Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SUPREME COURT RULING: You can arrest those using marijuana for medical purposes

Posted on 06/06/2005 7:16:18 AM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs

Per Fox News:

The Supreme Court has ruled Medical Marijuana as illegal.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: angrydopeheads; angrynannies; backtosniffingglue; bitterbitterdopers; bitterbitternannies; bitterbittersweets; bongbrigade; buzzkill; cluelesswoders; cruelty; doperhell; farout; fedophiles; hahahahahaha; illtoketothat; justsayno; keepgypsumlegal; libertarianlastdays; medicalmarijuana; mrleroyweeps; newdealotry; newdealots; nohightimes; pissedhippies; ruling; scalia; scotus; screwtheconstitution; statism; statistsrejoice; thebuzzisgone; timetosoberup; weeddude; whatstatesrights; wod; wodlist; wowman; youforgottheruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 1,261-1,272 next last
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

I can kill my unborn and say its my body my choice, but i cant toke up. What a F'd up society we have created!


601 posted on 06/06/2005 2:31:32 PM PDT by beansox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moondoggie

NO I said your statement is juvenile and the hypocrisy with the government and the Pharmecutical Industry is dreadful...You can let the government dictate your entire life by telling you what's right or wrong, but as long as American Citizens are not harming others or engaging in criminal behaviour this leagl issue on Marijuana is a joke when it comes to the Federal Government.


602 posted on 06/06/2005 2:36:08 PM PDT by missyme (Tell it like it is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 594 | View Replies]

To: beansox

That's no lie..Freaking hypocrite Judges!


603 posted on 06/06/2005 2:37:19 PM PDT by missyme (Tell it like it is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 601 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow
Glad to see we agree Mark.

You're a very smart man.

604 posted on 06/06/2005 2:38:04 PM PDT by nunya bidness (Remember, they hated Him first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

Comment #605 Removed by Moderator

Comment #606 Removed by Moderator

To: AmishDude

You mean like, laws passed by the state legislatures limiting abortion, or laws passed by the state legislatures outlawing sodomy? Those laws?

Oh, no, they don't count?


607 posted on 06/06/2005 2:40:47 PM PDT by CobaltBlue (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Comment #608 Removed by Moderator

To: missyme
You can let the government dictate your entire life by telling you what's right or wrong, but as long as American Citizens are not harming others or engaging in criminal behaviour this leagl issue on Marijuana is a joke when it comes to the Federal Government.

In other words....

Laws are made to be broken.

609 posted on 06/06/2005 2:49:28 PM PDT by moondoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 602 | View Replies]

To: moondoggie

If it's between life and death it sure is!


610 posted on 06/06/2005 2:53:28 PM PDT by missyme (Tell it like it is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

Comment #611 Removed by Moderator

To: Publius Valerius
You mean states have rights! I thought they were just subdivisons of the federal government!

*Looks shocked and confused*
612 posted on 06/06/2005 3:00:03 PM PDT by libertarianben (Looking for sanity and his hard to find cousin common sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies]

To: seamole; coloradan
You're claiming he said suicide over pot. That would be a choice he could make only if the only way he could avoid pot would be suicide.

No.

He's in a lot of pain. Obviously, once he chooses to do something about the pain, his choices include any number of painkillers. One of those is pot; another one (according to his post) is suicide.

It seems to me he was saying if the pain was bad enough, he would choose suicide before he'd try pot.

613 posted on 06/06/2005 3:01:16 PM PDT by newgeezer (America, bless God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 605 | View Replies]

To: mugs99

You and the rest of the "I am not voting Republican again" crowd will NEVER convince me you were lifelong Republicans and I believe I speak for a lot of folks on here.

You and the rest can go stuff it for all I care because chances of you all working at the grassroots for candidates would be slim to none. It is very easy to post on a website how you were a lifelong Republican when no one knows who you are.

Anyone getting this riled up over this pot issue IMHO is one of two things -- a RAT or 3rd party stirring the pot on here or a pot smoker -- neither qualifies as a lifelong Republican.

I am against the use of pot for anything. Someone on pot ran through a stop sign and hit my car and caused me to have a shoulder injury and then the spaced out guy told the cop to test him for alochol because he hadn't been drinking. Smartass ended up on drug charges -- lighted pot cigarette in his ashtray. Guy couldn't put two coherent sentences together BTW. I am against drinking and driving and I am against pot smoking period. And don't give me the crap about cancer patients or that it is not addictive. Not buying any of it!


614 posted on 06/06/2005 3:02:33 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor; Allen in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 512 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

And alleged conservatives will come in and applaud this ruling because they are against pot use. They couldn't care a whit that the ruling is based on one of the most expansionist Supreme Court rulings of all time.

I'm a conservative, and I'm against the use of marijuana, but I hold that it is a state's rights issue, that the commerce clause does not cover this issue. Finally, given the absolute uselessness of laws against marijuana, I side with Milton Freedman and urge legalization, taxation, and state regulation ala alcoholic beverages.


615 posted on 06/06/2005 3:03:54 PM PDT by wiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Anyone getting this riled up over this pot issue IMHO is one of two things -- a RAT or 3rd party stirring the pot on here or a pot smoker -- neither qualifies as a lifelong Republican.

Well, I guess that means I don't belong here. The sooner I get banned, the better.

616 posted on 06/06/2005 3:07:43 PM PDT by Liberal Classic (No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 614 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
Can you imagine the outcry if someone DIED of thier disease during or even after their prosecution?

I take it you've never heard of "Peter McWilliams, author of Ain't Nobody's Business If You Do, [who] died vomiting in his bathtub [in 2000] because a California judge with a withered soul ruled he couldn't use marijuana to keep down his chemotherapy drugs while out on bail on charges of possessing medical marijuana."

617 posted on 06/06/2005 3:09:13 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I am against the use of pot for anything. Someone on pot ran through a stop sign and hit my car and caused me to have a shoulder injury and then the spaced out guy told the cop to test him for alochol because he hadn't been drinking.

Suppose he'd been spaced out on benadryl instead? Would you compel all of us to suffer stuffed sinuses and runny noses under threat of imprisonment?

618 posted on 06/06/2005 3:10:35 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 614 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

Here's an interesting proposition: Say the feds start getting warrants for the homes of everyone who holds a medical marijuana ID/users card. Do you think we might just see a softening of the libs position on gun registration? If the government knows you have it, they can come and take it away.


619 posted on 06/06/2005 3:16:42 PM PDT by July 4th (A vacant lot cancelled out my vote for Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarianben
we now have a case of right-wing judicial activism.

There's nothing right-wing about this decision.

620 posted on 06/06/2005 3:18:13 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 1,261-1,272 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson