Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SUPREME COURT RULING: You can arrest those using marijuana for medical purposes

Posted on 06/06/2005 7:16:18 AM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs

Per Fox News:

The Supreme Court has ruled Medical Marijuana as illegal.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: angrydopeheads; angrynannies; backtosniffingglue; bitterbitterdopers; bitterbitternannies; bitterbittersweets; bongbrigade; buzzkill; cluelesswoders; cruelty; doperhell; farout; fedophiles; hahahahahaha; illtoketothat; justsayno; keepgypsumlegal; libertarianlastdays; medicalmarijuana; mrleroyweeps; newdealotry; newdealots; nohightimes; pissedhippies; ruling; scalia; scotus; screwtheconstitution; statism; statistsrejoice; thebuzzisgone; timetosoberup; weeddude; whatstatesrights; wod; wodlist; wowman; youforgottheruling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 1,261-1,272 next last
To: LAURENTIJ

You might change your mind if you ever get Cancer or MS
My dear..

So sad your compassion you have with folks who have painful debilitating diseases...


181 posted on 06/06/2005 8:38:45 AM PDT by missyme (Tell it like it is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
To paraphrase Mao --

"In the U.S., we are creating Communism with American characteristics."

182 posted on 06/06/2005 8:39:23 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

Its morphine that prolongs life. It is God's gift to dying people. Cannabis, on the otherhand, is merely God's gift to people in pain.


183 posted on 06/06/2005 8:39:25 AM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: brazzaville
I'm probably just being dense, but I don't see how that applies to what I wrote. Are you saying that the will of the People, as expressed through the initiative and referendum processes should not be as binding as the will of the judges or am I just missing your point?

The will of the People should not be binding, when it is in opposition to individual rights. Judges make that decision, per their interpretation of the Constitution and other relevant documents. In this case, I have serious disagreements with SCOTUS's interpretation.

184 posted on 06/06/2005 8:40:41 AM PDT by Celtjew Libertarian (Shake Hands with the Serpent: Poetry by Charles Lipsig aka Celtjew http://books.lulu.com/lipsig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: JeffAtlanta
Yeah, I doubt that James Dobson will use this decision as an example of judicial activism.

Think so? ;)

185 posted on 06/06/2005 8:40:51 AM PDT by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: seacapn
I hope that the DoJ uses its good judgment in this area.

Hope for a snow blizzard in hades while you're at it. IMO ... the powers that be just want to make as many criminals as possible

186 posted on 06/06/2005 8:41:05 AM PDT by clamper1797 (Advertisments contain the only truths to be relied on in a newspaper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

National Review Online/The Corner

COUNT ME WITH THE LIBERTARIANS ON THIS ONE. [Mark R. Levin]
I don't support the widespread legalization of drugs. However, that's beside the point. Based solely on news accounts, this is, in essence, a continuation of Wickard v. Filburn (which involved homegrown wheat), in which interstate commerce was said by the Court to include commerce wholly within a state -- enabling the federal government to regulate virtually without limit state and private economic activity.
Posted at 11:27 AM


187 posted on 06/06/2005 8:41:29 AM PDT by holdonnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: missyme

I wouldn't use pot even if I had x disease. I refuse to become addicted to it.

There's plenty of good alternate methods available. I'd rather have my 12 guage take away the pain if it got bad enough.


188 posted on 06/06/2005 8:41:42 AM PDT by LAURENTIJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
And alleged conservatives will come in and applaud this ruling because they are against pot use. They couldn't care a whit that the ruling is based on one of the most expansionist Supreme Court rulings of all time.

Conservatives have rarely been non-expansionist (maybe Goldwater). They have tried to change the direction of expansion, though.

189 posted on 06/06/2005 8:42:51 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: kjam22
yes because congress had no right to create the law, all powers not explicitly articulated in the constitution are reserved for the states.

im torn on this issue, while I don't like the idea of legal marijuana, I think it is up to the states to decide not the federal government.

I am trying to be consistent on this issue since I also believe that it should be left up to each state to decide if they want to allow abortion.
190 posted on 06/06/2005 8:43:01 AM PDT by Nyboe (From God we receive both our freedom and morality. A Godless society will have neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Sorry, forgot to italicize your quote:

Too many "libertarians" are only unhappy with federal judicial oligarchy when it doesn't accrue to their favor.

I said my piece in agreement with Justice Thomas.

191 posted on 06/06/2005 8:43:18 AM PDT by soundandvision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

What about the bong loading freepers?


192 posted on 06/06/2005 8:43:28 AM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

All the Court said was that Congress has the power to trump state law on this issue, using a Constitutional theory that hatched in the '30s in order to allow the New Deal to pass muster.


193 posted on 06/06/2005 8:45:25 AM PDT by mondonico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LAURENTIJ

You cannot be serious? You know Nothing NADA about Marijuana? Addicted? right...

Here's some more ADDICTIONS:
1. Nicotine
2.Alcohol
3.Benzodiam
4.Oxycotin
5.Sugar
6.SEX

DO you stay away from all these? would you use your 12 guage rather than try any of these???


194 posted on 06/06/2005 8:46:20 AM PDT by missyme (Tell it like it is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
So are we going to fill the prisons with cancer patients?

Think of the cost of that!

195 posted on 06/06/2005 8:46:20 AM PDT by SittinYonder (Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LAURENTIJ

Have you ever left your house?


196 posted on 06/06/2005 8:46:33 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (McCain or Hillary, two Manchurians in a pod.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

People are dying from use of pharma approved pain relief.


197 posted on 06/06/2005 8:46:45 AM PDT by jayef (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: LAURENTIJ
I wouldn't use pot even if I had x disease. I refuse to become addicted to it.

Where'd you get the idea that pot is addictive?

198 posted on 06/06/2005 8:46:56 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

HAHA..No Joke..
Bizarre Poster!


199 posted on 06/06/2005 8:47:57 AM PDT by missyme (Tell it like it is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs

It appears some old fossils in DC are spouting gibberish again - gibberish increasingly ignored by the American people.


200 posted on 06/06/2005 8:49:04 AM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 1,261-1,272 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson