Skip to comments.
SUPREME COURT RULING: You can arrest those using marijuana for medical purposes
Posted on 06/06/2005 7:16:18 AM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs
Per Fox News:
The Supreme Court has ruled Medical Marijuana as illegal.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: angrydopeheads; angrynannies; backtosniffingglue; bitterbitterdopers; bitterbitternannies; bitterbittersweets; bongbrigade; buzzkill; cluelesswoders; cruelty; doperhell; farout; fedophiles; hahahahahaha; illtoketothat; justsayno; keepgypsumlegal; libertarianlastdays; medicalmarijuana; mrleroyweeps; newdealotry; newdealots; nohightimes; pissedhippies; ruling; scalia; scotus; screwtheconstitution; statism; statistsrejoice; thebuzzisgone; timetosoberup; weeddude; whatstatesrights; wod; wodlist; wowman; youforgottheruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 1,261-1,272 next last
To: LAURENTIJ
You might change your mind if you ever get Cancer or MS
My dear..
So sad your compassion you have with folks who have painful debilitating diseases...
181
posted on
06/06/2005 8:38:45 AM PDT
by
missyme
(Tell it like it is!)
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
To paraphrase Mao --
"In the U.S., we are creating Communism with American characteristics."
182
posted on
06/06/2005 8:39:23 AM PDT
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: newgeezer
Its morphine that prolongs life. It is God's gift to dying people. Cannabis, on the otherhand, is merely God's gift to people in pain.
183
posted on
06/06/2005 8:39:25 AM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
To: brazzaville
I'm probably just being dense, but I don't see how that applies to what I wrote. Are you saying that the will of the People, as expressed through the initiative and referendum processes should not be as binding as the will of the judges or am I just missing your point? The will of the People should not be binding, when it is in opposition to individual rights. Judges make that decision, per their interpretation of the Constitution and other relevant documents. In this case, I have serious disagreements with SCOTUS's interpretation.
184
posted on
06/06/2005 8:40:41 AM PDT
by
Celtjew Libertarian
(Shake Hands with the Serpent: Poetry by Charles Lipsig aka Celtjew http://books.lulu.com/lipsig)
To: JeffAtlanta
Yeah, I doubt that James Dobson will use this decision as an example of judicial activism. Think so? ;)
185
posted on
06/06/2005 8:40:51 AM PDT
by
general_re
("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
To: seacapn
I hope that the DoJ uses its good judgment in this area. Hope for a snow blizzard in hades while you're at it. IMO ... the powers that be just want to make as many criminals as possible
186
posted on
06/06/2005 8:41:05 AM PDT
by
clamper1797
(Advertisments contain the only truths to be relied on in a newspaper)
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
National Review Online/The Corner
COUNT ME WITH THE LIBERTARIANS ON THIS ONE. [Mark R. Levin]
I don't support the widespread legalization of drugs. However, that's beside the point. Based solely on news accounts, this is, in essence, a continuation of Wickard v. Filburn (which involved homegrown wheat), in which interstate commerce was said by the Court to include commerce wholly within a state -- enabling the federal government to regulate virtually without limit state and private economic activity.
Posted at 11:27 AM
To: missyme
I wouldn't use pot even if I had x disease. I refuse to become addicted to it.
There's plenty of good alternate methods available. I'd rather have my 12 guage take away the pain if it got bad enough.
To: dirtboy
And alleged conservatives will come in and applaud this ruling because they are against pot use. They couldn't care a whit that the ruling is based on one of the most expansionist Supreme Court rulings of all time.Conservatives have rarely been non-expansionist (maybe Goldwater). They have tried to change the direction of expansion, though.
189
posted on
06/06/2005 8:42:51 AM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: kjam22
yes because congress had no right to create the law, all powers not explicitly articulated in the constitution are reserved for the states.
im torn on this issue, while I don't like the idea of legal marijuana, I think it is up to the states to decide not the federal government.
I am trying to be consistent on this issue since I also believe that it should be left up to each state to decide if they want to allow abortion.
190
posted on
06/06/2005 8:43:01 AM PDT
by
Nyboe
(From God we receive both our freedom and morality. A Godless society will have neither.)
To: jwalsh07
Sorry, forgot to italicize your quote:
Too many "libertarians" are only unhappy with federal judicial oligarchy when it doesn't accrue to their favor.
I said my piece in agreement with Justice Thomas.
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
What about the bong loading freepers?
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
All the Court said was that Congress has the power to trump state law on this issue, using a Constitutional theory that hatched in the '30s in order to allow the New Deal to pass muster.
To: LAURENTIJ
You cannot be serious? You know Nothing NADA about Marijuana? Addicted? right...
Here's some more ADDICTIONS:
1. Nicotine
2.Alcohol
3.Benzodiam
4.Oxycotin
5.Sugar
6.SEX
DO you stay away from all these? would you use your 12 guage rather than try any of these???
194
posted on
06/06/2005 8:46:20 AM PDT
by
missyme
(Tell it like it is!)
To: alisasny
So are we going to fill the prisons with cancer patients?
Think of the cost of that!
195
posted on
06/06/2005 8:46:20 AM PDT
by
SittinYonder
(Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
To: LAURENTIJ
Have you ever left your house?
To: newgeezer
People are dying from use of pharma approved pain relief.
197
posted on
06/06/2005 8:46:45 AM PDT
by
jayef
(e)
To: LAURENTIJ
I wouldn't use pot even if I had x disease. I refuse to become addicted to it. Where'd you get the idea that pot is addictive?
198
posted on
06/06/2005 8:46:56 AM PDT
by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
HAHA..No Joke..
Bizarre Poster!
199
posted on
06/06/2005 8:47:57 AM PDT
by
missyme
(Tell it like it is!)
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
It appears some old fossils in DC are spouting gibberish again - gibberish increasingly ignored by the American people.
200
posted on
06/06/2005 8:49:04 AM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 1,261-1,272 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson