Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SUPREME COURT RULING: You can arrest those using marijuana for medical purposes

Posted on 06/06/2005 7:16:18 AM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs

Per Fox News:

The Supreme Court has ruled Medical Marijuana as illegal.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: angrydopeheads; angrynannies; backtosniffingglue; bitterbitterdopers; bitterbitternannies; bitterbittersweets; bongbrigade; buzzkill; cluelesswoders; cruelty; doperhell; farout; fedophiles; hahahahahaha; illtoketothat; justsayno; keepgypsumlegal; libertarianlastdays; medicalmarijuana; mrleroyweeps; newdealotry; newdealots; nohightimes; pissedhippies; ruling; scalia; scotus; screwtheconstitution; statism; statistsrejoice; thebuzzisgone; timetosoberup; weeddude; whatstatesrights; wod; wodlist; wowman; youforgottheruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 1,261-1,272 next last
To: holdonnow
But without the Commerce Clause, what would prevent a pharm. company from developing and selling a drug in their own state, bypassing the FDA?

I'm not asserting that this is such a bad thing, but I can't see any barrier to it.

261 posted on 06/06/2005 9:12:01 AM PDT by AmishDude (Join the AmishDude fan club: "LOL!!!" -- MikeinIraq; "Bravo" -- EODTIM69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
Justice Thomas' dissent is top-notch. Thank you for posting it.

I noted that in another thread on this topic. Racist Democrats insinuate, if not flat out state, that Thomas is a moron. Anyone reading this decent will disagree strongly. Of course, some will say it was a clerk who actually wrote it...

262 posted on 06/06/2005 9:12:15 AM PDT by Paradox (Who cares about his razor, I use Occam's Chainsaw!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost

Massachusets, Oregon, Hawaii.... you're ducking the question.


263 posted on 06/06/2005 9:12:17 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

This has nothing to do with the Supremacy Clause. The question is whether the federal government has the CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY to regulare intrastate commerce. Despite the Constitution limiting the federal government to regulating commerce between the several state, the Court today, once again, rules that it includes commerce wholly within a state.


264 posted on 06/06/2005 9:12:19 AM PDT by holdonnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

No, the Court based its opinion on a atrocious pro-New Deal case which expanded the interstate commerce clause to include just about anything.


265 posted on 06/06/2005 9:12:22 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

That's pro New Deal court ruling.


266 posted on 06/06/2005 9:12:53 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

The state government.


267 posted on 06/06/2005 9:13:02 AM PDT by holdonnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
Massachusets, Oregon, Hawaii.... you're ducking the question.

Which another poster handled.

268 posted on 06/06/2005 9:13:44 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

I am sorry. I know you're a good guy.


269 posted on 06/06/2005 9:13:53 AM PDT by holdonnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
The same reason that we want New Hampshire to convince a majority of people in all 50 states before it legalizes homosexual marriage.

Bingo. And Full Faith and Credit would lead to adopting it in all 50, which is why the push for a constitutional amendment.

270 posted on 06/06/2005 9:14:21 AM PDT by AmishDude (Join the AmishDude fan club: "LOL!!!" -- MikeinIraq; "Bravo" -- EODTIM69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
I have mixed feelings about medical marijuana after watching a cousin slowly dying from cancer being given massive dosages or morphine for his pain and still seeing him in mysery. Eventually he turned to marijuana which gave him some relief.

The problem with the Medical Marijuana law is that its just too easy for "anybody" who wants to smoke it to find an unethical doctor....pay him cash....and get a prescription for it.

Those who are breaking the law have ruined it for the patients who REALLY need it.

271 posted on 06/06/2005 9:15:42 AM PDT by moondoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Ah - so if Congress is doing the usurping, it's less painful than if a federal judge does it.

Congress is the will of the people -- for better or worse.

272 posted on 06/06/2005 9:15:52 AM PDT by AmishDude (Join the AmishDude fan club: "LOL!!!" -- MikeinIraq; "Bravo" -- EODTIM69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
Racist Democrats insinuate, if not flat out state, that Thomas is a moron.

Of course! Rule #1 states one cannot be a non-white conservative.

273 posted on 06/06/2005 9:15:59 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow

I stand corrected. I should have known better than to just read a media account instead of the ruling itself.


274 posted on 06/06/2005 9:16:02 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: kjam22

14th amendment has nothing to do with this. These are state laws. States have all kinds of laws that differ from one another. You don't have a right to medical pot in these states as a CONSTITUTIONAL matter. The same sex marriage issue is a problem because there are efforts to argue it's constitutionally compelled.


275 posted on 06/06/2005 9:16:10 AM PDT by holdonnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Congress is the will of the people -- for better or worse.

That's exactly right. And they come up for re-election on a regular basis.

276 posted on 06/06/2005 9:16:43 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Ah - so if Congress is doing the usurping, it's less painful than if a federal judge does it

What Congress does can be undone. Every two years you have a chance to change its composition. Simply elect sympathetic legislators and prove your case to the rest of us.

What unelected life-tenured federal judges and justices do on the other hand cannot be so easily undone. That's why the federal bench is supposed to stick to interpretation and let the people choose to undo through their legislatures what any particular judge or justice might think is an unwise or foolish law.

And, BTW, Congress isn't "usurping" any power of the federal courts when Congress debates and legislates. The fact that any informed American would think otherwise is an alarming indictment of lack of basic political awareness in out country.

277 posted on 06/06/2005 9:17:19 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow
There have been efforts on this website to argue that the right to medical marijuana is constitutionally compelled.
278 posted on 06/06/2005 9:17:58 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Congress is the will of the people -- for better or worse.

And if the people tomorrow decided to take your home without compensation, and Congress passed a law allowing it, then I guess that would be OK with you, since Congress was just reflecting the will of the people.

279 posted on 06/06/2005 9:18:03 AM PDT by dirtboy (Drooling moron since 1998...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow

I'm confused..........conflicted..........too ill informed to comment. Rush might help me figure this out, but for goodness sake, get on the phone and help him!!


280 posted on 06/06/2005 9:18:11 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@Perplexed.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 1,261-1,272 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson