Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SUPREME COURT RULING: You can arrest those using marijuana for medical purposes

Posted on 06/06/2005 7:16:18 AM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs

Per Fox News:

The Supreme Court has ruled Medical Marijuana as illegal.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: angrydopeheads; angrynannies; backtosniffingglue; bitterbitterdopers; bitterbitternannies; bitterbittersweets; bongbrigade; buzzkill; cluelesswoders; cruelty; doperhell; farout; fedophiles; hahahahahaha; illtoketothat; justsayno; keepgypsumlegal; libertarianlastdays; medicalmarijuana; mrleroyweeps; newdealotry; newdealots; nohightimes; pissedhippies; ruling; scalia; scotus; screwtheconstitution; statism; statistsrejoice; thebuzzisgone; timetosoberup; weeddude; whatstatesrights; wod; wodlist; wowman; youforgottheruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 1,261-1,272 next last
To: libertarianben
Let me give you my answer to a question I've been asked a few times.

When I mention my strong belief in the Second Admendment as plainly written,several white men have asked me,a white man, if I want all the "gasp" blacks armed. To which my reply has been for years , and remains,: "Why not, as long as all the white,red,green,yellow, and any other are too. Because the bad guys will always have weapons regardless of the laws and the LACK of weapons by the good people is what enables bad gangs and bad governments to exist."

861 posted on 06/06/2005 8:24:30 PM PDT by hoosierham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 853 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

By that logic, wouldn't diet fads have effects on 'interstate commerce'?


862 posted on 06/06/2005 8:24:36 PM PDT by seacapn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 854 | View Replies]

To: missyme
"DO you really think the FDA wants to Cure Cancer or MS Healthcare is Big Buisness and they make no money from Marijuana ... "

We have a winner! Your award:


863 posted on 06/06/2005 8:24:36 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 760 | View Replies]

To: libertarianben
Being able to laugh at oneself is sometimes good for the soul.

And you are more correct than you knew.

864 posted on 06/06/2005 8:26:45 PM PDT by hoosierham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 856 | View Replies]

To: derheimwill

A 3rd party? Me?

FOFLOL!!!

What have you been smoking??


865 posted on 06/06/2005 8:28:44 PM PDT by HKMk23 (Ladies, "No" should not mean "No"; it should mean "Don't even THINK it or I'll for real KILL you!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 845 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham

I agree with you. I was talking about something else.


866 posted on 06/06/2005 8:31:52 PM PDT by libertarianben (Looking for sanity and his hard to find cousin common sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 861 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
'm coming closer and closer to moving to another country. Which one?

You might want to consider New Zealand - a former socialist dump that underwent a libertarian transformation a few years ago. It now not only has an economy once again, but retains a lot of personal freedoms that Americans have lost.

The downside: a still-powerful Green movement.

867 posted on 06/06/2005 8:32:28 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: excludethis
"The court gave the ruling after FDR threatened to pack the Supreme Court if ..."

The rulings in The Shreveport Rate Cases occurred 20 years prior to FDR and dealt with the substantial effect of intrastate rates on interstate commerce.

"The previous 150 years of court precedent was that the Federal Government could not regulate commerce unless it crossed state lines."

Just because they didn't doesn't mean they couldn't.

868 posted on 06/06/2005 8:33:17 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 779 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham

"And you are more correct than you knew."

I usually am.


869 posted on 06/06/2005 8:33:25 PM PDT by libertarianben (Looking for sanity and his hard to find cousin common sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 864 | View Replies]

To: Born in a Rage

Yeah but today's ruling will just make people go back in closed doors to smoke pot nothing new..

The WOD is a massive failure and maybe the next generation of Judges will have the smarts to turn this controversy around...


870 posted on 06/06/2005 8:34:58 PM PDT by missyme (Tell it like it is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 859 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

BHC ?


871 posted on 06/06/2005 8:35:43 PM PDT by missyme (Tell it like it is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 863 | View Replies]

To: BlazingArizona
That's a red herring. Border control is properly a matter for the Feds, falling under national defense and therefore being specifically enumerated in the Constitution.

A better argument: in general, states shold be able to set their own policy in any area that does not prevent other states from choosing differently. If Arizona were to start letting illegal aliens in without restriction, the right of neighboring states that may wish to set different policies would be infringed. But one state allowing patients to grow their own wacky weed, no interstate commmerce involved, does not affect the right of neighboring states to be more restrictive.

An excellent point. Scary, too - the Feds no longer need even the appearance of interstate commerce to interfere in states' matters. States' rights have been dealt a blow today, a very severe blow.

872 posted on 06/06/2005 8:35:47 PM PDT by highball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 860 | View Replies]

To: chuckwalla

Yeah spend there money looking for HOT Spots while terrorists climb the border fences, WOW the Feds working at there finest!


873 posted on 06/06/2005 8:37:30 PM PDT by missyme (Tell it like it is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes

I agree, it is funny to see a desired outcome turns liberals into conservatives and vice versa.


874 posted on 06/06/2005 8:37:31 PM PDT by NavVet (“Benedict Arnold was wounded in battle fighting for America, but no one remembers him for that.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies]

To: LAURENTIJ
There's plenty of good alternate methods available. I'd rather have my 12 guage take away the pain if it got bad enough.

If I had a terminal disease, the legality of any palliative my doctor and I decide on would not even enter into my decision. It's my disease, not some judge's. But I would definitely value that 12-gauge, in case I need to defend my decision against your goons.

875 posted on 06/06/2005 8:38:44 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: derheimwill

Huh?


876 posted on 06/06/2005 8:42:27 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 748 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

What part of the constitution says that it's illegal for the federal governement to make a law regarding the legality of Marijuana?

I'm at the beach on vacation and am feeling too lazy to do my own research.

thanks!


877 posted on 06/06/2005 8:42:43 PM PDT by Cosmo (Liberalism is for girls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: libertarianben
Blame it on the school system,they only taught me and my classmates the names and dates and little or none of the why.Independent reading filled in some of the gaps but never forget that the winners publish the history books.

HOWEver one fascinating book almost suggests a certain English general and his brother Admiral botched their side of the Revolutionary War in order to secretly help the colonists.I think few wars are fought over the main stated reason,it's always a complex mix with greed and power lust heavily represented.That doesn't mean some of the leaders orcombatants aren't vile and reprehensible.

878 posted on 06/06/2005 8:44:13 PM PDT by hoosierham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 866 | View Replies]

To: missyme

You and your conspiracy theories.


879 posted on 06/06/2005 8:46:01 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 871 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
You said: "He could have grown his allotted share, sold some to market and kept some for home use. But he got greedy [and wouldnt give any to market]."
880 posted on 06/06/2005 8:46:40 PM PDT by derheimwill (Love is a person, not an emotion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 876 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 1,261-1,272 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson