawyer, actor and politician wrap words around the deaniac party crazies. He'll talk Tennessee'an.

Bush talkin Texican. Cheney talkin Wyomin cowboy.

Stay tuned. Good show coming up.


134 posted on 07/06/2005 3:41:35 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Methinks Graham's phone might have rang off the hook for a little while after the "deal" was cut.

Maybe we got his attention? He ain't the only one, either.


135 posted on 07/06/2005 3:41:53 PM PDT by AlGone2001 (I'm still waiting to hear from the RNC Chairman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1
Worse, he qualified the condition something like this:

"only filibusters for ideological reasons THAT ARE UNFAIR would constitute using the nuclear option. "

136 posted on 07/06/2005 3:43:35 PM PDT by bayourod (Winning elections is everything in a democracy. Losing is for people unclear on the concept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Oh, please. I saw Mr. Graham this weekend and he said the most important thing about this process is the dignity of the senate. He is wrong, and I do not believe he has the backbone to stand up for the president's nomination.
137 posted on 07/06/2005 3:45:10 PM PDT by roylene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Odds are that the Pubbies remain consistent -- they will pull defeat out of the jaws of victory --- again.

Sad, isn't it? I keep hoping the SCOTUS nomination will be different.

138 posted on 07/06/2005 3:46:45 PM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Scalia and Clarence Thomas. That is the type of pick Graham expects.

We BETTER get Scalia or Thoms type picks! It is precisely for such a time as this that I voted for W, twice, as did millions of other constitutional conservatives. Now is the time to deliver, Mr. President! Now is the time to have a backbone, Republicans!

139 posted on 07/06/2005 3:47:26 PM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Constitutional conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Thanks for the update.

Lindsey wants to keep his job. Remember, he is a Republican 'by day' and a rat 'by night.'

What a country!


140 posted on 07/06/2005 3:55:50 PM PDT by gipper81 (Does anyone really believe that male, Reagan Democrats will vote for HRC for POTUS?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-210 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson